ipl-logo

Personal Narrative: The Compromise Of 1850

321 Words2 Pages

Our country is on the verge of disaster today. Provincial parties are seeking blood from one another. By being the kings of these radicals, Mr. Buchanan and Mr. Fremont do absolutely nothing but intensify the problem, which threatens to burst out into civil war. During my last serving as President, this very same argument over slavery loomed over us. I am fulfilled to say that I was able to bring to life the Compromise of 1850, thus diverting this calamity. God knows that I loathe slavery, but it is a standing issue, and we must tolerate it and protect it as given by the constitution. Under my government, the Fugitive Slave Act gave full power to the General Government to give runaways back to their owners. The issues in the Kansas Territory

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of This Republic Of Suffering: Death And The American Civil War

    972 Words  | 4 Pages

    Drew Gilpin Faust, wrote the book This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil War, this book was about the suffrage in the Civil War. Although more specifically the book goes in depth about the death of the ones who was in the war as well as the spiritual. Since this was back in the nineteenth century, they have not had the access to the medical technology that we do today. This then led to many deaths from “infections, disease in the camp, and that doctors did not have the knowledge to use clean instruments when treating a wound properly” (Faust 4). Though just from 1861 and 1865 it was estimated about 620,000 soldiers died in the Civil War, this is a time expand of approximately four years.

    Read More

  • F. H. Hodder The Authorsship Of The Compromise Of 1850

    734 Words  | 3 Pages

    The five "outstanding"(Hodder), questions in controversy were, the admission of California, the organization of the territories of Utah and New Mexico, the Texas boundary, slavery in the District of Columbia, and produce an

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of The South Must Strike While There Is Yet Time

    629 Words  | 3 Pages

    Written with fervour, Toombs articulates how Lincoln’s election dooms the South to have their culture overwritten by northern lawmakers. Dwelling on the issue of slavery, the speech presents the argument that the new Republican President would violate each citizen’s right to property as affirmed in the Constitution. Believing that Lincoln would undermine this principle, Toombs exclaims that Southerners “stand without a shield, with bare bosoms presented to our enemies.” (57) This allusion to the sectionalist divide that causes the Secession Crisis presents the Northern states as aggressors against the traditions of the South.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation

    882 Words  | 4 Pages

    Allen Guelzo and Vincent Harding approached Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation and the eventual abolition of slavery from two very different viewpoints. The major disagreement between them is whether the slaves freed themselves, or Abraham Lincoln and his Emancipation Proclamation freed them. Harding argued the former view, Guelzo took the later. When these essays are compared side by side Guelzo’s is stronger because, unlike Harding, he was able to keep his own views of American race relations out of the essay and presented an argument that was based on more than emotion. Allen Guelzo

    Read More

  • The Events Of Bleeding Kansas: Contested Liberty In The Civil War

    1227 Words  | 5 Pages

    The United States was a turbulent and politically divided place in 1850’s and leading up the Civil War. The Kansas Territory exemplified the treacherous nature of the U.S. experiencing all the issues that Congress tried to ignore in order to hold together the Union. Nicole Etcheson details the events in her book Bleeding Kansas: Contested Liberty in the Civil War Era. Most people used the name Bleeding Kansas to describe the violent atmosphere of the territory. The violence stemmed from Stephen A. Douglas’s idea of popular sovereignty that is allowing the people to vote on the admission of slavery into the state’s constitution.

    Read More

  • Missouri Compromise Of 1850

    597 Words  | 3 Pages

    By the 1800s Westward expansion had been transpiring significantly in the United States with the gaining of new territories through prominent occurrences including the Louisiana Purchase and the Mexican-American War. As new states were admitted into the union the imperative issue of slavery expansion arose as the states would have to decide if the new additions would utilize the institution of slavery. The preservation of the balance maintained between the number of slave states and free states was prevalent in constituting resolutions to the slavery issues. The issue of slavery expansion in the western territories repeatedly emerged, provoking conflict between Northerners and Southerners because of the balance of power shared between the northern, free states and the southern, slave states. Both sides feared one would become superior and, therefore, oppress the beliefs and abilities of the other side.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Watson Summary

    345 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Bank War, problems with Indians, and slavery were all examples used in the book to depict the political climate of the time period, and how parties were transformed. The book gave an overview of the era and placed Andrew Jackson as a character within the story of the development of America, not the focal point. This perspective is insightful because it shows that while Jackson was a major contributor to the era he is not the only force that determined the course of America. Therefore, it can be said that his ideas were not solely his, but were supported by other groups, which were produced based on the political climate described in the book. However, Jackson must be held accountable for his actions since he was the one who made them, even if the majority of people within the era agreed with his decisions and

    Read More

  • What Was The Significance Of The Compromise Of 1850

    702 Words  | 3 Pages

    10. Kansas-Nebraska Act – The Kansas-Nebraska Act split the Nebraska territory into two territories comprising of Nebraska and Kansas. They hoped that by doing this one state would be free and the other slave. They would decide what kind of state they would be through popular sovereignty. The act served to repeal the Missouri Compromise.

