Persuasive Essay On Euthanasia

“When physicians take the Hippocratic Oath, they swear to not play at God in their practice of medicine” (Lariat). Allowing patients to die with decency, like they wish, would go against the Hippocratic Oath and it would also change the doctor’s role as a caretaker. Even so, dying with dignity still has many

At this very moment, active euthanasia is not legal. As far as legalizing active euthanasia goes, Foot thinks that we need to tread lightly. She doesn 't exactly agree with this idea. She believes that euthanasia will be abused immediately. There are people who want to unburden themselves of the elderly & will simply euthanize them for their own benefit, not the elders.

Most of these statements come from religious persons or the physicians themselves. They claim that not only is it morally unjust but it is considered murder, “Today, nearly all states prohibit assisted suicide and euthanasia. In Illinois, Michigan, and Ohio, assisting suicide is considered murder.” (Raed Gonzalez, J.D., LL.M candidate) For religious people assisted suicide goes against the laws of God. Religious people say that it goes against the fifth commandment which is “Thou shalt not kill.” (Bible) The commandment prohibits the murder of oneself or the murder of others. This is considered a divine law which shouldn’t be changed for the good of a few people, much like how a state law can’t contradict a federal law.

A couple of guidelines for Jehovah Witnesses are no sex before marriage, no wagering, beside no drinking, no untimely birth, and no war. Sex before marriage is an imperative sin in all religions, yet Jehovah Witnesses view it as something that should not be thought of before marriage in any shape . Wagering is a sort of voracity, and should not be done. A touch of drinking is thought about the Jehovah Witnesses yet if they end up alcoholic, it is seen as a bad behavior. Jehovah Witnesses blame people that rashly end their children .

Tutton can be also be applied in this scenario. The case involves a child named Christopher who needed insulin injection to stay in proper health, however, the mother refused to give the insulin believing God will be able to heal him, resulting in the death of Christopher. The accused argued that she is religious and had a vision of God that told her that Christopher was cured. The courts argues that under the law, she had the duty to provide Christopher with the injections unless she had an lawful excuse such as can not properly afford the drug, since she did not have any lawful excuse, she was charged with manslaughter by showing reckless disregard for Christopher’s life due to knowing the fact that the doctors told Tuttons that Christopher needed the insulin in order to maintain healthy . This case is very similar to the case provided.

The entire society is scared to ruffle someone’s feathers, which resulted in the ban. When religion comes into play, some people will get offended if people don’t believe in God or vice versa. Religion was clearly offensive to man, so that was banned. The reason for the government not wanting to offend people is that if no one gets offended: no one complains about the government or threatens to challenge them. In Fahrenheit 451, great literature, religion, and philosophy are abolished for a plethora of reasons.

Most people would never contemplate whether or not to end their family pet’s suffering, so why can’t people be as sympathetic to their family and friends? In today’s society, the legalization of physician-assisted suicide is one of the most debatable topics. The debates on physician-assisted suicide go back and forth between whether or not patients, specifically terminally ill patients, should have the right to die with the aid of doctors. Opponents believe physician-assisted suicide is morally and ethically wrong for patients to end their lives, and they believe it violates basic medical standards. However, proponents of physician-assisted suicide believe it is a humane and safe way for terminally ill patients to resolve their agony.

A man is unable to experience pregnancy, which is a reason I believe they should have no say in the matter of abortion. Not only is it important for women to dictate their own bodies, but it is important to ensure comfort when women are dealing with abortions. Unfortunately, millions of women die each year due to illegal abortions. When women feel trapped, they are forced to find their own solutions which some, have proved to be deathly. Warren’s theory opens abortion as a subject that is meant to help and not harm.

People that support abortion often cite the fact that abortion is permissible because a fetus has no rational capacities like children and adults do. This same way of thinking means that a fetus has no choice or ability to make decision when it comes to whose womb they inhabit as a result of failed contraception. Again, I am not arguing that abortion would not be morally permissible in the case of failed contraception but I am saying that there are key differences in intent and rational capacities between a malicious burglar and an unknowing fetus that weaken this analogy. Thomson also says that a burglar who breaks in should not have a right to stay in your house. While this is true, there are very few cases where a burglar will stay in your house if there intent is to steal something and get away.

The court begs John’s wife, “Will you plea his confession?” (202). The only way to prevent uprising in the village was to get John Proctor to confess to witchcraft so he would not be forced to hang. Although the court knows all of this is fraud, they must continue hanging innocent people because of the twelve that were already killed. On the other hand, some may argue that the townspeople could have just confessed, and nobody would’ve had to die. This argument is proven invalid considering the Puritan church damned all liars.