Cuban artist Erik Ravelo took a series of photographs of children hanging like Jesus Christ from cross that were actually the back of the bodies of priests, soldiers, surgeons, terrorists, and even Ronald McDonald. The photos were meant to be a reference to all the mischiefs of our contemporary world that are harming children. In fact, the living crosses are a reference to pedophilia in the Vatican, child sex tourism in Thailand, the conflict in Syria, the trafficking of children’s organs in Third World countries and the obesity of the Western world induced by fast-food companies. Nevertheless, the images soon took on a controversy, as they were accused to re-perpetrate the crimes that they were trying to shed a light on – in particular, child …show more content…
In fact, he is most famous for the United Colors of Benetton’s “UnHate” campaign. In the campaign, Ravelo photo shopped political and religious leaders making out. This explains why it is not really a surprise that “The Untouchables” also comes with its problems and controversies. Understanding that the photos came from the perspective of an artist, we should take into consideration that the images cannot be simply considered means of communicating a problem and, thus, shed light on an issue. As a matter of fact, Ravelo made money off of the pictures, and this also needs to be taken into account. While the “UnHate” campaign was explicitly a marketing strategy, “The Untouchables” might be Ravelo’s personal marketing strategy in order to sell his artwork. Clearly, his intended buyers/audience are all those who use Facebook and, subsequently, adults who found tha photographs either controversial or a step toward public awareness. As a matter of fact, it is public awareness that Ravelo seems to be proponing, by using the images to make people knowledgeable on all of those actions that take place around the world constantly and that take away children’s …show more content…
The composition and the framing of the pictures are all exactly the same – what changes is the idea that they represent. The first image, for example, portrays an adult dressed in the robe of a Catholic cardinal, while an almost totally naked child hangs on his back. In the second image, a man dressed in what appear to be very colorful tourist’s clothes, whit a camera hanging from his wrists, stands as a cross to a girl with long straight hair and a purple skirt. The third image shows a young girl fully covered in black clothes as she hangs on the back of a soldier. In this third image, a weapon is also placed on the wall on the left of the soldier’s body. An almost naked, very skinny child is then photographed in the fourth picture as hanging on the back of a surgeon. The doctor is holding some tools in his hands and a portable refrigerator is depicted to his left. In the fifth picture, a blonde girl dressed in a school uniform hangs on the back of a man holding two guns and wearing a red hoodie. On his left side, another big weapon is placed. In the sixth photograph, McDonald’s body serves as a cross for a chubby boy. The image, then, presents a bald, half-naked boy crucified on the back of a man wearing an orange nuclear
Each image is paralleled to the other on the bottom of the first and third panel. In the first panel, the presents the image of Richard Nixon dancing with his daughter in a ballroom on her wedding day. Nixon, a president with reputation for scandal and corruption, and displays his image in parallel to the third panel, containing a photo of a red war ship named after Condoleezza Rice, the former Secretary of State in the Bush administration who would’ve been ending her time in office at the time of this piece’s creation. By shrouding Nixon and Rice’s ship both in the black ink, Harris is associating both figures with the same amount of corruptness, perhaps for Rice not with the ship itself but with the War created during her term as Secretary of State with the inclusion of a sniper rifle with the repeated images of the inverted dove and Uncle
In this image we can see demonstrators holding a banner that says; “ We will not be intimidated!” During the 1960s and 1970 many Chicanos will protest peacefully, but many of these of protest were intervened by police brutality, and this is where “We will Not Be Intimidated” No matter what obstacles you throw at us, we will not stop. Photography can be a powerful weapon to empower activist and also be used as a tool to communicate concerns and issues visually. La Raza empowered many activists a decade ago, the displaying of this archive can also empower many young activists in modern day. This is where the importance of recovering history comes from.
In many instances, Pilar’s voice serves to question the clarity of the lens with which we see the world. Beginning as a child, Pilar seeks to discover a truth that goes beyond the superficial. She broaches the subject of image in the context of advertisements, saying, “I read somewhere that the woman who posed for it was three months pregnant at the time and that it was shaving cream, not whipped cream, she was suggestively dipping into her mouth” (197). Through the irony of this event, Garcia brings to light the fiction of image, and the way the realities we accept at face value, are often only shadows of what truly exists. The fiction of image, and of memory is something that Celia ponders as well.
