As someone who has been living for only 17 years, there have been instances where I have questioned myself and society as a whole. I have tried to seek answers and tried to find myself through my conscience and my life. The meaning of life has been a mystery to me, and I want to explore through experimentation and creation. I seek the mysteries of the world, especially how human nature connects with a formulated society. I want to figure out why humanity is how it is and what I can do to change the darker side of it; I wonder about questions AND answers and how they affect who I am today as well and who I will be in the future. I am a human. A human who has many questions about why things happen in the world and what affects what. I wonder about my life span and what I will do in the future with that certain amount of time. I wonder about my death and what I am going to do so I can end happily. I wonder about my regrets and how I am going to heal the guilt. I wonder about subjects like why most of our thoughts are about trivial things which seem so small but mean a lot to us: like physical appearance or money. And I also wonder about what I am going to do to change society’s ways. As a society, there are rules. The …show more content…
There are an infinite amount of puzzle pieces that the audience is trying to originate. In the end, there is supposed to be a big picture and the satisfaction of completion; but my puzzle pieces are not supposed to be put together, and if it were to be together, it would just be a blank picture. There are millions of pieces that somehow connect to each other, but the only reason that they are not connecting is because there is a chaotic amount of sections to be solved. That is the world today; an endless commotion of blank pieces that create an even larger blank space. And my future goal is to find a way to put all those pieces together to construct something
People often find the need to seek the meaning of life. They feel as though there has to be more to life or that they are blinded to something vital in the grand scheme of things. Different people use different means, some go on grand journeys hoping to find some sort of wisdom in their experience. This is where we find a parallel in the lives of Chris McCandless and Siddhartha, the main characters of Into the wild by Jon Krakauer and Siddhartha by Hermann Hesse. In both stories the main character lives a well off life but becomes dissatisfied by societal conventions.
In the book Anthem their society is way different from ours. They are not allowed to be individual or say the word “I”. They can’t have names, instead they are in groups and have group names. They all have a part in society like their jobs and things they do. For example the equality group belong to the street sweepers.
Equality was a creator his mind had driven him to science he had his own mind, his own strength, and his own courage he was independent, he was brighter than the rest. Standing alone in a modern world ruled by the suppressed government he faced the world alone. In a world where being intellectual was a severe sin he possessed gifts unlike no other that were despised by the government: intellectual and psychological strength. In a world where free will was not allowed and any form of diversity was punished by the authorities. Here we find Equality on a path of self-discovery and independence.
The issue concerning the concept of certainty hindering the advancement of mankind is pressing for a positive change. Just as darkness can be liberated through light, the blindness of certainty can be relieved through the glasses of doubt. However, it is argued that "powerful beliefs" and confidence in ones aspirations are important in accomplishing deeds others may feel are near "impossible." This certainty people may feel in themselves can often be the deciding factor of how crucial situations will play out, often times what mindset one walks into a situation dictates the outcome.
Over the last fifteen years, I have grown mentally and socially. I credit my growth to my ability to analyze and understand the world for what it is. Social imagination is the use of information to understand the world and ourselves for who we are. Possessing the quality of mind that can develop reason and the capacity to shift perspectives are the basis of social imagination (Mills 2000). As I mentioned in reflection one, I came to realize that my way of thinking is what helped me overcome living a poor lifestyle.
Could you imagine living in a world where you were not your own individual? In the book Anthem, by Ayn Rand, everyone is the same and no one can be “better” or more intelligent than each other. In this book, the characters can not even speak the word “I” without getting executed. Think about having rules that restrict individuals from having their own thoughts, ideas, and opinions. In the book Anthem, the readers will discover that these rules and restrictions become a reality.
It is fundamental to revamp and ameliorate the mistaken knowledge that we hold in our minds, and welcome change into the world that we
Have you ever wondered why life was created and what your purpose is? Well, you probably have, you just don’t remember it. We ask ourselves a variety of questions every day. It might be a simple or hard question you are facing throughout the day, but the answer is the main thing you need to remember. The meaning of life is more than just a simple question like the others we ask ourselves.
This paper describes and analyzes a life review interview with an older adult. The purpose of this paper is to discuss, record and reflect on an older adult’s life in order to evaluate them on the last stage of Erik Erickson’s theory of psychosocial development; integrity versus despair. This paper will also focus on the elements of a life review as well as the reflections of the interview on the part of the author. JC is a seventy-seven year old white male who lives by himself in New York City. He was born in London, England, and was an only child.
Individuals reported a change in their values and attitudes about life (Ring, 1982). They also gained a deeper belief in love and altruism (Ring, 1982). Many people concluded that they indeed had purpose in life and knew without a doubt that the NDE was meant to act as a “wake-up call” (Ring, 1982). Individuals reported having a deeper understanding of their purpose in life. This purpose always included living “more deeply, more appreciatively, more lovingly, and more spiritually”
Leading a human life is a full-time occupation, to which everyone devotes decades of intense concern.” (Nagel, 719) Nagel also argues that we all reflect about whether life is worth it or not. To avoid this this absurdity, we try to give meaning to our lives through what we do “seeking fulfillment in service to society, the state, the revolution, the progress of history, the advance of science, or religion and the glory of God.” (Nagel, 720) But this leads to the conflict that if this thing that gives meaning to our life, it must be significant.
That is our choice the way we live our temporary life and the way we make it meaningful for ourselves What is the meaning of life? Why we exist here? What are we living for? These questions are asked, discussed and argued by many philosophers around the world to look for a significance of people’s living or existence in general.
Then there’s the question, what does it mean to be human? We are a part of someone much greater than we realized. Some might say who cares? Alone we will determine not only our fate, but our children, grandchildren, and so on. It’s a heavy burden to carry however, it is what is to be expected.
How does someone know if they are truly happy? Much of society have come to associate happiness with the pursuits of personal pleasures or that which makes us “feels good”. When we feel good we display positive expression of emotions such as joy, laughter, kindness and fewer negative emotions such as anger, hate, and sadness. To some people our happiness is already determined through our genes. Some people seek happiness through money and material possessions.
I believe people over think this question too much, I mean I get it, the question itself is vague and arises other questions. Even the word "meaning ", makes you think. But if we mean "the purpose of life. Then to me it 's not complex at all.