The article stated, “Prefacing his truth-telling, Shapiro warned: ‘This is going to be mildly graphic,’ he said, ‘but it’s important because I’m sick of euphemisms; It’s not aborting a fetus; it’s not getting rid of a ball of tissue,” As Shapiro defined later in the video, abortion is the murder of “literally the most innocent among us.” Many people say that a woman has a right to choose when she has a baby. Or in other words, she has the right to murder the child that is forming inside of her. Why should a woman be able to kill the baby that she is carrying? That unborn child has done nothing wrong to compel somebody to kill it. They say it is a woman’s right to have a choice about their reproductive systems.
Did you know that about 22 million unsafe and illegalized abortions take place every year all over the world? And about 50 thousand women die due to these unsafe abortions? Abortion is the procedure of losing the fetus, whether naturally due to medical issues or by a mother’s or parents’ will. It is a debate that never comes to a resolution as people’s opinions and perspectives differ according to their beliefs, education, and upbringing. Various opinions that are worth thinking and considering exists in the argument of abortion although it is religiously refused, medically unsafe, and irresponsible, some people still regard it as a woman’s right.
Out of all pregnancies 4 in 10 babies are aborted. There are roughly 57 million unborn children that are killed in the U.S. alone. That is about 155 babies per hour and around 1 every 24 seconds. Some may disagree, but abortion is wrong for these reasons it is murder and murder is illegal, years after the abortion they will regret having the abortion and the woman may end up psychologically harmed. The first reason why it is wrong is it is murder because you are killing a living human maybe its not born yet but it is still alive.
In the 1800s women were dying using herbs to create a miscarriage . Now today they are surgical procedure being done but not everything is guaranteed . There are many health risk when performing abortions the women might not have another option in getting pregnant she will resent that her whole life . When she wants to create her family in the long run. They can have health complication after they have an abortion they are infection that occur after it's a three day infection that can lead to more complications ,cervical damage.
They believe that human life begins at conception and based on generally contend that abortion is morally wrong because it kills human life. Hippocrates considered termination of pregnancy as unethical. Hippocrates believes whether fetus in womb has rights to live before viability. In any condition the embryo or fetus of any age is protected by Hippocratic code. “I will maintain the utmost respect for human life, from the time of conception.” Most of the opposed of abortion argue based on the following concept: 1- A Fetus has the right to be considered as human being.
Abortion is a murder. It is the intentionally killing of a human being and it is also can be considered as a war on the unborn which are obviously defenseless and voiceless. A. Abortion denies the right of the eternal being to have a mortal experience and also learning experience in this world. “I believe the freedom to choose my course in life but I do not believe I am free to choose the consequences of my
Abortions are usually performed during the first trimester of the pregnancy, not actually killing the fetus, but merely removing it from the woman’s uterus (“The Basics” 1). The fetus, who has been kept alive through the mothers body, is just being cut off of all resources and not in any way being “killed”. If a person is dying and you refuse to donate your kidney to save him or her that does not mean you are killing that person, it merely means you have made the best choice for your future (“The Basics” 1). The same rule applies to a woman’s uterus, she has not killed the fetus, she just refuses to donate her body and organs to an unwanted fetus that will essentially decide her future. A similar analogy has been revised by Philosopher Jane English to illustrate how aborting a fetus is not equivalent to murdering a person.
Abortion is a topic that isn't typically written about because it is so touchy and controversial. Abortion is also knowing as a “termination of pregnancy” since it ends the birthing process of a child and the pregnancy of a mother. Many say abortion is the equivalent to murder and dangerous to a woman's overall state of health. Considered murder of a person, abortions are dangerous to a woman's health and the main stance for religious people is they believe that abortions go against God’s will. On the contrary, it is unfair to put that burden on a woman because her body is her own and is ultimately in charge of how to treat it.
Applying the Kantian moral theory one will see how killing a fetus is not only the killing of an innocent life but it is also treating someone as just a mean instead of an end. Every person in this world was a fetus at one point, growing and learning to survive inside of their mother’s womb. If a study was conducted to question each person in this world, it would be reasonable to believe that each of us living today would now be opposed to being aborted as a fetus. So even if one would believe that having an abortion is morally permissible, it is not possible for them to see a world where everyone would be alright with being aborted as a fetus, thus abortion then fails the Universal Law Formulation (Gensler, 89). With this scenario, it is unfeasible to say to oneself that they would have been okay with being aborted.
The primary argument against abortion is the fact that it is taking the life of an innocent child. People often justify abortion by arguing that the fetus is not alive, thus it cannot be “killed.” Yet in most states, if a pregnant woman is murdered, the killer is charged with a double homicide. Scott Gilbert, in his book Bioethics and the New Embryology: Springboards for Debate, states that “The entity created by fertilization is indeed a human embryo, and it has the potential to be human adult. Whether these facts are enough to accord it personhood is a question influenced by opinion, philosophy, and theology, rather than by science” (43). This is the opinion of many scientists, and the fact that life originates at fertilization is a commonly accepted statement.
His strongest point is simply that killing is not right and it does rob the victim of their future. This was especially true when he discussed the argument of contraception. Marquis took his argument of abortion to a level that was not relatable and too cumbersome. After all, not every sperm and every egg will become a fetus. In addition, if you are robbing an unborn child of its future then how would this matter if the fetus lacks awareness?
Rough Draft As human beings, it is forbidden to kill or murder people. Why should killing an innocent new soul be okay or outright legal? Every legal surgical abortion stops a beating heart and terminates a life. Killing a fetus that has a soul ready to live is morally wrong! Abortion is full of excuses, going against God’s will, and murder.
What makes the act of murder immoral is, not losing the physical aspect of being alive, or the pain caused to our family and friends, but because we are completely eradicating their future, robbing them of their future of value, that they would’ve experienced had they not died, and that is what makes it unjust. “The loss of ones life deprives one of all the experiences, activities, project’s, and enjoyments that would have constituted ones future.” He then applies the same thought process to abortion saying that the reason abortion is wrong is because the fetus will never have a future of value. I believe Marquis’ view on abortion is very different to other philosopher’s views on abortion. Not only because he is pro-life and many philosophers are pro-choice but because he focuses on the potential future of value. He is comparing a human who actually has a future of value, to a fetus, which has not yet begun life.
In one case the baby is definitely alive, adoption, and in the other case it is debatable whether the fetus is alive or not, abortion. Additionally, “very few women who give birth choose to give up their babies - less than 3% of white unmarried women and less than 2% of black unmarried women” (Lowen, Linda). Once an argument uses logical fallacies it immediately makes it less reliable and trustworthy because it is using a technique that does not exemplify
The number one argument would be that abortion is the killing of a live fetus and that is murder (1). This is a good argument and pro life individuals have reasons to back up their belief. An unborn baby has no choice in the matter and they deserve to have a chance at life, no matter what that life looks like (1). They also question how a baby who has been planned is worth more and deserves life moreover one who is not planned or wanted. All people are worth the same and should have the same chance at