The use of performance-enhancing drugs (PED's) and blood doping has been a controversial issue in the world of sports for decades. The question of whether or not to continue testing and banning athletes who use these substances has been a topic of debate among athletes, coaches, and sports organizations. In the movie Icarus, director Bryan Fogel explores the world of doping in sports and the impact that it has on the athletes who participate in it. Through the film, we see firsthand the consequences of PED use and the danger it poses to not only the athletes but also to the integrity of sports as a whole. One of the main arguments for continuing to test and ban athletes who use PED's is that it ensures fairness and integrity in sports. As former Tour de France winner Greg LeMond states in the movie, "If we don't have rules, …show more content…
Furthermore, testing and banning athletes who use PED's sends a message that cheating and breaking the rules are not tolerated in sports. This helps to maintain the integrity of the sport and the trust that fans have in the athletes they are watching. Another argument for continuing to test and ban athletes who use PED's is the danger that these substances pose to the health and well-being of the athletes who use them. As Dr. Don Catlin, a leading expert in the field of doping in sports, states in the movie, "This is not a game. This is not a hobby. This is playing with your health, and you're playing with your life." PED's and blood doping can have serious and even deadly side effects, and many athletes who use these substances do so without fully understanding the risks they are taking. By testing and banning athletes who use these substances, sports organizations are taking steps to protect the health and well-being of their
Steroid usage in sports has been a controversial issue since it began sometime around the 1940’s. The conflicting opinions of how steroids in sports should be managed has eventually created what can be accurately described as a whirlwind of confusion. In the two articles “Destroyed” by Peter F. Martin, and “The Designer Player” by Rodrigo Villagomez, the authors differ in their opinions about steroid usage in sports. While Martin believes that steroid users are ruining the game and their bodies, Villagomez thinks that living itself is harming our bodies and that steroid users are heroes for making the game more interesting. However, both authors are attempting to persuade their audiences into believing what they think.
Throughout the article written by Leigh Cowart she describes how Performance enhancing drugs are not only bad for the sports themselves, but also very harmful to the players that use them. The author uses many arguments including how athletes already push their body to the limits, so intaking an outside substance will tear the body down rather than build it up. Cowart also denies the thought that Steroids make sports an even playing field by stating that they will only help the strong and make the weak weaker. In the article Leigh Cowart uses strong tone to help her get the point across that drugs do not benefit the athletes in any way.
Drugs are a big issue in the sports industry. Many athletes will take performance-enhancing drugs, such as steroids, to help them play better. These types of drugs should not be allowed because it gives the player a greater advantage over other players who are playing with their natural ability. This issue could be solved if there was monthly drug testing and if the drug was not so easy to get ahold of. Many major league baseball players are getting caught using performance-enhancing drugs.
Dr. LIncoln Allison argues that in truth, steroids are not really “cheating”, they are just a way to bring out the full ability from a player. “A sportsman or woman who seeks an advantage from drugs just moves up to the level appropriate to his or her underlying ability”(107). She suggests that we deal with other, much greater problems, before worrying about teroid issue, ”In general, the risk to health from performance-enhancing drugs is considerably less than that from tobacco or alcohol, and we ought not to apply paternalistic moral assumptions to sport that we are not prepared to apply to the rest of
When an athlete performs extremely well at the Olympics many fans then start to become suspicious on whether or not that athlete is on some type of drug. In the following readings, “A Shot in the Rear: Why Are We Really against Steroids?” by L. Caplan, “The Science of Doping”, by Christie Ashwanden, “Genetically Modified Athletes” by John Naish, and “When Winning Costs Too Much” by John McCloskey,
Today, some athletes exceed others easily, and it’s not a secret how. It’s actually easy to play to the best of your ability with just a small change, doping. Since the 1980’s athletes have been taking performance enhancing drugs to increase their chance of beating opponents. Even though PED’s might harm the body, they should be allowed in pro sports because they improve the amount of spectators and they help athletes get back on to competing as quickly.
