The Necessity of Fracking: A Discussion of its Benefits
Fracking is a very controversial topic and has divided many people on whether we should continue fracking or not. Fracking is the act of creating fractures in rocks to force them open in an attempt to release oil and natural gas. Many people fear that it is damaging to do this and that it will not take long for humans to see the consequences of fracking. But others support fracking and believe that it will help us and that it we should prioritize fracking. Despite the opinions from both sides, the question still stands, should fracking be used to release oil and natural gas?One of the main reasons people want fracking to stop is because it releases greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, but fracking is actually better for the environment than coal mining. Source 1 states, “Shale gas emits half the carbon dioxide per unit of energy as does coal, and coal burning also emits metals such as mercury into the atmosphere that eventually settle back into our soils and waters.”. Fracking does less damage to the atmosphere than coal mining but yet people are trying to put an end to fracking. If America is powers their homes, cars, etc. through natural gases, coal mining will no longer be necessary and America can slow down global warming a little bit more.People who live near fracking sites are worried about the possibilities of water contamination due to the chemicals used to break apart the bedrock. Source 2 says, “Because fracking involves pumping... chemicals into the ground to
Why Fracking Is Bad
116 Words | 1 PagesWhy is fracking dangerous? During the fracking process natural gases are realized into the well where they are drilling often contaminating the nearby groundwater with methane gases and chemical toxins. After the fracking process the waste fluid is evaporated releasing volatile organic compounds causes acid rain, contaminated air, and ozone at
Flower Mound Case Study
736 Words | 3 PagesFracking involves drilling a hole into the ground and injecting a combination of fluids and chemicals into the shale. The fracking fluid contains upwards of 600 different chemicals (David). The pressure of the fluid is what causes the shale to fracture, then releases natural gas. That fracking fluid is what is really dangerous, as this is what poses the biggest threat, since many of those chemicals are extremely dangerous and some are completely unknown by the public. After the fracking process is complete, the fracking water, known as flowback, which includes water, chemicals and additives, is either collected and transferred to holding-tanks or it is injected back into the ground for storage
Arguments In Fracknation By Phelim Mcaleer
600 Words | 3 PagesThere are two sides to every argument and hydrofracturing is no different. Phelim McAleer, an investigative journalist and producer of FrackNation, uses logic to convince viewers that fracking does not pose environmental concerns. Josh Fox however, employs a multitude of logical fallacies as well as arguments based on emotions in an attempt to convince the audience that fracturing is bad for the environment. McAleer created his film to refute this opinion. Ultimately, Phelim McAleer’s documentary made a better argument than Josh Fox’s documentary.
Review Of Fracking's Problems Go Deeper Than Water Pollution By Nick Stockton
462 Words | 2 PagesSUMMARY Journalist, Nick Stockton, in the article, “Fracking’s Problems Go Deeper Than Water Pollution,” published in June 2015, addresses the topic of hydraulic fracturing and argues that fracking has more negative consequences than one might think. Stockton supports his claim first by appealing emotionally through a short summary of a recent event involving fracking and also by utilizing evidence to back up his statements. The author’s overall purpose is to highlight outcomes of fracking in order to make more people aware of issues that can arise from this common way of obtaining energy. Stockton utilizes a scientific, yet critical tone in order to create an unbiased article and appeal to his audience’s concern for the well being of the
Sandra Steingraber's When Cowboys Cry
385 Words | 2 PagesMy general overview of this article is the methods used to obtain fossil fuels is hurting people and nature all around the world. People are beginning to come to a realization about how fracking is harming the world. However, people in cities like “Buffalo, New York, Pennsylvania, and the author’s hometown
Differences And Similarities Between Gasland 2 And Truthland
1633 Words | 7 PagesPrior to watching Gasland 2 and Truthland, I am familiar with the term “fracking” but never took the time to look into it. After watching these two films, I realized how fracking is a controversial topic in the world of environmentalists. These two very different films explain how fracking is effecting the environment around us. Before explaining further into these films, we need to know what fracking really means. Fracking is “a process by which the rock is split so that natural gas can flow to the surface,” defined by Terry Engelder, a professor of geosciences at Penn State University.
Rhetorical Analysis Of John Lennon's Bad Fracking
573 Words | 3 PagesLennon says, “Within the first 20 years, methane escaping from within and around the wells, pipelines and compressor stations is 105 times more powerful a greenhouse gas then carbon dioxide” (pg#). This is really good use of this strategy because this makes an appeal to logos. This make Lennon more credible because he is using very good shocking facts in his article. This makes the readers trust him and helps his audience side with his argument of how bad fracking is. This is so because this is how the gas is getting produced is from the dangerous fracking which doesn’t just release bad greenhouse gases but also fouls our wells and makes our water undrinkable.
