There was a time, many years ago, when I was a budding young entrepreneur fighting the good fight. My father, Nerva, was a relatively young senator who adopted me out of the Roman Army when I was but a child. Grateful as I was, I worried for the health of my new father whose gray hair and tired face showed years of stress and many a sleepless night. The Montresor family was vast and powerful, and the name carried influence throughout the Empire was recognizable by friend and enemy alike across the globe. For the next year, I trained with generals and scholars alike – just about anyone my father could convince to prepare me for the Senate. Day after day, I sought to bring myself to a higher level than Nerva had ever achieved and bring change to the Empire. Yet, it …show more content…
Having a prior engagement meeting with a Captain in the Roman Army, I arrived late into the discussion. “…that cannot go ignored while we sit around here and do nothing!” exclaimed Titus “My dear Titus, I’m not proposing that we leave this threat unchecked. There must be another way to deal with this that doesn’t resort to sending the Army after them.” replied Hadrian. “There isn’t a way around it.” and unfamiliar voice called. I spun my head to face the source of the noise and found it to be no other than Fortunato. Having inherited his seat and fortune from his father, he was used to having everything his way, and didn’t often receive criticism. “Of course there is” I replied. “We managed to do the same thing for the southern pirates last winter. Now, they’re one of our greatest allies and defenses from attacks across the Mediterranean.” “Paying pirates to serve as our defense, that’s definitely a new one” Fortunato retorted. “It’s worked well so far. Profits have increased by nearly a third now that our ships are safe at sea, not to mention that everyone is protected from being attacked, especially the
It is astonishing how one man can take away another’s life so quickly and easily. It is alarming how one could argue that the murder of Julius Caesar was a group effort, when there is only one man who is behind this horrific feat of hatred. It is amazing how anyone could think that the killing of our powerful leader-to-be could be justified by any reasoning. Ladies and gentlemen, we are standing in the very same room as the murderer of the great Julius Caesar. May I direct your attention to the man guilty of this crime, Marcus Brutus.
California paid the pirates 20% of their budget so they would stop attacking them and keep peace with them. The 20% of their budget they paid the pirates protected there sips that had 10 billion + dollars on them. All of the money from america was being shipped to Europe because there was barely to no wars there. Europe has no war there so it's really safe. Europe, Britain and Spain all paid the pirates so they won't attack their ships, some ships had 10 billion + on them.
Tiberius Gracchus tried to help the common Roman people through his actions as a tribune in 133 B.C. by a familiar method, Agrarian reform. His proposals were met with out right rejections from the senate, but he ended up passing the law anyway. This action along with his announcing his illegal re-election bid for tribune according to Morey caused the senators to call-out “Tiberius as a traitor” ,but “the people extolled him as a patriot”. (1901) When election day came Tiberius Gracchus was murdered in the senate along with three-hundred of his followers by a group of senators led by Scipio Nasica.
Rome’s foreign policy lay with the senate and their military arm. “In all the preparations that are made for war, as well as in the whole administration in the field, they possess an almost absolute
In order to have Fortunato follow him home, Montresor asks if he can help him decide if what he bought was an Amontillado. Fortunato has a weakness as a connoisseurship in wine, and agrees to help his friend. Secondly, Montresor continuously mentions how Luchresi could assist Montresor if Fortunato could not. This angered Fortunato, and pushed him to keep going.
According to Broderick, Blewitt, (2015) there is no correct way to grief, everyone one deals with the loss of a loved one in their own ways. For example, recently my family has lost a member of our family, our beloved dog, Toby, died. Everyone in the family is handing Toby’s death differently, my mom and aunt and are looking at pictures of him and crying while my grandmother and I are trying to remember the good times we had, by swapping stories and experiences with him. This week I am working with a close-knit Italian-American family, which consists of Isabelle (wife/mother), Paul (oldest son), Sophia, and twins Lenore and Joseph. Recently this family has suffered the loss of Victor, the family patriarch, and Isabel's husband for 53 years.
As a writer at Gladiators Monthly, I am examining the historical accuracy of the movie Gladiator. There are aspects of Gladiator that do and do not hold true to the historical accuracy of the Romans under Commodus. This essay will show how the depiction of Commodus has both accurate and inaccurate qualities, while the portrayal of the Roman crowd determining the fate of the gladiators is quite accurate. In reality, Commodus did not kill his father, Marcus Aurelius, nor did he reign for such a short period of time.
Winston Churchill, on behalf of peace and security of the whole world, arranges a speech in which he argues that the United States and Britain must collaborate and mobilize their forces in preparation to resist the military assaults of Nazi Germany and its allies. The speaker emphasizes the cooperation between two nations, reassuring that this military act is reasonable and appropriate. In order to better persuade his audience, he uses a number of rhetorical questions, vocabularies and phrases that highlight his specific points and appeal to people’s emotion as well as reiteration to reinforce his argument. As stated, the author uses rhetorical questions, which are virtually ubiquitous within the writing.
“If you have tears, prepare to shed them now. You all do know this mantle. I remember The first time ever Caesar put it on. ’ Twas on a summer’s evening in his tent. That day he overcame the Nervii.
It seems that the fall of the Roman Republic was not a singular event that occurred instantaneously, but rather a long process that saw the increasing use of methods outside of Republican institutions to settle conflicts between members of the aristocracy over political power. Even as the Roman government transitioned form Kingdom to Republic and then to Empire, the competition between aristocratic families remained a relative constant in across the centuries. So too has the desire to mythologize the past. The romans attributed both the fall of the Kingdom of Rome and the fall of the Roman Republic to moral rot, while a more reasonable assessment might place the blame on a dissatisfied and competitive elite class and an inefficient and unresponsive governmental system that was unwilling or unable to address their concerns. In much the same way, modern observers of the Roman Republic have tended to mythologize the fall of the Republic in the service of creating a moral narrative about the unconscionable tyranny of Cesar and the righteousness of the Senate, or whatever alternative narrative is befitting of the historical moment and audience.
The Life of Marius, written by Plutarch, is a fascinating ancient source detailing the career of the Roman Gaius Marius, 127-86BC. While there are interpretive and reliability issues, the Life of Marius is a particularly useful and significant source. It is our only extensive primary source on Marius, who was a key political figure of late Republican Rome. Additionally, Plutarch’s work indicates not only many crucial military and political development in Rome in the time period, but also gives a reflection of Plutarch’s own Rome and its values and political climate.
Wake up. I’ve noticed many such calls to action left where I would find them. Is Rome going to ... etc. ”(II, i, 46-49) to what he responds accurately expressing this trait, ““Is this asking me to speak and strike? Oh, Rome, I promise you, if you’re meant to receive justice, you’ll receive it by my hand!”
Brutus, Cassius and Mark Antony were aware of the fact that if the plebeians sided with them, they would hold all the power. Yet the plebeians were still ignorant of this fact. Although, they were unable to recognize the potential in their ability to unify. The possibilities that their unification could portray were endless
Ha! Ha!—he! he!—a very good joke indeed—an excellent jest. We will have many a rich laugh about it” (23). Yet, unfortunately for Fortunato, it is not a joke at all.
”This quote highlights the arrogance and warlike nature the Romans developed, and the paradigm shift that the Roman Empire endured culminating from “Pax