The article tries explain how an athlete can get PEDs for therapeutic use, it also explains the limitations of this process. It also tries to explain that the reasons that may sway athletes to take illegal PEDs are very complex, these factors range from peer pressure to misleading information on PEDs to many other factors. In addition, the article also examines the dangers of the use of PEDs from a health stand point and a professional stand point. This article I believe provides valuable information for my research as I am trying to formulate the many reasons why an athlete would use performance enhancing
Background: Performance-enhancing drugs have been widely used in sports for centuries. The first recorded use of PEDS in sports was during the ancient Olympic games in 776 BC when athletes experimented with herbal medication 2. However, what qualifies as cheating to us was perfectly acceptable to them and the athletes that participated weren’t
In conclusion, Performance Enhancing Drugs should not be tolerated in any sport, whether professional or amatuer. These drugs are highly dangerous and even lethal to all athletes who use them. It is also unfair to athletes who choose not to use these drugs, as they are performing on their hard work and talent and not relying on an “edge” to help them reach their goals. These drugs are highly addictive, just like any other street drug or alcohol and can be fatal in many cases.
An athlete has a drive to be the best in sports, but using steroids is not the best way to be the best. Sports are supposed to be fun and a way of proving an athlete’s talent; however, by using steroids, they are damaging their own well-being and the image of sports. An athlete is affecting themselves just as much as the sports itself. Being great at sports should be with hard work and dedication, not by using steroids. An athlete is not playing for the love of the sport, but to simply get money, they are playing for themselves.
One of these is the negative effects of the drugs on the person taking the PEDs. Taking PEDs can take a major toll on your health, so that is why PEDs should not be allowed in sports. Steroids and creatine are two major supplements that are used by athletes. It has been documented that use of these causes major health risks like kidney and liver damage. PEDs have shown no long-term rewards just some short-term like strength and speed.
Picture this every athlete in sports using drugs no one depends on skill anymore everyone depends on performance enhancing drugs like adrenaline and steroids. Many athletes today use drugs to enhance their skills in all sports. This is a problem because some athletes use their own skills and are getting beaten by athletes who use drugs. Performance enhancement drugs create an unfair advantage over those athletes who choose to rely on their own skill. Banning drugs in sports can make a difference in the athlete 's health Drugs like steroids could decrease the user 's lifespan Performance enhancers, like steroids and other forms of doping have a negative effect on long term health ¨Gary Becker, PhD Professor in the Departments
Athletes use of performance enhancing drugs has become all too common in today’s society. With many athletes testing positive for doping, sports are becoming tarnished with athletes trying to gain an unfair advantage on their competitors. Although players are tested often for such drugs, there are still many loopholes and some drugs are not detected by current systems. So what would cause an athlete to put their body at risk to gain just a slight edge on their competitor? Sports should be a test of real skill, not artificial skills given by doctors.
AS91101 - 2.4 Writing Portfolio Piece Two - Cooper Title: Drugs in sports Drugs have become an integral part of any modern day sporting event. Drugs give an unfair advantage to the user and the competitors that are using enhancements are not using their own full abilities to win the Olympic medal or championship. This makes it unfair to other competitors that are not using a drug or other enhancements to compete. Athletes like Lance Armstrong and Nadzeya Ostapchuk not only give sportsmen and women a bad reputation but influence the way the public think about sports and run the risk of addiction and long-term health issues.
Even though using performance enhancement drugs can give athletes benefits, but it can also cause harm and severe danger as well, therefore using drugs in sports should still be illegal. Competitors would prepare harder and try to meet their goals while some will attempt to cheat their way by utilizing enhanced medications to expand their capacities even beyond. The want to win is very affected in the idea of games, and a few competitors will do whatever it takes to ascend to the top. Over the most recent few years, numerous competitors in various games have been caught using performance enhancement drugs. At the point when a competitor tests positive to participate in sports, the competitor is either disqualified or suspended for the entire game.