When it comes to Pedro II, I believe he was a great ruler. He was a man ahead of his time and his reign was full of controversy. However, his people viewed him as a dictator and a failure as a ruler. They appreciated his rule and eventually forced him into exile, replacing his government with a republic. He grabbed his political power in order to better education for all Brazilians. He viewed teachers as water and the students as the plants. He loved education and was addicted to making it better to raise the next leaders of Brazil. He visited classrooms and oversaw the education that the children were receiving. He even said that if he wasn’t a ruler, he would’ve been a teacher. He did wonders for the education system in Brazil. He was also selfless as well as beneficial. He refused to fix any repairs needed for his palace …show more content…
He should have, at the very least, raised the wages of the military since he knew he upset the Planters and the Religious faction in the nation. However, if he wanted to keep power he should have kept the bar of the Masons and freed the slaves. So when the Planters rebelled, he could have crushed them and then upset the religious faction later or pit them against each other by convincing the religious faction to his side by giving them big “donations.” While I believe that Pedro II was an excellent ruler, the circumstances at the time did not appreciate the man ahead of his time so he had strategized every political move he makes. He did things to quickly and lacked the patience to stabilize the nation before making his next move. I believe he had good intentions and wanted to make Brazil a more educated nation but the time just wasn’t right when he ruled. He was an intelligent man and focused on generating equality and bettering the education system. However, his ideologies came to an end when the public exiled him from
He was a good man. He knew that our life conditions had to of been improved witch is maybe why he chose a career in politics… “ A task to reform”. And his main goal was national unity, to come together as one. He made many important decisions regards to conscription and war and crisis’. If he hadn’t of made those decisions there’s no idea of knowing where we’d be today and In my opinion he made the right decisions he was a very smart and kind hearted man which makes him a great
He had a Ph.D in cultural anthropology and was able to help the Haitians using his knowledge. He helped more than just giving free medical care and money to them. He talked to them. He became one of them. He earned their trust and respect.
One of the greatest conquistadors in history was Alexander III of Macedon, also known as Alexander the Great. Behind his accomplishments of taking down the dominant Persia and the mighty Egypt, stands a leader who is confident, driven, a risk taker, a great communicator, and is both tactically and technically proficient. Alexander the Great is a prime example of the army’s definition of an adaptive leader. The young conqueror began his path to becoming a leader when he took over his father’s kingdom at the age of sixteen.
His leadership style, experiences in combat and tactics on and off the battle field made him a deadly enemy to anyone that was fighting against him. He had participated in the pursuit of Pancho Villa, he led troops in World War I and World War II. He was an amazing tactician and had a different leadership style from other Generals.
He was successful in several of the things that he did for the war of independence in Venezuela. He achieved tremendous growth in Latin America for the different nations that were under Spanish control. He also made major steps towards independence in Latin America and more specifically in Venezuela. Bolivar kick started a movement that may still be occurring today if he had not sparked the attention of the Creoles and Mestizos. Bolivar was also very hard on himself when looking back on all that he did in his life.
Overall, Vladimir III was a benevolent Absolute Monarch. He strengthened his country and the people in it using his power and authority and the backing of the
1. Andrew Jackson was the third of three sons born, and one more that died before Andrew. Andrew Jackson was named after his late father. Jackson was raised along with other members of their family. Although raised with another family, he knew he did not belong as the others did.
The American Civil War in 1865 was a turning point for our nation today. This transformation of the war between the Union and the Confederacy changed many lives, for the good and for the bad. Among the many changes that were heavily made consisted of abolishing slavery, restoration with the war, and the Thirteenth Amendment being brought forth. Formal president Abraham Lincoln main goal during the civil war was to save the union, while maintaining a great compromise with the union and the confederacy. With so many challenges being faced, the battle between the union and the confederacy was a war that changed for the better under Lincoln's strategy plan.
He was a courageous man who knew how to stir up a crowd and get them excited to do things. One famous example is when he started the slogan “si Se Puede” which translates too It can be done. This was a slogan that would be tied
Introduction Brazil's independence takes place in a relatively short period of time. Which can be officially placed between February 18, 1822 and March 8, 1824, which, compared to other wars of independence in different parts of the world, we can say that it is smaller, and also comparing the way it is carried out After this independence, we can say that, although the conflict was not totally peaceful, it was a less bloody war, in comparison with the majority of the wars of the other Spanish-American countries. The most important issues about Brazilian independence, which takes place as a result of the Napoleonic wars, will be discussed. To begin to give a context to this event, I will begin by saying that the most important trigger for
When you develop the culture, he gives the citizens more pride. And the politics, he wanted everyone to have a say in the leadership of their country. He wanted everyone to able to participate in elections, and he wanted the heads of state that sat in the
Thinkers Beliefs How their ideas were radical at that time How their ideas are related to classical liberalism Hobbes His belief was that the reason why humans have so many problems is because of their greed to protect only themselves. And monarchy was always more interested in helping those who benefitted them in return. He believed that a fair executor who would use his authority to stop humans from harming others is needed. His ideas were viewed radical at that time because state had less power and monarchy had all of it, it was times of war where weak people would get killed if they did not listen to wealthier class. His ideas in my opinion are like the base of foundation of classical liberalism as him and his peers were the some of the first people to research the “state of nature”” of people which made many of his successors want to do more for the cause.
He never questioned nor doubted but only worked. He was a model for all of us. He was resolute to work and sacrifice to the society. He motivated every single one of
After exploring the hidden truths behind the culture, I have discovered this: The cultural identity of the Brazilian community is far more diverse and dynamic than what is portrayed in society and the media. One of the most important contributing aspects to a community’s culture is its history. Brazil was discovered by Pedro Álvares Cabral on April 22,1500. From that point on, the Portuguese ruled over this land, focusing greatly on its vast sugar-cane plantations.
His political authority grew stronger as the years went on therefore, he “attained supreme power by universal consent.” He did this by gaining the peoples respect. The people loved him so much that gave him the title of “father of the country.” Which showed how much they truly adored