There is different pros for animal testing, including helping researchers to find drugs and treatments, help ensure the safety of drugs, there are no other testing alternatives, and it provides an opportunity to examine a complete life cycle. “The major pro for animal testing is that it aids researchers in finding drugs and treatments to improve health and medicine. Many medical treatments have been made possible by animal testing, including cancer and HIV drugs, insulin, antibiotics, vaccines and many more” (Murnaghan). “Another important aspect to note is that animal testing helps to ensure the safety of
Animal testing is a controversial subject, with supporters pointing out the medical advances that have stemmed from animal research and animal rights activists declaring it cruel and immoral. However, both sides agree that it would be beneficial to reduce animal suffering by finding alternatives to this practice. On one side of the spectrum, supporters of animal testing point out how valuable the practice is to scientists, and the medical advances that have stemmed from animal research. According to the Foundation for Biomedical Research (FBR), “…practically every drug, treatment, medical device, diagnostic tool or cure we have today was developed with the help of lab animals” (“Benefits of Biomedical Research”). The FBR is clearly stating that, without the help of animal testing, medical advances would be nearly impossible.
Instead of being required to pay for, feed, and environment of a living animal, scientists have the possibility to apply computer systems as an alternative. “These robots can be in labs as soon as subsequent 12 months (Goldman)”. There are numerous different approaches an animal can be replaced in the laboratory, which include: using mathematical information, the use of biopsies from human beings in place of animal autopsies, making human tissue cultures to test vaccines, and lots of greater (“research alternatives”). Scientists have a huge range of alternatives available to them. therefore, animal testing for clinical advancement is not a preference for most
Therefore, people can gain advantage using animals. Moreover, Heffner pointed out that “[animal experimentation] benefits humans, which in turn benefits lab animals” (72). For example, the author points out a laboratory is more secure than in the wild (Heffner 75). In the wild, animals suffer to find food and shelter and so on, so the mortality rate is high. However, in the laboratories, animals do not have to worry about that because people will take care of them.
Collier also states, “Rodent brains are made of the same mechanisms as human brains — the same kind of cells, the same kind of neurotransmitters or chemicals”(Collier 40), to give the readers more crucial evidence as to why animal research is necessary. One tends to pay more mind to issues that can possibly affect them in a negative way, Collier does well with capturing the reader 's attention when mentioning human health. In modern day, animal research is seen as cruel and undergoes tons of criticism. Collier covers many animal harm concerns by stating, “When there is potential for pain — for example an experiment that involves surgery — researchers use anesthetics and analgesics”(Collier 40). Collier then comforts ones concern for animal safety by mentioning, “All of our research is supervised by practicing veterinarians who know the state of the art.
“It can produce a larger amount of animal population.” Cloning can both sides on how to create animals with identical genetics. What I mean by this is that they can make identical genetics but it can be difficult. This is a good thing because all animals will have the same healthy genes. They will have nice animals that will be healthy and they won’t have to worry about having any sick animals. “It can be a way to quickly create more sources of food, especially meat.” By having more animal
These animals were either killed or subsequently euthanized. They also assert that animal testing involves the inflicting distress, pain or even death of animals in the name of medical and academic research. Similarly, Cochrane(2007) notes that most of the experiments conducted on animals are painful and sometimes worsen the animal’s quality of life. During the experimentation process the scientists
Some people hate rodents including mice and rats, but using them for testing is not okay. Horses, cats, dogs, bird and even fish are now used in testings. These animals were just a few of the hundreds used for the research and testing. Animal testing should be prohibited because it’s cruel and inhumane, animals are being tortured while in those labs, and the experiments are wasting animals
Even with all of the outcry, there is a large group of people that see animal experimentation as a necessary evil. Many see it as “ total elimination of animal testing will significantly set back the development of essential medical devices, medicines, and treatment” (Hajar 7). Animal testing is a necessary evil that has been extremely beneficial to humans and is crucial to the advancement of medicine in the
In this circumstance many animal lovers are always worried about animals that are being killed due to animal testing. Yes, there are other alternatives such as using a human’s cell, computer models, etc. instead of killing animals. Also, animal testing is not always reliable and can’t predict how a human will react once being used on. But animal testing helps out everyone, whether people like it or not.
They state that animals are subject to dreadful conditions, in the sense that they are restricted from daily activities. According to Humane Society International, "animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, the infliction
Those animals are subjected to this cruelty for the sole purpose of being used in classroom teaching, despite alternative teaching methods being available that have been reported as being more effective and actually saves the schools money. Supporters of animal testing will argue that in the past, most medical breakthroughs involved some form of animal research. That is true. Experimental drug testing on animals was a successful way of discovering cures for diseases in the past. An excellent example is the discovery of insulin to treat diabetes.
Personally, I stand for the use of animal testing as a beneficiary of science and human products. This relief of human suffering has been highly debated for many years. Animal testing has been a controversial topic that many companies and activists either strongly fight against or stand for. As previously mentioned, animal testing has assisted in scientific research to develop new products and vaccinations. For
The animal testing controversy has been a big one, it is no way beneficial to society nor is it humane for animals. Animals are subjected to excruciating experiments daily. Countries such as Israel and India have stopped animal testing as well as Britain. “…countless animals are experimented on and then killed…” (Murnaghan 1). Animals are subjected to confined rooms all of their lives, used in painful experiments and then disposed of as if they are an inanimate object.