People vs. Tuner Case Analysis Background Brock Allen Turner was a nineteen-year-old star athlete, a freshmen swimmer at Stanford University who was admitted in the fall of 2014 on a swimming scholarship. On January 17, 2015, he attended a party at Kappa Alpha fraternity house where he met the victim, twenty-year-old women who later identified as Emily Doe, her sister and their friends. Turner and the victim both consumed alcohol at the party. Shortly after the midnight of January 18, 2015, Tuner and the victim left the party and the victim was split up from her friends. The victim made a couple unintelligible phone calls from 11:54p.m to 12:28 a.m with her friends, then later on passed out behind a nearby dumpster outside the fraternity …show more content…
He pleaded not guilty on all five charges on February 2, 2015. The prosecutors drop the two rape charges on October 7, 2015 after reviewing the DNA test result. Turner was convicted the three charges of felony sexual assault on March 30, 2016 by Santa Clara County jury. On June 2, 2016, Turner was sentenced to six months of prison in the Santa Clara County jail, followed by three years of probation, and a life-long obligation to be lawfully registered as a sex offender by judge …show more content…
More than 1 million people had signed the petition on change.org, and more than 100,000 on the White House’s We the People site to remove Judge Aaron Persky from the bench. Judge Persky was criticized for failing to sympathize with the innocent women who was sexually assaulted, but recognize the attacker as the real victim of the case. He was criticized for being too lenient on the defendant for him being a privileged white male athlete from a prestigious school, and the result would be different if he was from a different social class and being a different race. Michele Dauber, a Stanford law professor and a friend of the victim’s family in the Turner case, organized a fierce recall effort to recall Judge Persky. Recall supporters plan to start collecting the 58,634 signatures they need to get the recall on the June 2018 primary election ballot to remove Judge
In Baltimore City an Attorney is accused of offering a rape victim three thousand dollars not to justify, and tells her she can be deported. Christos Vasilides tries to stop the rape victim from justifying against his client Christos Vasilides and his helper cited the Trump administration's stance on undocumented immigrants in an attempt to discourage her from showing up to court, according to an indictment by the Maryland Attorney General's office. On April 11th, Christos and his interpreter Edgar Rodriguez asked to meet with the victims husband saying that case has become more "complicated" because Immigration and Customs Enforcement would be there and new federal laws could lead them to being deported. Christos said his client who was
Breanne Barbato Journalism Final Petition for Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey to be released. Imagine being targeted by those who are expected to protect you and your rights, what would you do? After the release of the Netflix Original documentary series, Making a Murderer, there is a petition being held that is currently at 445,000 out of 500,000 signatures to possibly free the convicted ‘murderers’. The petition will be sent to and reviewed by for the White House and Supreme Court.
In Steubenville, Ohio, a sixteen-year-old girl was attending a local high school party with her friends. The girl was more intoxicated than others and refused to go home after the party was shut down. She then joined a group of guys who were going to another party and when they get there, the girl was too drunk to remember anything else. Two of the boys that were with her were Trent Mays and Malik Richmond. Both of them were football players at Steubenville High School, which was a big deal in small town Steubenville.
As part of its strategy to enjoin the NAACP from operating, Alabama required it to reveal to the State's Attorney General the names and addresses of all the NAACP's members and agents in the state. The NAACP argued that this violated the due process clause of the 14th amendment. Verdict: Unanamous decision for the NAACP, majority opinion by John M. Harlan II. He said that “that a compelled disclosure of the NAACP's membership lists would have the effect of suppressing legal association among the group's members”.
The court cases Goldberg and Wheeler do not stand for the proposition that only welfare benefits for people in extreme circumstances are entitled to pre-termination hearings. However, this is one situation where cutting off benefits with little or no notice could affect the well-being of the family or person. Any programs that offer they type of assistance people rely on to survive could benefit from pre-termination hearings, not just the welfare program. Welfare is one of the main public assistance programs, although I think housing assistance and food stamps might fall into the welfare category, they are also in need of a pre-termination hearing. In the Goldberg and Wheeler cases, California and New York did not want to give anyone a hearing
In the January 29, The Stanford Daily editorial Stanford, California, it debates the different essential of the principle of morality and identified Brock Turner had applied a use of force in raping an unconscious woman behind the dumpster. Furthermore, the young man attended Stanford University and participated in his college swim team dreamt of partaking in the Olympus. The victim heartfelt statement during the trial is disregarded because he comes from a class of privilege and is a man. Not to mention, Brock Turner’s father wrote a letter to expressing the universalizability to court saying, “my son’s life shouldn’t be ruined over 20 minutes of action (Dreher,Rod).” Therefore, Aaron Persky who is a California judge implemented an ethical decision that contemplated the clarity around both the specific choice and decision then declared a six months sentenced ruling.
