Personification In Bush's Speech
The use of language is always manipulated to convey a goal of the speaker in order to have an effect on the hearer. Personification is a linguistic figure that is based on describing a word with the use of another word that in other contexts would be a word that is used to define a person. The use of the word that is defining a person-like quality or action should define a word that is normally not associated with a person-like attribute or action. Personifications arouse our attitudes, feelings and beliefs about a given subject. The typical reasoning for using personifications is “either to arouse empathy for a social group, ideology or belief evaluated as heroic, or to arouse opposition towards a social group, ideology or belief that is evaluated …show more content…
The use of the term friend(s) is metaphorical in the sense that it is a term describing relations between humans, transferred to describe relations between nations and organizations. In all the cited examples, America had been transferred the positive connotations of the words “friends” and “friendship” whereas the enemy is linked to the negative emotion of hatred “The regime […] has a deep hatred for America and our friends”. These metaphors serve, first, as a personification fitting the “United We Stand” political myth and, second, as an appeal for uniting legitimization for the War on …show more content…
Preemption typically means attacking an enemy before he attacks you. But preemption in the Bush administration’s sense is more accurately understood as “preventive war.” The president remains unapologetic for challenging this understanding. In June 2002 he told West Point cadets that: If we wait for threats to fully materialize, we will have waited too long […] we must take the battle to the enemy, disrupt his plans and confront the worst threats before they emerge. In the world we have entered, the only path to safety is the path of action. And this nation will act. Bush administration’s preventive war is intertwined with the second principle of the Bush doctrine that is to say, that of spreading of US’ democratic values. The decision to remove the Iraqi president Saddam Hussein from power went beyond simply eliminating a possible threat. In fact, it was intended to dislodge a tyrant and establish a democratic government in Iraq; in Bush’s
Blood Of Tyrants Summary
1036 Words | 5 PagesAt least consider our first commander in chief’s principles when searching for an answer . Constrains and empowers contemporary occupants of the oval office.
Rhetorical Analysis On Syrian Rebels
539 Words | 3 PagesRhetorical Analysis The article “Arming Syrian rebels: Where the US went wrong” was written by Tara McKelvey. McKelvey is a features writer at BBC News in Washington, a senior editor at the Prospect, and a research fellow at NYU School of Law 's Center on Law and Security. Her article is an interview-based contrast that brings up the arguments that took place inside the US government lobbies concerning the Syrian crisis and how these arguments led the Obama administration to react in support of the Syrian opposition. Tara’s interview with Robert Ford, the former US ambassador to Syria, makes a strong case to fault the US decision of supporting the Syrian rebels.
Summary Of Ronnie Lipschutz's 'Constitution Of Imperium'
1106 Words | 5 PagesIn three of his chapters, entitled “Homeland,” “Exception?”, and “Dollarama,” Lipschutz explains why and how the US has been building its imperium since 9/11, and opens up the topic to further discussion. Overall, I believe that Lipschutz does a thorough job of introducing challenging opinions and theories on the US’ actions since WWII, however, he raises many questions that have no correct answer, making his book a debatable and thought provoking read. In this essay I will reflect on the strengths and weaknesses in Lipschutz’s arguments about protecting the homeland, justifying the Global War on Terror, and the US’ overall efforts to build
Andrew Bacevich's The Washington Rules
1587 Words | 7 PagesAmerica with open arms has accepted the role of the world’s police. It could be argued that it created the role for itself. That is the premise of Andrew Bacevich’s Washington Rules. Bacevich discusses over sixty years of American Foreign Policy, from Truman to now, to explain the premise of the “Washington Rules.” The Washington Rules is about American militarist belief that Americans must “lead, save, liberate, and ultimately transform the world”, this could only be accomplished by an idea described by Bacevich as “the sacred trinity”.
Guy Zuv's US Foreign Policy
766 Words | 4 PagesThe first chapters of Guy Zuv’s U.S. Foreign Policy and Hook & Spaniers American Foreign Policy Since World War II talk about the ideology behind the way the United States engages in it’s foreign policy. These chapters show the basis of our thinking when it comes to interactions with different countries either through diplomacy or military actions. They also show the history of our foreign policy and the influencing environment it was founded in. Reflecting on these chapters gives insight into why the U.S. has this unusual behavior when dealing with foreign policy as well as to why we have such a problematic relationship with many countries around the world. One of the major observations we see in our foreign policy is how it’s fluctuates
Elie Wiesel's The Perils Of Indifference
1526 Words | 7 PagesIn the rhetorical speech The Perils of Indifference Elie Wiesel encourages American Politicians to declare war against the inhumanity of indifference. Contextually speaking Elie Wiesel’s presented this speech on April 12, 1999 in the East Room of the White House as part of a Millennium Lecture Series hosted by the president. Wiesel’s speech falls within the 20th Century Human Rights Movement. Interestingly enough, before Professor Wiesel gave his speech The Kosovo war was at a new height regarding the disputed piece of land in southeast Europe. Eventually though NATO persuaded militaries from intervening in the process.
