Regardless of their temporary positive impacts on athletes’ performances, the long-term effects of performance-enhancing drugs are serving the downfall of athleticism across the globe by Performance-enhancing drugs are substances used to improve performance. They act as stimulants that provide an increase in attentiveness, a temporary burst of energy, and a decrease in reaction time. In their early appearances, performance-enhancing drugs were seen as the perfect method to improve one’s athletic performances in all kinds of sports instantaneously. As the implications of these substances came into sight at different elite sports events across the globe, negative outcomes emerged. Optimists argued with reference to improved athletic abilities, …show more content…
Some people see taking performance-enhancing drugs as harmless and beneficial as coaching and training. They also believe that these drugs have the same importance as utilities used in sports like extreme rock climbing for example. One can climb cliffs, but one can climb them easier with the help of ropes, crampons, and oxygen. Some athletes spend much more time in the weight room than others and thereby build their muscular strength to levels significantly higher than their opponents’, those opponents who want to remain competitive may feel compelled to also put in more time with weights. But there is nothing wrong about the situation that should lead those interested in maintaining sportsmanship to forbid or regulate weight training. These utilities enhance people’s performance in rock climbing and make it easier for them to participate in that sports event, otherwise it would be really hard without them. Athletes, with the help of medical staff and dietitians always work on improvement. Medical staffs monitor body activities like blood pressure, body temperature, heart muscle and brain activity and many other details. Dieticians are experts in diets and nutrition that hand out specific diets to improve health, maintain body weight, and optimize …show more content…
According to Thomsen and Anderson (2015), Armstrong was once considered one of the greatest athletes in history having won the “Tour De France”, a cycling competition held in France, for seven consecutive times from 1999 through 2005. Another factor that lead to his fame is that he achieved this feat having just recovered from testicular cancer. He was always accused of taking performance-enhancing drugs, more specifically “doping”, throughout all of his races. Armstrong denied the accusations year after year, then came a point where all the evidence was stacked up against him. His former cycling partners from races stood up, admitted to doping and accepted their wrongdoings and fate. After nearly 14 years of denying that he had cheated, Armstrong publicly announced his confession upon agreeing to participate in a televised interview hosted by Oprah Winfrey. He shared all of his secrets and crimes, and was immediately stripped down of all seven of his “Tour De France” titles. He had also been issued a lifetime ban from all professional sports that adopt the World Anti-Doping Agency
Steroid usage in sports has been a controversial issue since it began sometime around the 1940’s. The conflicting opinions of how steroids in sports should be managed has eventually created what can be accurately described as a whirlwind of confusion. In the two articles “Destroyed” by Peter F. Martin, and “The Designer Player” by Rodrigo Villagomez, the authors differ in their opinions about steroid usage in sports. While Martin believes that steroid users are ruining the game and their bodies, Villagomez thinks that living itself is harming our bodies and that steroid users are heroes for making the game more interesting. However, both authors are attempting to persuade their audiences into believing what they think.
Throughout the article written by Leigh Cowart she describes how Performance enhancing drugs are not only bad for the sports themselves, but also very harmful to the players that use them. The author uses many arguments including how athletes already push their body to the limits, so intaking an outside substance will tear the body down rather than build it up. Cowart also denies the thought that Steroids make sports an even playing field by stating that they will only help the strong and make the weak weaker. In the article Leigh Cowart uses strong tone to help her get the point across that drugs do not benefit the athletes in any way.
This was just the beginning for Lance Armstrong. After his first win, he continue to race in the next in the six seven Tour De Frances. Not only did Lance compete in the next six Tour De Frances, he won each and every one of them. After winning seven consecutive Tour De France titles, he decided to retire from cycling in the summer 2005. After retirement Lance popularity continued to rise, that was until a drug test was done in late 2005 on the urine of the 1999 Tour De France athletes.
The history of drugs in sport is one of the main impacting factors on its impact within society because it is through the history that many other aspects such as the economy have been impacted. The use of drugs in sport by athletes such as Lance Armstrong throughout the history of high performance sport has meant that with every new method of testing that the world anti-doping agency is coming out with, there are people coming out with ways for their athletes to undetectably dope. This has meant that because athletes have seen other athletes such as Lance Armstrong get away with doping for so many years, they believe that they too can easily get away with in, therefore creating an increase in the use of drug in sport. Between 2012 and 2013 there was a 20% increase in the positive testing to drugs by both Olympic and non-Olympic sport. This is a dramatic increase because of the fact that there was only an increase of 0.8% in the amount of drug testing preformed (14).
