Schools have the legal right to suppress your freedom of speech if it interferes with learning, as explained in “What Constitutes Free Speech for Students” when the author includes “1969 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, unless public school officials can show that language would “materially and substantially” interfere with discipline, they cannot censor students.” (“What Constitutes Free Speech for Students?” 1) So, was this students shorter skirt due to her high a real distraction? Now the entire ordeal of her having to be pulled out from her learning environment to change into much less appealing clothes in no way benefited anyone 's learning but prohibited the students learning with the added effect of her self of steam being destroyed. Ava is not the only example of enforced dress codes interfering with learning more than it benefits it, there are hundreds of thousands of these
Many people think that dress codes at school are limiting the children 's freedom of expression and others say that they are very necessary and constitutional. What are the benefits of school uniforms or preventing children from wearing what they want to wear on a daily basis. What evidence do the schools have in order to legally ban the students’ freedom of expression? School dress codes should not be enforced on the children in order to maintain an environment open to diversity. The responsibility remains with the school and the community as a whole to maintain an environment open to diversity and allow the students to confront ideas different from their own.
The teacher did not want him to draw an unusual house, she wanted a regular house, even if it wasn’t his grandfather’s. The narrator originally drew his grandfather’s house, but after his teacher rejected his drawing, he drew a regular house and got an A+ on his assignment. The narrator changed his drawing so he could get a good grade. He had to translate his drawing so it could be read by an adult mind. Being a child is both restricting and not, compared to adult life.
Father Flynn wants to keep Sister Aloysius and Sister James out of trouble. He wants the school to operate normally for the students, and he cares about the students. Father Flynn’s conversation with Sister James suggests that he did not tell Sister Aloysius because he wants to help Donald Muller. However, this position is flawed because Father Flynn does not want Monsignor Benedict to know his crime. He is trying to prove to Sister Aloysius that he is innocent but his action does not show it.
The "one tiny atom" symbolizes the realization that these "innocent" children are no so innocent. It is ironic the history teacher is trying to protect their innocence by withholding the truth about history; however, the children are unable to see the wrong in their actions, for learning history can prevent it from repeating. Once class was dismissed, there was a shift in the speaker 's tone. In addition, the speaker 's tone went from a sarcastic to a calm destructive tone. When the children
This means she wanted to break free of her addiction before she died. Instead of thinking of and treating African Americans as inferior, Mr. Raymond accepted them, causing him to be shunned by society. Even children had a disinclination towards him; their parents taught them that Dolphus's way of life was wrong. In the novel, Scout originally described him as "evil" (Lee 267). The text also states, "I didn't think Atticus would like it if we became friendly with Mr. Raymond, and I knew Aunt Alexandra wouldn't" (Lee 267).
The teacher came over and said “We are finished baking cupcakes, would you like to come to art class with us?” “My play time was scanty,” said Buford. The teacher said” You may do what you please. We will be in the art room if you change your mind.” Buford realized that he wasn 't going to have any fun by himself. Buford was glad he had detached from his game of soccer. There was only one problem.
School prayer is illegal, so having a school officiated prayer can lead to fines and other litigation. Not everyone agrees that school prayer should be banned however. Some say that banning prayer is illegal. They claim that, thanks to the first amendment, that prayer being banned is a violation of religious rights. Of course, banning prayer is illegal, which is why prayer is not banned, but prayer led by school officials or prayers officiated by the school are.
Title IX happens to propel discrimination, ironically. For example, Schuld writes that Title IX ignores the differences between men and women in interest level. The author claims that this damages men’s sports, even though the law is meant to protect the growth of everybody’s interest. Of course, the bill was written to protect and propel the growth of women’s sports and other opportunities in schooling, however, the bill is written that nobody may discriminate on the basis of any sex, not on the basis of being a girl. To further this point, “Men’s teams per school have dropped 17%... meanwhile… women’s teams per school rose 34%.” Schuld writes about the discrimination in hopes to show that schools are in a way, going against what Title IX stands for, just not in the way that many would expect.
So yes I can say I knew what plagiarism was but back then in elementary school we just used a different term for it; cheating. I define plagiarism as copying someone else’s work word to word and not giving then any credit. I believe that if I mention that the information that I was using is not my own work or idea then I shouldn’t be accused of plagiarism. With all said I who used to be an ESL student believe that the American River College plagiarism policy does not need any changing because even if someone doesn’t know what plagiarism is they still know what cheating and lying is. In the article “But I Changed Three words!