Rhetorical Devices In George W. Bush's 9/11 Speech
697 Words | 3 PagesDo you remember the day that changed America forever? Two hijacked planes crashed into the side of the Twin Towers in New York City killing thousands. Another plane went into the pentagon and the last was stopped before it got to its destination. In the afternoon of September 11, 2001 George W. Bush delivered a speech that gave relief to the American people after the massacre. This was a disturbing moment in our history that shook the very foundation of America.
Bush Doctrine Vs American Doctrine
2420 Words | 10 PagesOver time, the president’s executive power has dramatically increased in cases of emergency and war. One such case is that of George W. Bush and his stance of preemptive strikes on Iraq known as the Bush Doctrine. The doctrine was met with much support, however, caused much controversy later. The Bush Doctrine, although allowed, was in violation of the Constitution and lacked approval from congress.
Rhetorical Analysis Of Bush's Inauguration
170 Words | 1 PagesThe president was surround from the crowd from the moment he took the office. The candidate from the Republican who had won with a vote and was opposed by other candidates , voters , particularly by Democrats party. Therefore, the president wrote his inauguration to addressed and to protected to swearing to the common citizens of the nation. In his Inauguration, the president George W. Bush called for national unity. “ America has never been united by blood or soil.
The American Century Essay
910 Words | 4 PagesA debate that has plagued American society is whether the United States, with its immense militaristic and economic power, has a moral obligation to intervene in cases of tyranny or extreme humanitarian crises. In “The American Century,” Henry Luce argues that America has such a duty and advocates for intervention to fight Nazi tyranny and spread democratic ideals. Many continue to argue for such humanitarian intervention today in cases like Syria and ISIS, but others have an opposing view. For example, Russian President Vladimir Putin expressed concern when the United States debated intervening in Syria in “A Plea for Caution.” Putin contends that intervention in Syria and American interventionism in general is often immoral, and many share
Rhetorical Analysis Of Churchill's Impending Doom To Victory
568 Words | 3 PagesPersonification boosts emotion towards something that emotion is not usually felt towards. “During her long ordeal London was upheld by the sympathy and admiration of the other great cities…,” which makes one feel congratulatory towards something that cannot even feel congratulation (Do Your Worst). The reason for using personification in politics is for a national cause to better resonate within the listener. One will begin to root for London when he hears that “London will be ready, London will not flinch, London can take it again” (Do Your Worst). Personification is a way to motivate a listener to fight for a cause that is close to them in the sense that the cause is given human characteristics to relate to the
Rhetorical Analysis Of George W Bush 9/11 Speech
805 Words | 4 PagesAfter the 9/11 attacks, America was devastated and distraught. America was in need of a leader. We needed someone to take us in and protect us, to make us feel safe again. George W. Bush (our president at this time) acted as our protector. He comforted America with his sympathetic words, but also managed to bring forth fear to the terrorist.
Truman Defense Policy Analysis
1097 Words | 5 Pages“The defense policy of the United States is based on a simple premise: The United States does not start fights. We will never be an aggressor. We maintain our strength in order to deter and defend against aggression -- to preserve freedom and peace. Since the dawn of the atomic age, we've sought to reduce the risk of war by maintaining a strong deterrent and by seeking genuine arms control. ‘Deterrence’ means simply this: making sure any adversary who thinks about attacking the United States, or our allies, or our vital interests, concludes that the risks to him outweigh any potential gains.
Rhetorical Analysis Of George W. Bush's 9/11 Speech
797 Words | 4 PagesPresident Bush uses appeal to authority when he says “Our military is powerful, and it’s prepared.” The Fallacies in the second part of the speech did help to persuade the audience because they showed the audience that the United States Government would defend what happened to them on that
The Modern Conservatism Movement
419 Words | 2 PagesBush’s consideration of a stronger national defense was evident after he “vowed to go to war even without congressional
More about Personification In Bush's Speech
Blood Of Tyrants Summary
1036 Words | 5 PagesRhetorical Analysis On Syrian Rebels
539 Words | 3 PagesSummary Of Ronnie Lipschutz's 'Constitution Of Imperium'
1106 Words | 5 PagesAndrew Bacevich's The Washington Rules
1587 Words | 7 PagesGuy Zuv's US Foreign Policy
766 Words | 4 PagesElie Wiesel's The Perils Of Indifference
1526 Words | 7 PagesRhetorical Devices In George W. Bush's 9/11 Speech
697 Words | 3 PagesBush Doctrine Vs American Doctrine
2420 Words | 10 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Bush's Inauguration
170 Words | 1 PagesThe American Century Essay
910 Words | 4 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Churchill's Impending Doom To Victory
568 Words | 3 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of George W Bush 9/11 Speech
805 Words | 4 PagesTruman Defense Policy Analysis
1097 Words | 5 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of George W. Bush's 9/11 Speech
797 Words | 4 PagesThe Modern Conservatism Movement
419 Words | 2 Pages