When an athlete performs extremely well at the Olympics many fans then start to become suspicious on whether or not that athlete is on some type of drug. In the following readings, “A Shot in the Rear: Why Are We Really against Steroids?” by L. Caplan, “The Science of Doping”, by Christie Ashwanden, “Genetically Modified Athletes” by John Naish, and “When Winning Costs Too Much” by John McCloskey,
Since the middle of the twentieth century performance enhancements drugs have been popular in sports such as baseball. This was not the begging of the use of these drugs, this drug use dates back to the Greeks, who would use it in their sports (Mottram 1). Many people are unaware of this us because the Greeks kept this hidden from everyone except those involved in the sport (Mottram 1). These drugs were also beginning to get banned in sports starting with the Olympics (Mottram 2), once the effect that these drugs have were analyzed to do more harm than good. By analyzing the effect that performance enhancement drugs have on the athlete, the sport (Major League Baseball), and younger athletes, more than enough evidence will be given to counter prove Chafets arguments on legalizing the use of performance enhancement drugs in Major League
The epic downfall of cyclings star, Lance Armstrong, once an idolized icon of millions around the globe, stands out in the history of professional sports. After denying the allegations for years, the cyclist admitted to using performance- enhancing drugs. As a result, he was stripped of his 7 Tour de France titles and an olympic bronze medal. "Lance Armstrong has no place in cycling," said the union president of cycling, Pat McQuaid, announcing that Armstrong is also banned from the sport. Before the incident, Armstrong overcame life threatening cancer, so when he kept winning the Tour de France and making millions of dollars, everyone thought that he could overcome anything.
9.2 (2013): 135-59. Print. This article written by Jack Anderson a Professor of Law at Queen’s University, Belfast, concerns the legal issues that surround the prohibition of doping in sport. The current policy on the use of performance enhancing drugs in sport is underpinned by both a paternalistic desire to protect athletes' health and the long-term integrity
Introduction: One of the largest industries in the United States is the professional sports industry; it brought in $63 billion in 2015 1. Professional athletes are seen as strong and talented, but how much of their strength and talent is achieved naturally? Performance-enhancing drugs have been increasingly used in professional sports and are prohibited from being used, but should they be prohibited?
In conclusion, Performance Enhancing Drugs should not be tolerated in any sport, whether professional or amatuer. These drugs are highly dangerous and even lethal to all athletes who use them. It is also unfair to athletes who choose not to use these drugs, as they are performing on their hard work and talent and not relying on an “edge” to help them reach their goals. These drugs are highly addictive, just like any other street drug or alcohol and can be fatal in many cases.
Performance enhancing drug use is increasing muscle strength, body size, and the healing rate. It allows fans to see the maximum potential of the athletes. However (transitions) it is not fair to the athletes that don 't use steroids. Steroids are not any different than other drugs: they are addicting. (compound)
She found that Olympic athletes, in general, believed that most successful athletes were using banned substances.¨ There will be no reason to play the sport anymore if people cheat.thomas ¨H. Murray, PhD, President of the Hastings Center, in the chapter¨ "Sports Enhancement" ¨published in the 2008-2009 From Birth to Death and Bench to Clinic: The Hastings Center
Athletes use of performance enhancing drugs has become all too common in today’s society. With many athletes testing positive for doping, sports are becoming tarnished with athletes trying to gain an unfair advantage on their competitors. Although players are tested often for such drugs, there are still many loopholes and some drugs are not detected by current systems. So what would cause an athlete to put their body at risk to gain just a slight edge on their competitor? Sports should be a test of real skill, not artificial skills given by doctors.
The use of performance enhancing drugs has been one of the most controversial issues in today’s contemporary sports. The use of performance enhancing drugs is oftentimes referred to as doping. Doping has been around for centuries. Many people feel as if doping is a moral issue rather than a medical/biological one, however this is just not the case. Doping is a medical issue, and the present and current system is flawed and fails to catch many athletes who are users of performance enhancing drugs.
AS91101 - 2.4 Writing Portfolio Piece Two - Cooper Title: Drugs in sports Drugs have become an integral part of any modern day sporting event. Drugs give an unfair advantage to the user and the competitors that are using enhancements are not using their own full abilities to win the Olympic medal or championship. This makes it unfair to other competitors that are not using a drug or other enhancements to compete. Athletes like Lance Armstrong and Nadzeya Ostapchuk not only give sportsmen and women a bad reputation but influence the way the public think about sports and run the risk of addiction and long-term health issues.