The Personal Assessment of Personal Inventory (PAIR) was developed in 1981, by Schaefer & Olson to evaluate the authentic and ideal levels of intimacy in relationships extending in several different areas. (Kathleen, 1998) The theoretical basis or goal of the scale is to provide therapists’ with awareness about couples over a series of significant intimate areas and give insight to the couple about themselves as well as their partners wants, needs and desires. “The PAIR can be used for all types of dyadic relations including friendships, dating, premarital, cohabiting, and marriage relationships. (Centore, 2012) The Personal Assessment Inventory is being used as a couple assessment tool in premarital and marriage counseling, as well as a …show more content…
They emphasized that normative information is not appropriate for the PAIR instrument because it is the discrepancy between the ideal and actual levels for each dimension for husband and wife that are important and should serve as a basis for counseling work. Little guidance is provided, however, on how to evaluate the discrepancies between real and ideal levels for husband and wife other than a statement that a discrepancy of less than 5 points between the husband and wife 's perceptions is probably inconsequential. Otherwise, the counselor and clients are left to their own devices to interpret the results. The reliability of the perceptions on the various dimensions is not very high, ranging from .70 to .77 with a mean of .726. This is, however, about as high as one can expect from scales that consist of six items. The reliability of the Conventionality (lie) scale is .80. In their 1981 article, the authors report that no test-retest information was available.
According to, Constant (2016), studies have also reported gender differences in the meaning of intimacy. Numerous women define intimacy as love, affection, and expression of heartfelt feelings, while men express it as a sexual behavior and physical closeness. In addition, gender differences are
…show more content…
Marriage and Family Therapist, and AAMFT members have an obligation to be familiar with the AAMFT Code of Ethics and its application to their professional services. Lack of awareness or misunderstanding of an ethical standard is not a defense to a charge of unethical conduct. (Caldwell, 2015) While utilizing the PAIR instrument, it important for therapist to understand while intimacy is the topic of discussion, it is important not to get involved romantically with client or client’s family members in any way. Having sexual relationships with a client(s) will violate AAMFT’s code of Ethics 1.4 Sexual Intimacy with Current Clients and Others that states sexual intimacy with current clients or with known members of the client’s family system is prohibited and code 1.5 Sexual Intimacy with Former Clients and Others that states sexual intimacy with former clients or with known members of the client’s family system is prohibited. (Caldwell,
When choosing the precise setting it is important that the site is comfortable and convenient for both parties. It would be beneficial if the site was quiet and had internet connection. This would allow the clinician to have all the resources they needed during the session. Case 7 Al saw Dale and his wife for several sessions of couples counseling. The day after one of their session, Dale called Al in an agitated state and said he “would not live without his wife.”
Running Head: SCREENING AND ASSESSMENT 1 SCREENING AND ASSESSMENT 6 Screening and Assessment Unit 3 Name Institutional Affiliation Historical and Contextual Considerations In the case of Charles, historical considerations that are relevant are him losing the job and his past attitudes on having children. The historical considerations of Charles impact the plan assessment because it determines the nature and questions to be asked. In the case of Sabrina, the historical considerations to be considered are her infertility situations that triggered the divorce.
Sexual and/or romantic relationships prohibited because according to the ACA (2014), the therapist sexual and/or romantic interactions or relationship with current client, romantic partners, or family members are prohibited. For example, the romantic relationship between Paul and Laura will cause harm to the patient, because is at a very vulnerable frame of mind at that point in time because she was looking for someone who can listen to her and not taking advantage of her. Therefore, is an I.2.b.ethical violation: is to refer the matter to the state or national committees on professional ethics, voluntary national certification bodies, state licensing boards and other appropriate institutional authorities. Also, the situation should be revealed to his wife that he was engaged in a romantic relationship with a vulnerable client and if he is working for a company he should terminated immediately for
Marriage and couples counselors believe that life 's most crucial relationships can survive with the proper instruction and encouragement. They believe that a healthy relationship just needs some TLC. The specialists within the Overland Park network help to keep people together by
In his opinion, many marital counselors operate not on knowledge that true and statistically proven, but on marriage myths. Thus, Gottman wrote the article where he presented his scientifically analyzed observations of the married couples and proposed the rules of solid marriage. 2. What are the characteristics of good or “healthy” marriage?
