Some people think leadership is guiding and control others to complete tasks. On other hand, it motivates the people and influence them to do tasks effectively. Leadership can affect on productivity and communication. Leadership direct and influence on employee morale. Democratic leaders are open with employees. They influence others and share information with others. On the other hand, the autocratic are close. They do what they want. They do not share ideas with members. In this essay, I will talk about my personality in leadership. Mayrs briggs type indicators is INFJ.
My primary mode of living is focus internally. I take things in primarily by intuition that means dealing with things by how I feel with them. Alternatively, how they fit
…show more content…
I have the close numbers for each one. I got 8 for accommodating, 7 for collaborative, 6 for compromising, 5 for avoiding and 4 in competing. The highest one is accommodating that I focus on relationship needs, I sacrifice my own personal goals to satisfy others, yield to another point of view and I feel of people 's feeling. The advantages of the accommodating are to preserve harmony and avoiding disruption, take quick decision under pressure, and the relationship is the most important goal. Also, it is effective to preserve future relation with others. In addition, the close number from accommodating is collaborating. It is assertive and collaborative. It means that my partner and I reach and achieve both of goals. This is very effective in complex tasks where I need to find the best and quick solution. Also, it is effective way to make bigger space for many different ideas from different people. However, the lower conflict mode is competing. It is assertive and uncooperative. It is the opposite of accommodating. That mean you act in all ways to achieve your goals without seeking to cooperate with others. In brief, I agree with conflict modes that I am accommodating because I have story in this situation. For example, when I worked with my colleagues about final project, I always organize the work and give them the part, which they want it. However, in the one of our final project, I worked with someone who is competing. She wanted to be leader, but she did not distribute the tasks equally. She just wanted to do what she wants without take our ideas. She just show what the best of her, and ignored us. I got angry. After that, I decided with our members to change her ideas, and we created different ideas. The teacher was satisfied of our works, and we got full
According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, leadership is defined as "the power or ability to lead other people." In addition to this, leadership Is instructing a team with flexibility, hard work, inspiration. Leaders have equal importance in a team; they are neither above or below anyone. The role they play on the team is essential to achieving the task. Leadership means creating a blueprint of the steps needed and also including the input of others to improve the plan.
They try to smooth over or ignore conflict to keep everybody happy, they see conflict as destructive and will give in to others to maintain the peace (Page 38), Bryan is a very good Illustration of accommodation he sacrifice his needs for the group, he share’s his lunch with John, he writes the last easy for the group, he maintain peace among the group when john and andy was arguing. Even though bryan is trying trying to keep the peace in the group, he is has problems with himself and he sense unfairness and inequality throughout the film. Collaborating is a strategy is used in a I win, you win Situation. According to Patterson James “ The problem-solving or collaboration strategy is usually the best approach to win-win negations and the problem- solving strategy is usually the best way to cut through conflict. Make a decision and work toward win-win deals (page 41).
Diversity changes and challenges established norms and helps to evolve people, principles, and organizations. Leadership, both its understanding and execution, is affected by workplace diversity for a variety of reasons. In this short reflection, the focus will be how relational leadership compares and contrasts with other ideas, evaluating the four-step framework, and the three primary cultures of leadership. Finally, I will evaluate my workplace in light of these comparisons.
Source 1 Rubinsteim, J., Meyer, D. & Evans, J. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Authors of this journal - Rubinsteim, J., Meyer, D. & Evans, J from University of Michigan conducted very interesting and, on the other hand, very useful experiment, which consequences were required to identify difference between leader and manager, based on psychological study (Rubinsteim, 2001).
Compromising: A Half-Way Approach to Conflict Resolution Conflict styles come in different shapes and forms and each paint a picture of how an individual negotiates and resolves disputes. As it stands out from a questionnaire and assessments from others, I am a compromiser.
(Cherry, 2016) Autocratic leaders normally settle on decisions in view of their thoughts, ideas and judgments and rarely acknowledge guidance or advice from followers. Autocratic leadership includes absolute, authoritarian control over a gathering. primary characteristics of autocratic leadership include, practically no contribution from members, group leaders manage all the work method, strategies and procedures, group members are infrequently trusted with choices or important assignments or tasks and lastly leaders settle on the choices and decisions. Autocratic leadership can be advantageous at times but there are additionally many occasions where this style can be problematic.