    Read More

  • To What Extent Was The Compromise Of 1850

    1583 Words  | 7 Pages

    It was difficult to agree on any conflict because Americans were on two completely different sides of the story. When this problem was noticed Henry Clay tried to give peace to the United States, unfortunately, his compromise only worked temporarily. Before the Compromise of 1850, the U.S. had just had a war with Mexico, and the slave controversy was getting more and more out of hand. The Free states, who have high industry income, do not think slavery is right and want it abolished. The Slave states want slaves, because of the amount of agriculture they have; they need people to do the work.

    Read More

  • Michael Holt The Fate Of Their Country Summary

    595 Words  | 3 Pages

    The fate of their country by Michael Holt is a book made up of 3 to 4 sections, titled  Pandora's Box, The Wilmot Proviso, The Compromise of 1850, The Kansas-Nebraska Act. Author Michael Holt examines what caused the Civil War and the Pandora’s Box of sectional dissent territorial slavery issue over slavery into all current and future western territories also the Missouri crisis debate. It wasn’t slavery per the book but the debates about the extension of slavery into new territories and states that sent the nation careening into civil war, argues writer Michael Holt. He gives his readers an analysis of the partisan political forces, on the great debate over the extension of slavery into the American West.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Continental Congress

    934 Words  | 4 Pages

    The first Continental Congress assembled in Carpenter’s Hall in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on September 5, 1774. One of the leading delegates was Joseph Galloway, a wealthy lawyer and member of the Pennsylvania Assembly. He was speaker of that colonial legislature from 1766 to 1775. Galloway was a chief exponent of a moderate position toward Great Britain, and he was opposed to the more radical and in flammatory pronouncements of people such as Samuel Adams of Massachusetts. At the Continental Congress he argued that the delegates were facing two break choices: restoring British-colonial relations to the way they were prior to 1763, which he argued was not possible, and total independence from Britain, which he did not support.

    Read More

  • James Oakes The Radical And The Republican

    947 Words  | 4 Pages

    Oakes’ masterful command of the broad literature of slavery, race, and the Civil War era allows him to trace the parallel journeys of two iconic American leaders. Oakes tells an absorbing and didactic story, shifting between accounts of Lincoln and Douglas and ending with their meetings in the White House. By portraying Douglas as a character of equal significance as Lincoln, Oakes not only provides insight into Douglas’s life but also enriches the study of Lincoln. The convergence of Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglas during the nation’s greatest crisis reveals “what can happen when progressive reformers and savvy politicians make common cause”

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Lincoln's Inaugural Address

    464 Words  | 2 Pages

    President Abraham Lincoln, in his inaugural address, addresses the topic of the civil war and its effects on the nation and argues that America could be unified once more. He supports his claim by using massive amounts of parallel structure and strong word choice. Lincoln ‘s purpose is to contemplate the effects of the civil war in order to unite the broken America once again. He adopts a very hopeful tone for his audience, the readers of the inaugural address and others interested in the topic of American history and the civil war.

    Read More

  • How Did Abraham Lincoln Deserve To Be The Great Emancipator

    695 Words  | 3 Pages

    Vu Pham Professor Sunshine McClain History 170 May 22, 2016 Abraham Lincoln Does Not Deserve To be The Great Emancipator Abolition of slavery was a big controversy in the United State of America in the nineteenth century due to the different stances between northern and southern states which led to the American Civil war. At the present time, Abraham Lincoln was the president of the United States who supported the north (Union) thought that free the slave could help him united all the states. As the result, he passed out the Emancipation Proclamation on September 22, 1862, which give freedom to slaves in the states that the Union did not control. After the war, he issued the Thirteenth Amendment on December 6, 1865, to free all slaves.

    Read More

  • The Truth In James E. Crisp's Sleuthing The Alamo

    871 Words  | 4 Pages

    The words seemed so unlike Houston.” Crisp believed that this speech he heard in its entirety in 1992 to be nothing like the man he grew up learning about in history as a child. He quotes Eugene C. Barker when questioning if the Revolution is the product of racial and political inheritances of the two sides, yet goes on to say this is not what he believes despite what others think. “It seemed to me that conflict between the two groups was not as much an immediate cause as it was an eventual consequence of Texas’s separation from Mexico.” (p. 41)

    Read More

More about Personal Narrative: The Compromise Of 1850

Open Document