Personal Narrative: A Jury Of My Peers
As I walk into the room filled with, “A jury of my peers”, I begin to question how fair or how biased we will all be. I am always one to question the system, but I know that I cannot do anything about the system itself, so I have to just go along with it, and follow the crowd. I guess my need to question everything is what I bring to the table of the jury room, although I may not have the courage to voice my opinions. I am sad to say that being on a jury is not a job that suits me well. I am not in any way patient, and I genuinely hate confrontation. I will avoid it at all costs. I also tend to show sympathy for people I know I should not show sympathy for. I, myself, am a doctor. I work in the emergency room at a hospital. There, everything is fast paced, which is the right speed for me.
I look across the room to scope out the people I will be spending the next few hours of my life with. I don’t know why, but I see them all as my competition, although I know there is no race to be won here. “Okay, let’s get
…show more content…
It’s not the most complicated of felonies. A man walked into a local grocery store, took out a gun, and told the cashier to give him all the money in the cash registers. This is easy. The cameras caught him in the act, and several witnesses identified the suspect. Later that day, the man was arrested by police. Nobody was hurt, and from watching the man during the trial, I really don’t think that he would have hurt anyone if the cashier did not give him the money. I begin to wonder why the man robbed the store in the first place. Did he need the money that badly? Was he living on the street? Again, I am feeling sympathy for a man who could have actually killed another person. I must stop myself from thinking any further because all of the facts are in front of me. This man committed a crime, regardless of his reasons. “I am calling for a vote”, the foreman says, “Everyone voting guilty raise your
Court Case Brief: Maryland Vs. Pringle
1242 Words | 5 PagesThe officer initiated a traffic stop and observed there were three men in the vehicle. The men were identified as the driver Partlow, and the passengers Pringle, and Smith. The officer asked Partlow for his license and registration. When Partlow opened his glove compartment to get his vehicle registration, the officer observed a large roll of money inside the compartment. He ran Partlow’s information for any wants or warrants and he came back negative for both.
Wendell Clayton Case Study
1593 Words | 7 PagesThe accused, Wendell Clayton, was found in possession of a loaded illegal handgun which is banned under Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46. A caller inside the coffee time store called 911 at about 1:22 reporting that there were around 10 black guys in the parking lot of The Million Dollar store, a strip club, across the street from him. The caller reported that certain individuals, 4 of the 10 black guys had guns on them and were openly displaying their handguns in the middle of the parking lot. Police immediately responded and within minutes the officers set up a roadblock in front of the exits to the location. As there were two entrances into the club’s parking lot, the officers positioned their vehicles so everything and anything harmful
Weymouth: A Case Study
353 Words | 2 PagesA man in Weymouth, Massachusetts is facing charges after he was caught using counterfeit money at a McDonald's on Main Street. The manager called the police after realizing that the money the man used was counterfeit. After the officers arrived on the scene, they confirmed that the money was fake. Police stated that the incident occurred on New Year's Day.
Austin Girth And The Springfield Square Massacre
352 Words | 2 PagesWe were short on money so we couldn't afford it. “I was just hungry” he claimed to the officers. But it all went downhill too fast and on the same night he was hung in the middle of our town square. We live in a fairly big town for being in the middle of America, but people around here can be cruel and have to work very hard for what they have. Needless to say stealing around here just doesn't happen.
What Is 12 Angry Men Jury Duty
1108 Words | 5 PagesJury duty is often regarded by most of society as a dull and tiresome obligation. Perhaps one would be inclined to change their assessment if jury duty meant you and eleven other men were the only thing standing between a boy and the electric chair. The teleplay Twelve Angry Men, written by Reginald Rose, tells the story of a 1950’s court case wherein a young man, under suspicion of murdering his father, faces the death penalty. The script centers around the twelve men of the jury as they decide whether or not the boy will live or die. As tensions start to run higher, the jurors get into intense arguments, sometimes letting outside biases overtake them.
Brief Summary Of Twelve Angry Men, By Reginald Rose
560 Words | 3 PagesWhen juror eight votes not guilty he caringly states “There were eleven votes for guilty it is not as easy for me to raise my hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it first.” Juror eight puts himself in the young defendants shoes when he sympathetically states “This boy has been kicked around his whole life... I think we owe him a few words that is all.” Not only did Juror eight replicate a sympathetic gentleman but he was also considerate. He was considerate not only to the young defendant but also to the other men on the jury.
12 Angry Men Flaws
939 Words | 4 PagesThe U.S. justice system is a concept that has come under scrutiny many times over the 200-plus years of its existence, but which still exists in much the same form today as when it was first devised. “12 Angry Men” by Reginald Rose is a theatrical drama that portrays many of the merits and faults of the jury-based judicial system. Some of the pros that are shown include how the input of many different people and backgrounds can result in a greater truth being uncovered, and how the voice of even a single man can be heard and considered by all jury members. Some cons that the play illustrates include how there can instances in which jury members merely go with the immediate popular opinion on the verdict, whether because they are susceptible to peer pressure or merely because they’d rather the case be over with as quickly as possible. Rose himself seems to be generally in favor of the current U.S. justice system, as the characters who represent the negative aspects of the system are shown to be hateful and irrational men, while the opposite is true for the people who represent the system’s more positive qualities.