Pros And Cons Of Fracking In The United States
118 Words | 1 PagesThis is Keirstan, I was wondering if we could put this in as an editorial. Fracking is something that everyone needs to be aware of. There are pros in fracking, but their are also several cons. Fracking is when an oil company 's leases your land, then they start to drill holes in the ground. In those holes they put 596+ chemicals, they do this to get to the natural gas out of the ground.
Fracking Argumentative Essay
589 Words | 3 PagesFracking is a method used to extract natural gas and should be continued because it is a viable source of energy, economically beneficial, and poses no threat towards groundwater. In the first place natural gas produced by fracking is a viable source of energy. Fracking is so effective that in “4 months of a good shale well will produce enough energy to power around 11,000 homes for those 4 months,” - (Sweet). An example of the energy from fracking is: “Domestic crude production increased from 5 million barrels a day to 7.3 million barrels a day.” - (Kashi)
The Pros And Cons Of Over Fracking
850 Words | 4 PagesShould I be freaking out over Fracking? “Could you feel the earthquake?” My uncle texted me last February, after a 3.6 magnitude earthquake struck the Dallas area. Apparently, earthquakes in Dallas- Fort Worth, an area not prone to tremors, is an important enough occurrence to make the local news in Wisconsin. The earthquake on February 27th, 2015, was one of multiple earthquakes to rock the DFW area, causing researchers to question what exactly is making the earth shake.
Oil Fracking In Texas
721 Words | 3 PagesAccording to Climatecentral.org, “fracking for natural gas used to produce electricity may make Texas more drought resistant as the state shifts from coal power generation to natural gas power generation” (Magill). This could be a major breakthrough for Texas because not only would we produce electricity and save our environment, but we would also save millions of gallons of water. The amount of water we could save by shifting from coal to natural gas plants “is up to 50 times the amount of water lost in fracking to extract the natural gas from underground shale formations. According to the article, “The study’s authors estimate that for every gallon of water used to frack for natural gas, Texas saved 33 gallons of water by using that gas for electricity generation rather than producing the same amount of power with coal” (Magill).
Summary Of Fracking Threatens Everyone
225 Words | 1 PagesIn the second article "Fracking Threatens Everyone" it is stated "Fracking remains a dangerous practice that poses a threat even if it is done correctly and is carefully monitored" so it seems that the author wants people to stop Fracking because it generates dangers. It is stated "sources of drinking water can be ruined and all different types of pollution can happen in a second" which poses a great threat to many places. For example, the pollution can enter streams and rivers and kill whatever is in it, and harm even more wildlife. It says "This makes fracking a gamble for communities and individuals who may be tempted by the large amounts of money being offered to those who allow their land to be used for fracking" and the author
Thesis Statement For Fracking Essay
340 Words | 2 PagesI am really neutral on the issue. I know there are benefits to fracking for natural gas. It is better for the climate than fossil fuels, and it is cheaper. What I do not know is the extent of the damages it can potentially cause. It is a relatively new practice, and enough time has not passed to cause justification or condemnation.
Fracking Persuasive Speech
943 Words | 4 PagesPeople complain about pollution from factories, cars, global warming, and the melting of polar ice caps, yet many people disregard the dangerous that come with fracking. Fracking is the process of injecting liquid at high pressure into subterranean rocks, and/or boreholes to force open existing fissures and extract oil or gas. Fracking is causing an epidemic economically and environmentally. Fracking is continuously destroying the earth day by day. From the endless fracking today’s economy is depleting.
Fracking Persuasive Essay
679 Words | 3 PagesUsing natural gas from fracking is a better and safer alternative than using coal because natural gas does not emit as much carbon dioxide into our atmosphere. The graphs presented on natfuel.com shows that the amount of carbon dioxide
More about The Necessity of Fracking: A Discussion of its Benefits
Why Fracking Is Bad
116 Words | 1 PagesFlower Mound Case Study
736 Words | 3 PagesArguments In Fracknation By Phelim Mcaleer
600 Words | 3 PagesReview Of Fracking's Problems Go Deeper Than Water Pollution By Nick Stockton
462 Words | 2 PagesSandra Steingraber's When Cowboys Cry
385 Words | 2 PagesDifferences And Similarities Between Gasland 2 And Truthland
1633 Words | 7 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of John Lennon's Bad Fracking
573 Words | 3 PagesPros And Cons Of Fracking In The United States
118 Words | 1 PagesFracking Argumentative Essay
589 Words | 3 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of Over Fracking
850 Words | 4 PagesOil Fracking In Texas
721 Words | 3 PagesSummary Of Fracking Threatens Everyone
225 Words | 1 PagesThesis Statement For Fracking Essay
340 Words | 2 PagesFracking Persuasive Speech
943 Words | 4 PagesFracking Persuasive Essay
679 Words | 3 Pages