Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing

Every year, estimated 26 million animals are used in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. Is animal testing justified? Would our lives be the same without the use of animals in experimentation? It would not be the same. Without animal testing, we would not know if products we use are safe or dangerous to our bodies. Food, household products, drugs and everything else connected to the life of an average human must undergo a form of testing before it is available to the public. They would be based on theory instead of facts. Some people say that everyone benefits from animal research and there is no alternative method, while others say it is cruel and inhumane. Although using animals in scientific experiments may seem brutal, the benefits that the entire human race gets outweigh the cons.

One reason that animal testing should remain legal is that it improves human health and contributes to life-saving cures. For example, the cure for diabetes, a largely

These people also believe that animals should have rights and argue that they are morally equal to humans. Some state that “Animals endure chemicals being dripped into their eyes, injected into their bodies, forced up their nostrils or forced down their throats. They are addicted to drugs, forced to inhale/ingest toxic substances, subjected to maternal deprivation, deafened, blinded, burned, stapled, and infected with disease viruses.” Furthermore, they claim that alternative methods can be better than animal experimentation. The alternatives to animal tests can be efficient and reliable. Successful alternatives include the use of human volunteers, cell and tissue cultures, synthetic membranes, statistics, scanning technologies, and computer models. This is ironic because many believe that other possible methods lead to false conclusions. Even though the overall impression seems inhumane, the outcome of the tests prevail the