Animal testing is defined as “the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances such as foods or drugs” (Dictionary.com). This experimentation has been practiced since around 500 BCE, and has allowed the human race to discover many things that otherwise would have not been discovered (ProCon). The use of animal testing has increased, due to its many necessary benefits, such as: helping form vaccinations and uncovering new diseases in the specific species being tested on (AALAS). However, many animal activist groups such as, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), have spoken out against the issue. These groups claim animal testing to be “inhumane”
Animals are specifically adapted to their environment and, when scientists manipulates the genes of a few species in the ecosystem, the entire balance of the ecosystem might fall apart, causing an unknown number of natural animal species to go extinct. A moral issue that comes into a picture is that animals should have the right to be free of genetic manipulation. Despite this, the law in both the United States and in Europe (where most of this research takes place) tends to support genetic engineering
They even required terminal surgeries. However, with the commotion caused by their actions they made the entire veterinary education more ethical as a whole. 2) Now, around 90% of schools offer human anatomy computer programs as an alternative choice. Around 90% of schools now offer “willed body” programs. These are programs that acquire their animal cadavers from ethical sources, such as a natural death.
Many human diseases exist in other species also. Cancer, heart failure, asthma, rabies, etc. are natural diseases in many different animals and testing began with animals with cures, preventions, and treatments now available for animals and humans. The polio vaccine used in humans is still used in wild chimps today and was originally tested on primates before it was introduced to humans. The elimination of smallpox is possible because it was originally tested on animal.
glish Speech In the year 2000, over 2 million animals were used for animal testing in the UK. Animals used from all over for animal testing that ranges from drugs to our simple everyday shampoo. In the last decade, cosmetic animal testing on innocent animals has become popular practice – and I am talking about how wrong and inhuman this act is. The public doesn 't know about the seriousness controversial topic, which I am certain of knowing is wrong. We shouldn’t silent such a topic, because of fears of upsetting people who affected – yet they should know what they are applying to their face is being used to torture innocent animals.
We are so lucky to have animals in the world. I mean, what better living creatures to use than rodents, rabbits, guinea pigs and hamsters for experimentation. Several popular beauty and cosmetic brands including Maybelline, Avon, Rimmel London, Covergirl and even Dove, test their products or ingredients on animals. Regardless of this having effects on their sales, companies perform this act for our safety and so that our mascaras don’t make our eyelashes fall out or our shampoos won’t make us bald. Most importantly, it’s done for proof when injured customers sue.
Animals have existed by human’s side for millions of years, however, recently, certain animals are being used to test human products. Products that are not significant compared to the pain animals such as guinea pigs, dogs, rats; and rabbit are forced to endure. Would testing that one lipstick formula or mascara be worth the agony of a living soul? For some, the answer would be yes, our own selfish needs outweigh their effects on others. Perhaps some people would even be the ones testing on these animals as long as they get paid.
For many years animals have been experimented on for the hope of finding cures for many illnesses that plague society. There has been a significant amount of research that shows that many diseases have been cured because of experimenting on animals ( Source B). Out of the population, 17 17 million people are diagnosed with diabetes that is 6.2% of all American ( Source A). "Dogs were crucial to the research that identified the cause of diabetes, which led to the development of insulin" (Source A). Dogs have also contributed to the research and development of open heart surgery.
There were 3.7 million scientific procedures performed on animals according to the UK home office. Nobody wants animals to be treated cruelly but you would not like your love ones to have the best chance of survival it forced with deadly disease. Even though there are animal testing alternatives it is often necessary to treatment with a living body. Every major medical achievement has relied on animal testing. Scientist try to limit the harm caused in animals.
Animal testing is a highly controversial subject, disputed among many. It is evidently not pleasant to animals, but it is extremely beneficial for scientific findings. Some say it is a necessary evil, and some say it is animal cruelty. Others cannot simply make up their minds about this subject. Although many people are against animal testing, it must continue due to medicine development, advantages of testing animals over other subjects, and the regulated experiments for the animals’ safety.
Many Americans have pets in their homes, who they consider to be important part of their lives. As a result many people are concerned with animals rights. Many people believe that animals should be treated the same as humans, however the struggle to find cures for some of America 's most common diseases, animal testing is a key to find these cures. Animal testing should be continued as long as it is done humanely, so we can find cures and new medicines. The first reson animal testing should be continued is so we can make new cures shore new medicines are safe.
Although the idea of testing with animals may sound horrible, animal testing is extremely necessary to keep developing new medicines, and treatments. The benefits of animal testing outweigh the cons of hurting animals for our own wellbeing. These benefits include, many long found treatments and cures that has helped many people throughout the years. Animal testing is also the only way that scientists can properly test on. And lastly, whether many people believe it or not it also benefits animals as well.
It reminds me of the people living and suffering an illness and how they need medical help. Do we value the life of one mouse more than we value hundreds of thousands of human lives. In conclusion, animal research is vital to human survival. Although some animal lives may be lost the process I believe that it is worth the risk if it will save someone 's life. In Charlie 's case Algernon was able to show him what will happen to Charlie and even though he was not able to do anything about it, he was able to prepare.
After Sun reassures readers that the animals are completely safe and pain-free, she is able to reinforce how animal testing is beneficial through sound research. “The truth behind animal testing,” explains how specific discoveries such as insulin, blood transfusions, penicillin, so on and so forth have been unearthed because of animal testing. Today, many people can relate to these medical advances because they are so commonly used in hospitals and the medical field. Sun’s research even introduces multiple cases where animal testing was successful. One such case included Charles Chamberland who was able to find a vaccine for both cholera and anthrax through animal experimentation with little harm to the chickens he was testing.
It helps clue us in on how DNA replication works, ameliorating the world’s understanding on how animals reproduce and function. Moreover, cloning as a whole can even help the world from a preservation perspective. Through cloning, scientists can help save endangered species by creating genetic replicas that can contribute to multiplying the species, driving it away from extinction. Countering all those cloning positives, however, is the endless list of arguments against cloning. It goes against Darwin’s “survival of the fittest” theory, making it an unnatural process.