In the case of People v. Hollins, which involved a 32 year old man having consensual sex with a 17 year old girl was not necessarily violating the statutory rape law; he was charged with child pornography due to the fact that he had filmed the encounter and under Illinois statute, which defines child pornography as exploitation of a minor under 18. In my mindset, I do not believe that he would have the right to any due process or equal protection arguments. My opinion stems from this because due process in short, is defined as arrests and trials meeting minimum standards of fairness and upholding laws to ensure they do not violate constitutional rights. The man being charged however was never violated of his constitutional rights because
Dear "Papery Newspaper," After I read your recent article, "Haywood Patterson Trial Strikes Again!" by Sophia Rowe, I felt the need to clarify what the article did not say. The public is ignorant to the significant problems that are being brought into our court every day and innocent lives are paying the price. This article specifically makes me angry and passionate for change. Many of you know about Judge Horton. He is a very fair and unbiased person, who has spoken many words of wisdom.
Yet a sober analysis of the matter reveals that the victim is important and the fact that Brock Turner sexually assaulted her should not be disregarded just because he was a great student and athlete. Dan Turner blames the partying culture of college for his son’s behavior but in reality, there is no excuse for sexual
CNN quotes Judge Persky, “A prison sentence would have a severe impact on him. I think he will not be a danger to others.” Judge Persky is biased because he used to be a Stanford athlete, like Turner. When Persky attended Stanford, he was a lacrosse team captain for the school team (Brennan). What concerns the judge about delivering a long sentence to Turner is that it would ruin his future in swimming.
He has requested to be moved from criminal to civil court, subsequent to the scrutiny and attention he received from the Turner ruling. An organization called “Recall Judge Persky” are requesting 80,000 signatures so
State of Georgia V. Marcus Dwayne Dixon (2003) Marcus Dixon was a highly recruited high school football player. His life suddenly took a tragic turn when he was falsely convicted of raping a 15 year old girl. The elements around his false conviction could have been avoided with some reform to the criminal justice courts system. Dixon initially had many charges against him but were narrowed down to statutory rape and aggravated child molestation. There was much racial disparity surrounding the jury on Dixon’s case, in that the county that Dixon committed his “crime” was a predominantly white population.
He spent 15 years of his life because of the eye-witness misidentification of Shemita Greer. “Sedrick Courtney is a 23 year old man wrongfully convicted and spent 15 years in jail” (Innocence Project). This shows how many years he has spent in jail innocent because of the government and one person’s mistake. The crime went down, and who the victim in it which is Shemita
a) Provide a brief explanation of the proper business process involved in this case. For example: What should have been the proper document flow, personnel involved, authorization(s) required, etc.? a. In this case, a few issues with supervision caused the opportunity for this particular type of crime to be committed. The Supervisor’s trust given to Turner was a fatal flaw in the internal controls set in place to prevent this from happening.
Their first victim, sixteen-year-old Lucinda Schaeffer, was walking towards her grandmother’s house after attending a youth meeting with the St. Andrews Presbyterian Church in Redondo Beach, California, June 24, 1979. According to Pulham, Bittaker and Norris started the day off by going to Redondo Beach at 11 am, drinking beer, flirting with woman, and searching for a suitable victim. Pulham stated that at five o’clock in the afternoon, Bittaker saw their first potential victim walking alongside the Pacific Coast Highway and tells Norris, “there’s a cute little blonde,” which was, of course, Schaeffer. Bittaker, being the driver, drove up to Schaeffer while Norris tried to initiate a conversation by asking her if she wanted a ride to her destination. Schaeffer refused the offer, was asked again, and refused the second offer as well.