This article adds to existing literature by further examining to rates of intimate
Yet, even though the code of ethics that guides the Marriage and Family Therapy profession is clearly defined, it is a binary code that paints ethical issues in black and white, not fully taking into account the unique circumstances of each client or the contexts in which they are situated. In my own work as a marriage and family therapist, I will endeavor to keep the spirit of the profession’s code of ethics in balance with the needs of each
The writer seemed to be very comfortable with the questionnaire part of the night. She compared the spark of intimacy to her early childhood. She says it is completely different meeting new people when one is an adolescent versus a levelheaded adult. The author did not feel uncomfortable until the questions about one another started. When asked questions like, “Tell your partner what you like about them; be very honest this time this time saying things you might not say to someone you’ve just met.
According to NASW Code of Ethics 1.09.c Sexual Relationships, “Social workers should not engage in sexual activities or sexual contact with former clients because of the potential for harm to the client”. However, the ACA Code of Ethics A.5.c. Sexual and/or Romantic Relationships with Former Clients states “sexual and/or romantic counselor-client interactions or relationships with former clients, their romantic partners, or their family members are prohibited for a period of 5 years following the past professional contact”. This particular difference was used because it is one which I feel the NASW Code of Ethics places complete and proper attention to the welfare of the client regards such relationships. I believe the presence of having a relationship with a client, even 5 years after ending professional services, still poses a harm to the client.
In her article “Will Your Marriage Last?”, Aviva Patz provides her understandings of Ted Hutson’s experient the Processes of Adaptation in Intimate Relationships (PAIR) Project. The experiment lasted a total of 13 years and focused on studying 168 couples and how their marriage can or cannot endure their time together. While being influenced by the research of Ted Hutson, Patz over emphasizes the lack of love and affection leading to divorce and does not take into consideration of outside forces such as disillusionment or infidelity among spouses. Patz first begins by explaining how Hutson’s research showed four major findings, one of which pushes the ideal that a continuous amount of love and affection is what is most crucial to the viability
When reading the IAMFC Code of Ethics and AAMFT Code of Ethics I found that they compare significantly, much more than they contrast. Many of the principals coincide. For example, the topic of multiple relationships is one of the many principles that parallel in many codes of ethics. The IAMFC Code of Ethics encourages family counselors to “avoid whenever possible multiple relationships, such as business, social, or sexual contacts with any current clients or family members” (Section A). Similarly, the AAMFT Code of Ethics also requires that therapists “make every effort to avoid conditions and multiple relationships with clients that could impair professional judgment or increase the risk of exploitation.
According to the ethics code, it is clear that all sexual roles in psychology are unethical and should be avoided (APA, 2002). The promise of Dr Andrea to have a relationship upon completion of treatment is above the code of ethics (APA, 2002, 3.05). Regardless of the mutual interest between the therapist and the patient, there are other factors involving boundary crossing. When the doctor agreed to treat Bob, a professional line was drawn and establishing another relationship complicated the roles. The doctor failed to comply with the code of ethics because the possible establishment of a conflict of interest would affect the method of
Women are better in personal relationship and have the ability to describe situations as
Effective relationships should be a common goal for all to strive for. The learner believes that there are four major signs that make us human; the need to love, the need to be loved, the need to be accepted and the need to be respected as an individual. None of these things can be accomplished alone, therefore, a relationship needs to be formed. The more effective the relationship the more these needs are able to be met. In the study of marriage and family we look into the areas that can either make or break relationships.