Should the Death Penalty be outlawed through the United States? Since the beginning of executions, people have had a negative or positive view on the death penalty. Capital Punishment has created a huge debate between whether the government should make the death penalty illegal or legal.The cause of this has made 19 States to make the death penalty illegal. People who are for say and “eye for an eye” should be taken more seriously but the people who are against say no one deserves to die. If you are for or against the death penalty, the question is Do you believe a human being should be killed for one’s actions?
In the U.S.A alone since 1973 130 innocent people have been sentenced to death(1) and in the last two years evidence has come up that indicates four men previously thought to be guilty may have actually been innocent and put to death(3). The death penalty is supposed to protect innocent people from killers, instead it murders them. And these are the people who have been discovered to be innocent! What about the ones who were not so lucky? A recent example of this is Richard Glossip a man who was sentenced to death based on a corrupt statement with no other evidence to prove him guilty (5).
Even though the death penalty may seem like a way to help victims and make criminals suffer, it is not effective. It does more harm than good. One reason is that the death penalty is not allowing the offender to suffer. If the inmate lacks remorse and doesn 't care if he or she dies or not, how is killing them is teaching them that killing is wrong. In some cases, living a life with no freedom and isolation are worse than living at all.
“On the other hand, a person who commits a murder or a rape knows that they are risking their freedom, which can serve as a powerful deterrent” (Apecsecadmin). In the same way, the death penalty can also serve as an extremely powerful deterrent. If other criminals see that this is happening, and they are heading in the direction of committing the same crimes, it might make them rethink what they are doing if they know there is a potential risk of receiving the death penalty. Canada abolished the death penalty 1976. Twenty seven years after the abolishment, Canada saw a 44 per cent drop in murders across the country (“5
The death penalty has been a part of the judicial system for many years. It is the legal process where the state court system orders execution of a person for a crime he or she committed. A death penalty crime is a horribly brutal and violent crime most people cannot even imagine. These crimes consist of acts like serial killing, mass murder, and other crimes of violent killing. However, Espionage and treason neither are brutal or violent and are considered a death penalty offense.
It is shown that the countries that use this system of penalty is supported by most part of the society, and when someone tries to revoke this punishment that person do not receive the popular support. Supporters of the death penalty agree that it is an easy and effective way to deal with the crime, and it is true, also they support other factors as for example the economic, why this one? Because to take care and sustain a criminal in a prison generates a lot of spends for the society and government. So it seems to be positive, and maybe it is, because there are notable benefits, we can take for example Singapour, a promising metropolis with excellent economic levels and natality. A lot of people said that is thanks to the application of the death
The people opposing the death penalty usually believe that it shouldn’t be used because all life is precious. There are still 31 states that use the death penalty as of August 2017(Death Penalty). With this in mind, should the US government stop using the death penalty as a form of punishment? The People that oppose the death penalty believe that it shouldn’t be used because there’s better alternatives to deal with the criminals. “(...)in the United States in 1976, 138 innocent men and women have been released from death row, including
In this essay, I will write why death penalty should end by writing about the violation of human rights, execution of innocent people, the fact that it does not deter crime and money. First, I will write about the violation of the human rights. Death penalty is a violation on the most basic human right. It violates that every human being has the right to freedom and life, article 3 in the united nation declaration of the human rights. Humanity
Our amendment rights should not be neglected as it will just represent the wrong message to society. In addition, the death penalty also wastes a larger amount of taxpayers’ money compared to normal criminal punishments. Lastly, no research has proven that death penalty will lower the number of capital crimes, but has proven that innocent people may have been sentenced with the death penalty. Death penalties do not serve justice, but only serve as a disguise to mask cruelty. Reflecting on this research, I know that death penalty goes against righteousness in several ways, including the reasons stated