In Photo 2, the hands are arranged so one seems as if it is holding up another, displaying the comforting side to grace. As well as the hand position, the blue ambiance of the picture plays into how Grace is comforting and
“Passport Photos” by Amitava Kumar is an excerpt combining poetry and photography, and making it into a cultural analysis over immigrant conditions. The author explains complicated situations that immigrants have had to deal with when they step towards the U.S. and one of the main conflicts will be language. This piece has described historical moments, such as mentioning “Alfred Arteaga” and the irony of deportation and printing, cultural critiques, and the reality when it comes to the Hispanic cultures. Kumar reflects his book based on a significant image saying “Caution” in English and “Prohibido” in Spanish. In other words, the sign is telling citizens, “Caution”: be careful by avoiding danger, but then it is telling immigrant’s “Prohibido”,
The crossing between fashion and media can have a powerful impact on the perception of subcultures and marginalized communities, as seen in the case of pachucos and their signature fashion statement with the zoot suit. In the book “Zoot Suit and Other Plays” by Luis Valdez, he explores the experiences and struggles of Mexican Americans and Chicano culture. With one of his plays surrounding the 1942 Sleepy Lagoon Murder case, we find out that the zoot suit was a way to express their cultural identity, also how the media created negative stereotypes about the Mexican American/Latin youth culture. But, it’s also vital to consider the extent to which measures such as “other reasons why they wear the zoot suit” or “what certain stereotypes the media
The Bad Kids uses an assortment of techniques to create a way to get the viewer emotional involved in the story. The techniques involved in the film are shots of the weather, the way voice overs are used, and the overall structure of each child’s conflict. The director’s purpose in using these techniques is to get the viewer to see that these kids, who have had a hard life, are largely victims of the circumstances that they were born into. These kids are just a few in a country and world where millions of kids are written off as “bad kids” that have nothing to offer to the world. The director shows that they have a story behind that label and that their stories continue even have people have written them off.
It embodies its beauty and its ugly, its replenishing deep and glowing symbols (Tibol, 75) His works describe the evolution of stages and use of different spirits. His purpose for creating this piece was to transform muralism in Mexico and changed the portrayal of authoritative figures. Overall, it was a socialist political message. His artistic style is important because many of the murals depict a Mexican landscape loaded with “political, cultural and historical imagery designed to hold the Mexican people into a new era of national pride.”
During this chapter we learn about fourteen year old Fernando’s real passion. Although he works in his step fathers barber shop, that is not what he really wants to do. His real passion is taking photos of the graffiti art found in the tunnels of the New York subways. He loves the underground tags most because it is more brave to do it in the tunnels than the wall above
In the altar’s center is “a plaster image of the Virgin of Guadalupe, quarter-life size, its brown Indian face staring down on the woman” (Paredes 23). The implication of the stare is of criticism as the Virgin, symbolic of an ideal Mexican womanhood, looks down on Marcela, whose Anglo features starkly contrast with the Virgin’s, and whose actions are in opposition to the values that she represents. This carefully constructed scene is meaningful. Marcela’s lifeless body lies between the bed and the altar, and opposite to the altar is Marcela’s shrine dedicated to Hollywood movie stars. These are the visual images of the opposing forces that characterize the Mexican-American struggle for resistance against American cultural hegemony.
Whether through art or language, representations of identity ensue from processes that communicate what manners of being are considered culturally valid within a society. The expression of these expected conditions of existence depends on normative forms of social conditioning, and it is from within this fixed set of self-reproducing actions that hegemonic apparatuses possess power over people. Owing to an ideological foundation situated among various terms pioneered by Gloria Anzaldúa in her piece titled Borderlands/La Frontera, José Esteban Muñoz develops an ability to comprehend how the performance of intersubjective queerness disturbs essences of normativity, and comforts those who disidentify with mainstream perception. The following concepts
The physical image of poverty portrayed by the family reflects The Great Depression’s toll on their livelihood. It is clearly and plainly displayed that the mother and her children are impoverished by the techniques of black and white color choice, and intricate, detailed texture. The hardship faced by the family is highlighted by the photograph being in black and white. This allows for the simplicity of their condition to be shown without the distractions a photograph in color would provide. The image is very detailed and defined by texture, to leave no question to whether the family lacks wealth or riches.
Picture being so scared walking home alone that you had to carry a switchblade around. In The Outsiders Ponyboy, and his friends who are called the greasers, live in a violent, bad neighborhood without their parents. They are against a group called Socs who are a higher class, in a much better neighborhood and they jump the greasers all the time out of nowhere. The setting causes the characters to be tense and anxious, for example, Johnny and Darry who can never calm down and loosen up. They always have to look behind their back everywhere they go.
Gone with the Wind Analysis While watching the film Gone with the Wind most people would pay little to no attention to details like camera angle or lighting. However, Gone with the Wind is a great example of mise-en-scene ,what is physically being shot in the scene without editing and can include, but is not limited to camera movement, lighting, focus and scenery, in many different ways. Mise-en-scene actually appears during the first scene when Scarlett is sitting on the steps of Tara, her family’s plantation, along with her two of her male companions. Scarlett is sitting on the top stair while the twins are sitting on stairs below hers almost as if they were worshipping her. Scarlett is also looking down upon the twins as if she were superior to them.
Adversity in “The Intouchables” “My true disability is not having to be in a wheel chair. It’s having to be without her.” (The Intouchables). Lines like that are just a piece of the great undertaking directors Olivier Nakache and Eric Toledano took when they decided to be part of The Intouchables.