Perry Patetic's Analysis

One of the most significant advances in technology in recent times has been the invention of the cell phone. Cell phones have become a massive part of the world that people live in today. The ability to communicate with anybody in any part of the world whenever possible has been a substantial improvement to the way individuals live. Technology has allowed people to connect in more ways than ever before, but it is currently disconnecting people from the world right in front of them. Paul Goldberger’s essay “Disconnected Urbanism” incorporates multiple persuasive methods to be successful in effectively convincing its audience that cell phones have taken people away from the places around them.

When people are talking on a cellular phone and walking around, they tend to lose the sense of what is going on around them, which leaves them blind to any potential threat because of carelessness, and they miss the offer that is given at that moment in time. In this article, “Disconnected Urbanism” by Paul Goldberger from the textbook on page 235, Goldberger discusses about people’s usage of cellular phones — today’s one of the most effective technology in the world that have changed people’s lives — talks about how the cellular phones are impacting people who living in a densely populated urban area, how people are now becoming disconnected from the world around them, and what are causing to their ability to perceive space. He talks about the seriousness of technology in the world to the readers with persuasive and pessimistic phrases from a subjective point of view. In his overall narration, he compares and contrasts between two different main objects to persuade the readers.

In the essay, “Isolated by the Internet”, author Clifford Stoll explains that recent research, conducted by psychologists Robert Kraut and Vicki Lundmark, suggests that frequent use of the Internet has had a generally negative effect on the psychological well being of its users. Using examples from Kraut and Lundmark’s previously mentioned research, Stoll asks, “Will the proliferation of shallow, distant social ties make up for the loss of close local links?” The question Stoll raises here is entirely valid, and just as concerning; as the more time one spends online, the more time one subsequently spends alone, away from people he or she could be potentially interacting with. I believe Stoll’s concerns are completely justified as today, (falsely comforted by shallow, superficial relationships,

When people move away from each other, the space can make their relationship better. Perry Patetic in his passage argues that the advantages to living in such a high mobile society are nothing to the many disadvantages. The author supports his claim by first showing ways that people's relationships are separated by distance. He continues by saying that we lack close relationships that our previous generations had. The authors purpose is to show people how easy it is to move away with today's technology so that people can see how their relationships are being affected. The author creates a formal tone for people with long distance relationships. Although people can be separated by distance, their relationships can improve with space between them.

Perry smith is a main character and murderer who struggles against his own personality characteristics. He fails to achieve this goal because of certain characteristics. But what really mad perry tick? Who really knows; could it be because the way he was raised, was it only for attention or was he looking for someone to show him differently; what's right and what’s wrong. In the book “ In Cold Blood” By Truman Capote's he shows a different side of Perry.

We live in age of social media, we have built expansive social networks online, yet the depths of our networks offline have decreased. It seems that technology has made it easier to stay in contact while keeping distance, more and more people find themselves feeling isolated and never experiencing real contact with others. It has made us more isolated and feeling alone.

Most families don't live respectively, similar to grandparents don't normally live with their youngsters and grandchildren. When they move away, they meet new individuals, make new companions, investigate their surroundings, thus considerably more! Also mobility makes it easier to visit those who have moved away, or those that people have moved away from. In conflict with Perry Patetic, a many people move from their home wind up, along the way, find and make new connections that could endure

A miracle. That is how Eula Bliss felt about the invention of the telephone. Perhaps because it is a miracle. Worldwide communication. Suddenly everyone is only a one phone call away and we are all connected. The invention of the telephone was a gold shining idea, an idea that only had one purpose: to connect people – the invention did connect people, but it also did so much more than that. Something that will be overshadowing the invention forever.

The way our society is now people lose their close relationships with people they love due to mass transportation and a quick moving society. Perry Patetic in this excerpt, argues that “We often lose track of old friends”. That is caused by “living in such a highly mobile society”. The author supports his argument by first confessing that having such a high society it is easy to leave a family or loved one. He continues by claiming a new transportation is bad and loses relationships. The authors purpose is to tell the reader to try and stay near their home to maintain the relationships because it is hard for people to try to talk on the phone instead of face to face time. The author uses a disappointed and serious tone so for the reader to understand leaving is bad. The author descriptively states why he does not like the fast moving society and it is a bad thing to lose close relationships with the people they would leave.

