Should extinct species be brought back to earth? In my opinion I think that de-extinction is a bad idea. Take the wooly mammoth for example, if scientists were to bring it back they could be taking resources away from other species causing them to disappear, humans might try to harm other animals that aren’t extinct, and scientists would have to successfully re-introduce this animal back into the lifestyle they used to have. Although some people believe that de-extinction is a good thing, I strongly disagree because of those three reasons. One reason that de-extinction is a horrible idea is that the species, lets say a wooly mammoth, could potentially take important resources away from other species causing them to disappear.
This process is very unethical. This can lead to genetic defects, it limits genetic diversity, and it can be taken to very extreme levels. ` To start us off, genetically engineering a baby can be very unsafe for it and lead to genetic defects. Scientists don’t know everything about the human body yet, and because of this, if we end up modifying something, it could end up affecting something important that we didn’t know about. We also can’t predict the outcome of the modification yet.
Once they discover how the animals are being threatened they will try to prevent them from becoming endangered (Endangered Species: Facts). The next level right before extinction is endangered animals, and it is very different than threatened animals. Endangered animals is when an animal species starts to get less populated, and their conditions of living become very hard means they are becoming endangered animals (Endangered Species: Facts). Once an animal reaches endangerment, then people need to take caution when they are near any of those animals (Endangered Species: Facts). When an animal becomes endangered, than people have no idea how long these animals have till they will be lost forever (Endangered Species: Facts).
Animal testing is a thing of the past, it is clearly a rough field of work. At the end of the day we are above animals in the food chain, but torturing them for our advancement is not the answer. There are many ways to reduce animal cruelty and stop it for good. Be apart of that
One reason the current death penalty needs to be reformed is it costly system.. Handing down the punishment of the death penalty is a loaded sentence. There are many steps and requirements that must be met in order to execute the accused criminal. These steps and requirements become a very costly endeavor, consuming not only taxpayers dollars, but also a vast number of resources. During death penalty cases, there are multiple trials and retirals that are conducted in order to ensure no errors of judgment. These many trials require a great deal of funds and resources.
2. What are the constraints? There are budget and time constraints. The discovery and development of drugs risky process that can consume a lot of time and money. The longer it takes to get develop a new drug, the more money it will cost and if the drug ends up harming participants that test new drugs, that will be a lot of money down the drain.
Negative impacts of transgenic animals and crops. (9 Biggest Pros and Cons of Transgenic Animals., 2015) & (G., 2015) 1. The use of transgenic animals is unethical: - People that oppose the idea of modifying genes for animals to create offspring that will help the society in some way say that doing this is a major part when going against moral ethics. Additionally, animal advocates are particularly the main people that are not in support for this habit. These people strongly believe that animals also carry rights like humans and it’s against the rights to change their DNA and genetically modify it for human use.
It is incredibly expensive and inefficient. Physicians don’t like it much. At a time of increasing economic pressures, companies are putting heightened scrutiny on the economics of their selling processes. Investigating new concepts, they find an abundance of new technologies and options. Being blinded by the latest technological bells and whistles and jumping on the next bandwagon would be an easy, but potentially costly, mistake
Although some species have adapted to habitat changes, many other species are yet unable to adjust to the new conditions, which happens to be a major issue wildlife is facing in today’s world. The effects such actions have on flora and fauna species cannot be overlooked, some of which will be discussed in this essay. Firstly, the massive destruction of wildlife, or to be more specific, the destruction of natural habitats is due to a number of reasons some of which are deforestation, pollution, and natural calamities. Deforestation has innumerable destructive outcomes on the environment; therefore, a great population of plants and animals residing in the forests fail to survive as a consequence of habitat loss. Increasing demands for land for urban, agricultural, and industrial use in turn promotes deforestation.
Unless governments make a move will further exacerbate the biological system look. It will begin to biodegrade and it inevitably beyond words they don't make a move. The high gathering of people in shoreline ranges has made various cash points of interest, including transportation joins, mechanical and urban headway, and wage from tourism. Be that as it may, the huge effects of populace development monetary and mechanical are undermining biological communities that live in the territory. Unless governments make a move will further exacerbate the biological community look.