If a picture is worth a thousand words, then a quick Google image for images of “animal research” must be worth several hundred thousand. There is no denying the horrific and deeply disturbing nature of animal experimentation, no matter the purpose or supposed benefit to humans. Viewing these images generates a very visceral and negative reaction. It is this kind of visceral reaction that makes animal rights such a divisive issue. Images of sentient animals, like primates, rabbits, mice, and birds, has driven opponents to acts of terrorism in the defense of animal rights (Pilkington, 2015).
Animal research can be traced back to the third century BCE, when animals were used by Egyptians to study bodily functions (MacKinnon, 2015). Aristotle
…show more content…
Consequently, a utilitarian will view the plight of the test animals as acceptable if the net outcome is positive for all involved. For the utilitarian, however, the testing of cosmetics would be viewed as immoral, as cosmetic products are not essential to saving or improving human life. The higher the moral value assigned to the animal species, the less morally acceptable cosmetics testing becomes. Some might argue cosmetics testing on animals helps to produce products that promote human happiness, however, we are allowing non-human animals some level of rights, and therefore we should weigh the cost to the animals involved. Additionally, opponents to the cosmetics testing point to new technologies, like in vitro tissue testing, as an alternative to using animals (Gelfand, 2015). The growth and harvesting of human skin also promises to further reduce the reliance on animal testing (Campbell, 2015). Despite these new options, cosmetics testing on animals continues with no foreseeable end in sight, and subsequently, many consumers chose not to purchase products tested on animals (Chitrakorn, …show more content…
The ethical altruist is the consummate animal rights activist. Not only would an altruist agree that non-human animals were sentient and thus deserving of moral rights, the altruist would see all animals as sentient beings deserving of equal rights as humans. Altruist thinking dictates helping others, even if that means sacrificing their own goals, security, and happiness. In modern western culture, many official animal rights organizations have adopted altruistic moral positions on animal research as well as many other animal rights issues. Many animal rights activists regularly protest the use of animals in all kinds of research. Some more extreme altruistic risk punishment under the law for various activities such as stealing animals from research facilities, releasing animals from farms, and even acts of terrorism (Pilkington,
While viewing animal experiments can be conducted both through the prism of the benefits and the disadvantages, this issue served as a powerful reason for discussions in the society and points out the need for
Protection Animal testing is cruel and inhumane, it should not be acceptable to use animals in scientific research. Vivisection is another term for an animal experimentation including; dissection, administering drugs, brain damaging, and other painful and invasive experiences to animals. According to Humane Society International, animals used in experiments are subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation("Testing - American Anti-Vivisection Society.") Animals are very different from human-being therefore it can make a poor scientific results. They should not have to suffocate and die to be use in research and cosmetics testing because there are alternative choices and different techniques that could lead to the
Purpose: To inform the audience about animal testing I. Introduction A. Attention getting device: Approximately 26 million animals are used every year in US laboratories for cosmetic and biomedical research. B. Thesis: I would like to inform you about how animal testing is conducted. C. Credibility: I have read and studied the articles about animal testing. D. Preview: I am going to share with you purposes of animal testing, how animals are used in laboratory tests, and the effectiveness of animal testing.
Cosmetic testing on animals is unnecessary when it comes to consumer wants. Defenseless animals should not have to suffer through useless experimentations of cosmetics. Millions of animals have painful deaths every year, because people are allowing this to happen. Since these experiments are an ancient way of testing, the animals’ deaths are in vain. They’re not the most accurate results, and there are other ways to avoid this without the cost of beauty.
"If it 's proven to reduce suffering through animals tests, it 's not wrong to use them. To say cosmetics is an absolute evil is absurd. " The Canadian Federal of Human Societies states that all cosmetic companies in Canada are required to confirm the safety of their products. Scientific research shows that animals and humans are very similar in terms of DNA and genetics. Although animal experimentation is not required and the research conducted is often unreliable, this proves why animals are the perfect testing subjects.
Some researchers and physicians support the idea of alternative testing methods, but few occurrences call for the use of animal testing. yet we would not have many of our breakthroughs without the use of animal testing. The history of animal testing can be traced back to the early Greeks, such as physician – scientist Aristotle. The earliest dated animal testing can be traced back to Rome to an early Greek physician named Galen.
Animals are obviously different than humans, and many drugs/cosmetics react to animals and humans react differently. Because animals and humans are so different tests are not accurate and then humans are affected in turn. “The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has noted
Imagery helped illustrate animal testing by visually describing a makeup store , “The myriad of colours, the sparkle of textures and tones, the rainbows of different hues, the burning, bright lights and shining mirrors, the delicious scents of freshly sprayed samples of perfume”. I chose these arguments because they are the most powerful. Upon researching and reading many articles, the strongest and most confronting points were selected to produce the most effective speech on animal testing. By including a variety of types of evidence, such as statistics, facts, research, and quotes I can appeal to a wider range of audience members. This evidence reiterates the fact that animals have no say in what happens to them.
I’m here today to talk about a controversial issue that has been around for a period of time, animal testing. Animal testing using animals in experiments with different chemical substances in everything from medical to cosmetic to determine their safety as well as effectiveness . It’s a problem that has existed since the 3rd and 4th centuries BCE with its merciless methods and painful ways of abusing animals for human demands, but now it’s time for it to stop. Our technology has developed significantly since; therefore, such medieval methods of torturing animals are no longer necessary. Researches have shown that each year, over 100 million animals are tortured and killed in American laboratories alone, including dogs, cats and more; this shows how far out of hand animal testing have gotten.
Why Animal Testing is Wrong The human race has greatly benefitted through the use of animals. They have not only been a great form of companionship for people, but have also helped with the success in the world of medicine. For many years, the rights of animals and animal experimentation have been up for debate on whether or not it should be legal. Some may find that animal testing has led to major advancements in the medical world and that it is a small price to pay to save millions of lives, but others believe it is inhumane and that animals should be given the same rights as humans.
When hearing animals are in misery, being burned and killed is the most heart breaking thing to hear, this is all because of animal testing on everyday cosmetic products humans use. Ladies and Gentlemen, if you didn’t know there is many tests that
Moreover, testing for cosmetics is obviously evil to animals. The fact that people take small helpless animals to torture them, so human could feel better. In the article “Animal Testing-A Necessary Evil?” Paterson reports that “Animals are also not just exposed to short periods of physical restraint but also prolonged periods. They can be deprived of food and water and wounds are inflicted, along with burns and other injuries in order to study healing.
Leaping Toward a Cruelty-Free World Worldwide, cosmetic animal testing is still implemented. Although some parts of the world have banned testing chemicals on animals such as the European Union and New Zealand, countries such as the United States and Canada continue to consent. “The beauty industry makes people look and feel beautiful but is horrifically ugly when it comes to the treatment of animals in laboratories.” (Cole 2). Knowing the alternatives, organizations, and cruelty-free products ultimately improves the knowledge about animal testing.
: Beliefs about animal pain and feelings. 1. Topic Sentence – The pain and/or feelings the animals can experience are a very unknown aspect when it comes to testing. Animals do feel pain, of course, but to what extent? 2.
Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.