Confrontation occurs when ill intent is present between two or more parties. This is followed by Truce, this is when each party is forced to interject a third-party to help resolve the confrontation. Collaboration is inclusive of the previous ill intent from the confrontation, however, but specific activities are accepted by both parties. Cooperation, the intent is neutral while activities are being planned and carried out. The process of interdependence involves both parties working actively towards the common goal of the conflict.
2.2 Types of Conflict: Human beings are social, living and working together. The peoples relations are compassion, cooperation, competition, argument, quarrelling and even fighting it depends on personalities and situations. Working in the same place means to be confront in a conflict because the peoples working together are from various personalities, backgrounds and have different views. Consequently, they are not able to avoid conflicts in the workplace.
There are many different views and perceptions on leadership and what it exactly means. This is because there are many different types of leaders and many different views on them. But the basic meaning of leadership is an individual who can select the right group of followers and influence them through their distinct gifts, abilities, skills and knowledge. A leader focuses on the follower and puts out a roadmap to the overall mission and vision; hereby the follower is influenced to willingly and enthusiastically in achieving the mission and vision. The leader achieves this influence by humbly delivering a visionary perception of the future in clear terms that resonates with the follower in terms of their believes and values.
Competing occurs when an individual pursues his or her own concerns and another person’s expense (Prause & Mujtaba, 2015). Accommodating conflict management is when a person neglects their own interest in favor of the other person or party involved in the conflict (Prause & Mujtaba, 2015). Avoiding conflict management is when a person is not worried about the outcome or the other person involved in the conflict. Collaborating conflict management occurs when conflict is solved so that both parties are happy with the outcome. Compromising conflict management occurs when the conflict is solved but it is only on a temporary basis (Prause & Mujtaba,
Individual Reflective Paper Introduction Leadership, a controversial concept, has been studied for centuries. Scholars who study leadership have argued with the insight of leadership for many decades and finally promote a wide range of understandings of it. This course “values and leadership” introduces the basic principles and concepts about leadership, and provides us with some conceptual knowledge and practical approaches to be an outstanding leaders. I chose to take this course because I am interested in the topic about leadership.
Effective relationships should be a common goal for all to strive for. The learner believes that there are four major signs that make us human; the need to love, the need to be loved, the need to be accepted and the need to be respected as an individual. None of these things can be accomplished alone, therefore, a relationship needs to be formed. The more effective the relationship the more these needs are able to be met. In the study of marriage and family we look into the areas that can either make or break relationships.
It is said that conflict is an inevitable part of every individual’s life and at some point every individual will come in contact with some type of conflict. According to Mitchell’s model of conflict, a conflict can be defined by two aspects, these being; behavior or attitudes towards a conflict. Mitchell developed his theory from a military view but it was suggested that conflict is not only an individual’s behavior or attitude towards a conflict but it can also be linked to incompatibility or “differences in issue position” which is known as ‘Positiondifferenzen’ ( Swanström & Weissmann , 2005) Therefore if conflict involves all of the above it can be defined as “intense interpersonal or intrapersonal dissonance between
Conflict can be created due to incompatible goals or which methods to use in order to achieve the goals. Conflict is a behaviour which has a purpose to hinder the achievement of a person’s goals (Mullins, 2005, p.96). Moreover, conflict disintegrates the normal and expected states of steadiness and harmony in an organization (Martin, 2005, p.746). In organizations there are types of conflict which may arise such as the intrapersonal, interpersonal,
In terms of academia, this year has been very important for me. I was accepted into the honours program in the Department of Psychology and I attribute this accomplishment directly to the time and effort I 've committed to my academic work for the past three years which has allowed me to obtain a very high grade point average thus subsequently being accepted in the program of my choice. That being said, I have developed many new and unique friendships and working relationships which I hope to maintain after I graduate. I have worked extremely hard this semester to maintain high grades. I am enrolled in three very time-consuming psychology classes to which I have devoted almost all of my time which has subsequently taken a toll on my social