A candidate must reach a majority of 270 to win the election. There are many arguments for why the Electoral College is still effective - it strengthens the unity of the country by preventing the domination of an area with a higher population over rural areas. It maintains stability of our political environment by encouraging our bipartisan system, as it makes it very difficult for new parties to win enough popular votes to gain any traction in an election. Most importantly, it maintains a balance between state and federal governments, where the states have the power to select their own
In order for this law to be reinforced, there would have to be some sort of punishment if somebody does not cast their vote (Bargmann).Why should a law abiding citizen be penalized for not wanting to have a say in the way their government is lead? There needs to be a shift in the way elections are held so that voting is more convenient to the average American citizen, and so no one is scrutinized for their choice of not expressing their opinion. Compulsory voting should not be required because it would be violating freedom of choice, which would lead in people casting random votes, and there are superior ways of getting people to vote than forcing them to. Requiring American citizens to vote is a violation of freedom of choice, and the way a person can express their opinion. If they are forced to speak their opinion, they could randomly select a candidate, which would sway the election.
They have this view since it is very cost effective. Unlike many countries that have selective service. In countries with selective service, the government has to fund an advertising campaign to get citizens to willing join the military. Whether that is incorporating incentives, such as the military helping pay for college. However, there is more to this rather than how just the government can benefit financially.
Our nation 's first amendment grants citizens the freedom to speak and spread their ideas. For example, one cannot be thrown in a cell for sharing negative ideas about the government and/or its leader(s). In many cases, putting such notions out into the world can be a very positive action. Once injustice from within a governing system is revealed, it is much easier to gather like-minded people in
Nothing is unfair or biased in the court system. Tranquility means that the United States will do their best to keep the nation peaceful. In times of peace, the United States can focus their time and money on things other than war. It also raises the general morale of the nation. When the nation is not at war, citizens feel more safe.
Also, the electoral college forces the candidates to focus on several topics and regions. In December 16, 2016 the article The Electoral College is an Excellent System by George F Will, he explains that “the electoral college shapes the character of majorities by helping generate those that are neither geographically nor ideologically narrow…” (doc B). The competitors will not be able to become the president if the limit themselves to one topic and area. They must support several topics and try to appeal to all the states they can if they want to be the president through the system of electoral college. This is important because the president will try to fit everyone 's needs and not just a certain group of people’s needs and wants.
They vote on any politics issues from the smallest to the biggest in harmony. Obviously, direct democracy is more democratic; the majority can have the best. This inspired us an idea of direct democracy could work well today in the United States as well; nonetheless, it is too idealistic. This essay will clarify why government is important to our life, the strength and weakness of direct democracy compare to representative democracy, and why direct democracy is unfeasible for America. Undoubtedly, government is one of the most important components of people’s life.
Democracy is a foundation of a country’s success. The idea of mandatory voting goes against the democracy of the United States. Mandatory voting is a violation to our civil rights and will become a law in the United States. Although many people believe that mandatory voting helps to strengthen a democratic government by making more voters participate in political process.However, mandatory voting violates the democratic United States by restricting people’s rights. Many believe that mandatory voting should become a law in America.
The representatives elected by the people to conduct the affairs of the state with the support of the people. If they do not work well or do not meet the expectations of the people, the representatives may not have again in the next election. In this way, people do not need to revolt when wants change. That means the wishes of the public is the supporter of the parliamentary government and not based on fear of the authorities. Democracy stands on consensus and not on power; the citizens have the opportunity to take part actively in the
Rawls gave as an answer to the experiment anyway. He thought every sane person would choose a society with some basic social covered aspects, such as good education, great healthcare, a fair access to justice and a good housing for everyone. This raises another dilemma. People usually know which kind of society they want or they find fair, they just do not know how to achieve it or they just do not question about it because the choices were already made for them. But the main conclusion of the Veil of Ignorance is that if we had to play a lottery, we would create the fairest and most just society we could achieve.
He argues that a large republic would be using the idea of majority rules, but the ideas of the minority would still be taken into consideration. This also means that no one group could take over the government. He also argues that if it was a small democracy it would be easy for the candidates to fool the voters. If it was a large republic then it would be harder to fool voters. Madison believes that large republics are best able to avoid the dangers of faction.
While having electors in each state, it makes the voting process easier for the government. Most of the time, unless the vote counts are very close, there will not need to be a recount. Using electors to vote for the popular choice of the state, keeps it simple and easy with fewer people to account for. In an article that agrees with the College, they express, “The Electoral College guarantees certainty to the outcome of the presidential election” (The Electoral College: Top 3 Pros and Cons). This is very important to understand because there is no debate over electoral votes.
Two, the reliability of the Electoral College it only ever questioned around an election. Three, if the popular vote was the system of voting for the US, people would switch their loyalty to their state making it a “win all” election. The electoral college is a reliable and efficient system because it can show changing opinion towards
A voting U.S. citizen does not directly elect the President and Vice President; instead, these voters directly elect designated intermediaries called "electors," who almost always have pledged to vote for particular presidential and vice presidential candidates. Many Americans believe that their vote directly affects who leads the election but that is simply not true. They are voting for their state Electoral College to vote for that candidate. The Electoral College was made way back when, so it has its pros and cons. Is this the right way to vote for the president of the United States.