Personal Narrative: Breaking A Social Norm
753 Words | 4 PagesThis psychological assignment requires us to break a social norm. In my case, I decided to break an appearance social norm. I thought in something weird, but at the same time really funny. Therefore, I entered to my little walking closet and I took the most brilliant and extravagant high heels shoes that I found to wear them at a place when people usually used flip flops.
Concept Of Jury Nullification
767 Words | 4 PagesThe concept of jury nullification is also gaining a lot of traction in modern media. In a recent case on the popular law-centric TV show How To Get Away With Murder, the lead character, criminal defense lawyer Annalise Keating, shed some light on the practice of jury nullification. During a case in which a son was being tried for the murder of his cop father who was abusing his mother, Annalise chose to heed the suggestion of one of her student assistants and decided to leak the information of the jury’s right to nullify the case. This, in turn, resulted in the defendant being found “not guilty” by the sympathetic jury, who felt that although the son had committed murder and was without a doubt guilty of committing said crime, he did not deserve to be punished for it.
Anthony Lopez Target Theft
1229 Words | 5 PagesINTRODUCTION: Suspect Michael Anthony Lopez DOB – 12/21/84 was arrested per PC 484(a) – Petty Theft after he walked inside the Target, grabbed and concealed the listed loss, and walked out carrying the loss and not paying for the merchandise. EVIDENCE: Item #1 – (1) clear glass pipe with a white colored residue inside the long cylindrical side resembling methamphetamine and a burned bulb on one end. (See attached evidence form and picture).
12 Angry Men Rhetorical Analysis
1186 Words | 5 PagesTwelve Angry Men is in many ways a love letter to the American legal justice system. We find here eleven men, swayed to conclusions by prejudices, past experience, and short-sightedness, challenged by one man who holds himself and his peers to a higher standard of justice, demanding that this marginalized member of society be given his due process. We see the jurors struggle between the two, seemingly conflicting, purposes of a jury, to punish the guilty and to protect the innocent. It proves, however, that the logic of the American trial-by-jury system does work.
Argumentative Essay On 12 Angry Men
549 Words | 3 PagesWhat if one day, twenty years from now you were chosen to discuss the fate of an eighteen year old boy. What would you do? Would you take your job and do it responsibly, or would you do it like some of the Jurors in 12 Angry Men and blow it off so you can finish early and leave. Even though there was a lot of controversy in that jury room, I noticed that Jurors 3,7, and 9 used their personalities, beliefs, and views of their responsibilities to bring the boy on trial to justice. This very excitable juror is the last to change his vote, and while his stubbornness could be seen as being based more on emotions than facts, he starts off with his little notebook with facts of the case and tries to insist that he has no personal feelings on the matter.
Juror 8 Character Analysis
1254 Words | 6 PagesA group of juror comprising of 12 men from diverse backgrounds began their early deliberations with 11 of ‘guilty’ and 1 of ‘not guilty’ verdicts. Juror 8 portrayed himself as a charismatic and high self-confident architect. Initially, Juror 1 who played the foreman positioned himself as self-appointed leader of the team in which has led his authority to be challenged as his leadership style lacked in drive and weak. In the contrary, Juror 8 is seen as the emergent leader considering his openness to probing conversations while remaining calm. Implying this openness to the present, it has become crucial that a good decision relies on knowledge, experience, thorough analysis and most importantly critical thinking.
Personal Narrative
269 Words | 2 PagesMy dad was as sick as a dog and laid on the warm couch on a freezing winter day. I ever so slowly went downstairs to ask my dad if we can go skiing. I thought for sure that my dad would say no. I went to the couch where my dad was covered in layers of blankets. I slowly asked my dad if we could go to Pando to ski.
Bicycle Thieves
776 Words | 4 PagesThe cop tells him that is not enough evidence, the thief has a community of people saying otherwise. The police, too, were proven to be no
More about Personal Narrative: A Jury Of My Peers
Court Case Brief: Maryland Vs. Pringle
1242 Words | 5 PagesWendell Clayton Case Study
1593 Words | 7 PagesWeymouth: A Case Study
353 Words | 2 PagesAustin Girth And The Springfield Square Massacre
352 Words | 2 PagesWhat Is 12 Angry Men Jury Duty
1108 Words | 5 PagesBrief Summary Of Twelve Angry Men, By Reginald Rose
560 Words | 3 Pages12 Angry Men Flaws
939 Words | 4 PagesPersonal Narrative: Breaking A Social Norm
753 Words | 4 PagesConcept Of Jury Nullification
767 Words | 4 PagesAnthony Lopez Target Theft
1229 Words | 5 Pages12 Angry Men Rhetorical Analysis
1186 Words | 5 PagesArgumentative Essay On 12 Angry Men
549 Words | 3 PagesJuror 8 Character Analysis
1254 Words | 6 PagesPersonal Narrative
269 Words | 2 PagesBicycle Thieves
776 Words | 4 Pages