Persuasive Essay About Eating Locally

Similarly, using stainless steel water bottles instead of plastic water bottles would also help the environment. Plastic items usually take about 10-1000 years to decompose in landfills. Additionally, plugging my cell-phone and laptop chargers out, and turning off the electrical appliances when not in use would also reduce the ecological footprint. Furthermore, eating organic and locally produced food instead of packaged foods would also reduce the ecological footprint.

In other countries it is not required to label if it is a GMO or not, so they are not informing the consumer what they are buying. These consumers want to what is inside the food that they are buying. However, not everyone is against GMOs, many people are for it as they see beneficial side. They believe that with technology these food will improve in the future and all of the disadvantages will be eliminated. Also GMO can be made to be more nutritional and be modified to grow in harsh conditions which will be very beneficial in places in places such as Africa where the soil is not the best.

The amount of food wasted in United States can build 35 World Trade Centre as 1 World Trade Center only cost around $3.8 billion (Brown, 2012). When our surrounding was polluted by the food waste, the government will spend a lot of money to solve this problem and this thing increase economic burden. We should make a right choice and think wisely before buying foods to avoid food waste. Food waste problem should be handle seriously as food waste increase economic

The lack of pesticide, which is actually known to harm humans, produces a healthier product. Any GMOs which are engineered to produce their own pesticide produce toxin which is only harmful to certain insects, and not to humans, and so they are harmless. This is not to say that scientists could not make a harmful GMO crops, they have the capacity to do so, however any new crop which is meant to be consumed by humans goes through extensive testing by numerous agencies including the USDA, the FDA, and the EPA. After these tests the crop is either approved or denied, and only if it is approved and deemed safe is it allowed to be sold to the

Even with the “healthy” options most school supply is packed with harmful preservatives and chemicals that harm our youth from buying the cheapest possible edible green thing. As a country does not seem to want to invest into healthy and better futures for our young people. The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act is supposed to make the food healthier than it used to be, which means there should be more fruits and vegetables. While they may have more healthy foods, the foods are sometimes gross looking.

Without it, low and no-income families don’t have the means to get the nutrition and quality of food they need. The United States should continue this program because it is solving some of the problems poverty and hunger present. SNAP also allows people of all socioeconomic classes to have the same spending capacity when purchasing groceries, and that means a lot for the less

Organic foods should not be considered worthwhile. Organic foods today at the store could cost up to 300% more than our average conventionally grown food. Many consumers today do not pay for these organic foods because of what the cost of a organic label is compared to a normal grown food, and how there is little difference in them. The price of just buying food with it saying that is organic can cost more than just buying the normal brand.

Wealthier communities tend to buy foods that are expensive and those that are healthier for them to eat. Eating nutritious foods makes them reduce the risk of getting a chronic disease. Wealthier communities are more surrounded by organic, healthier whole foods. Families in low-income households tend to buy foods from fast food restaurants and more processed foods because the neighborhoods they live in tend to not have fresh produce available to them due to the poor community that they live in. Grocery stores containing fresh produce are not available to those living in poor communities.

Farmers who choose to sustain the traditional way of farming techniques prefer to grow organic produce over genetically engineered crops while maintaining a successful business. Large corporations, on the contrary, benefit largely whilst using less energy by enduring larger profits with the aid of genetically modified food. Settling with locally produced organic produce is not only beneficial for consumer but also but also it could economically help hardworking local laborers(farmers) so that they may continue to grow and harvest their crops the way nature intended. Studies claim that biotechnology is no threat and are as safe, yet many questions remain in the minds of many consumers. Genetically modified foods are the new trend of a sustainable source of food and should be allowed in all countries because GMO’s are vastly comparable to

A “healthy lifestyle” is not necessarily easy to obtain, yet one could make it easier on themselves, making a point to buy the healthy and affordable food, yes such a thing does exist. As a matter of fact, healthy meals can be found online and nutrition labels can be searched in depth with a click of a button these days. So the question that comes to mind would be, why do more people today develop health issues then just twenty years ago when internet was not nearly as accessible? Likewise, simplistic, whole foods are almost always less expensive, take many fruits as an example.

Locavores are misinformed idealist who believe in changing the world by eating locally. They believe by eating locally, they are improving their carbon footprint, help the local economy, and creating a more nutritional diet. However, locavores are ignorant of many situations such as many people’s lives depend on trade and that many places are not suitable for farming. Even though a locavore’s heart is heading in the right direction, but their efforts are misguided.

“By focusing on transportation, they overlook other energy-hogging factors in food production.” (McWilliams). The locavore movement supporters do care about other energy-hogging factors. In fact, eating local produce is better for the air quality and pollution in the air than trying different ways to eat healthier such as trying to eat organic; “Eating local is better for air quality and pollution than eating organic.”

The consumption of red meat has increased significantly in recent years. The link between red meat consumption and climate change is greatly evident. Therefore, this issue may be considered positive for various stakeholders, while also having a negative impact on others. Not only is the consumption of meat a major contributor to climate change, but the production of the meat consumed influences the climate as well. Livestock produces a considerable amount of greenhouse gases such as methane and nitrous oxide, which accounts for more than 18% of greenhouse gas emissions.

Is Space Exploration Worth it? Do you want to stay here forever? The question of space exploration has lingered inside everyone’s mind since the Space Race and humans looked to the stars. Humankind exploring our interstellar neighborhood in inevitable and beneficial.

Farmer’s markets allow families to experience the culture and passions of local merchants, farmers, and friends through freshly produced foods. In these communities, people buy nutritious goods difficult to find in their local grocery stores. For the past decade, the locavore movement has influenced and convinced many people to eat locally grown products as much as possible because they claim it preserves the environment. However, many people disagree with this movement stating even though it supports local farmers, it hurts farmers in other places. They also say it ignores economies of scale involving good miles.