She feels lonely and isolated from the family whom she had hoped to bond with. But suddenly her daughter got tangled in her seat belt. As it turns out that she had a pair of scissors in an old fashioned emergency kit. “ The scissors may have been low on tech, but at least they were the right tool,” (Segelman, 2007, P.2). Then as he road trip was about to end, she had hoped that we don't tune out on some basic things. She worries that our devices will disconnect us from people, sites, and experiences around us. Reflecting on the impact of technology, Segelman describes the different types of road trips that she experiences when she states, “ When I was young, driving cross country was a shared experience. Today, we're all driving solo,” (Segelman, 2007, P.2). Basically, Segelman argues that the old road trips with her family have a sense of bonding whereas the new one has a sense of isolation because of technology that is in the way of family

The easiest method is simply to have dinner together. That sounds very odd, but one method of staying connected is to go on “dates”. Often these so called dates are computer mediated, meaning a skype call. In her book, Stafford discusses how computer-mediated communication(CMC) affects relationships. Mainly, the hyperpersonal communication, an overly positive and very personal type of communication generally seen online. This alongside the fact that emails and IMs promote an overall positive interpretation of the relationship makes using technology to stay connected through dates like the best method (Stafford,90,95). Something that my partner and I have implemented, is regular phone calls and texting. We also try to watch similar shows, even watch them together. These are common ways used by a myriad of people across the internet to stay connected. Normally, close proximity relationships are based around shared interests, and LDRs should be two. Both parties should have some agreed upon interests because as life goes on the twe people will change. Those commonalities will help keep the relationship together as they grow and change. On her blog, Lisa discusses this aspect of the relationship, “If you are in an ‘In Real Life’ relationship, you can grow and change together because of the habits you mutually form while living as a couple. When in a LDR, there is a chance you will meet your sweetheart after 6 months and be asking yourself “where is the person I fell in love with?” This is why those shared interests need to be fostered. In a sense, both parties must synthesize that organic growth together proximity relationships

For instance, it is unnecessary to have an extent list of contacts that you have added into your account of social media, such as Facebook, because there is no one to change feelings with. Based on the essay, it clearly says, “The image of the one true friend, a soul mate rare to find but dearly beloved, has completely disappeared from our culture” (Deresiewicz, 438). In other words, technology involves social media where people tend to lose physical connection to other. He blames social networking and social media for friendships these days not being what they used to be. Nowadays, people interact each other over the phone.

Family time, making time for relationships is everything but lately there has been less and less. Perry Patetic in his opinion essay or claims that mobile society is more of a disadvantage when it comes to relationships. The author supports his position by first stating that our generation is not as close as other generations. He continues by saying that just for grandparents to see their grandchildren that they have to travel long distance. The author’s purpose is to argue that the world of today is limiting our connections with others so that everyone knows that there is a problem in today 's society. The author establishes a judgmental tone for everyone. Having a modern mobilized world should not be the reason for weak relationships.

Since the beginning of time, families have had a member or friend that has lived cities maybe even states away, but mobility should not be the reason for them to lose that relationship.Perry Patetic in his article, “Fast-Moving Society” argues that mobility is the reason why families and friends lose good relationships. The author supports his argument by first demonstrating how mobility makes is easier to move away from people and places in the past. He continues by saying traveling long distance is the only way grandparents and grandchildren can spend time together nowadays. The author’s purpose is to convince everyone that mobility is the big issues and it keeps progressing in order so that others will realize this and stop using it to move away. The author establishes a bitter tone for mobility. Mobility should not be an excuse for families and friends to lose touch, traveling can be such an adventure and mobility is a solution to long distance rather than a problem.

Before the invention of the computer and the internet, face to face communication was a normal everyday occurrence and loneliness and isolation was a problem that rarely was experienced or discussed. People moved about their day looking up speaking to each other as they passed by at the local store. Currently, technology is an essential part of many people’s lives, allowing them to use their devices and communicate with others in diverse ways and places.