Many students can not really give enough time in a college because they have to rely on their jobs. If public colleges are free, people would stop worrying about the tution. There will be no boundaries for education. Everyone could get higher education which leads to many higher earning. “More people will be well educated and have better critical skills” (Anderson Ellen).
If everyone is given the same opportunity at the same start why must we prohibit the go getters that came from nothing with new thresh holds in which gives my stand on education is an equal opportunity stands on the revelations of our country’s next generation. Some people believe college tuition should be free; however, it should not, because it will devalue the college diploma, taxes will become higher, and it’s as simple as nothing in life is free. The first reason why college tuition shouldn’t be a hand out is because it would devalue the college diploma. If everyone had a diploma what makes it different from the people you’re working next too, who is going to get that promotion. Say college tuition
Having free tuition for college means that more people who cannot afford it now, would end up going. This is a good thing in terms that more people are getting a good education and continuing their educational careers to hopefully obtain good job, but it also decrease the value of a college education. If more people are able to earn degrees, it devalues them. Finding jobs even with their qualifications would be difficult (Should college be free?). This idea would also apply to the students, mainly student-athletes, that work for multiple years to try to perfect their skill and obtain full or half scholarship.
At a young age, they learn that their voice and opinion matter. Free schools enable students to operate their own learning process. They get to choose what classes they would like to take and skills they would like to learn. The students are not forced to learn a particular class. Free schools’ classes are chosen and made possible by the students.
college tuition should be paid for because, if the United States had more and more students going to college instead of going straight to jobs the economy would improve greatly. A vast majority of those who graduate from college would be getting higher paying jobs than if they hadn 't gone at all, which in the long run gives them more money to spend and therefore increases tax revenues. The increased tax revenues would enable the government to provide services to the constituents. Having more money go into the economy will help money go towards funding college however they would choose to deal with splitting the costs. This would also help small businesses because if they have more revenue coming in that can be used to grow their small business bigger.
Making college free would benefit the nation greatly, making the unemployment rate and dropout stats go down with tuition being now affordable. College being free will make fewer people who foresee other help along with people being able to do what they want without being thousands of dollars in debt. Colleges need to make education free for anyone dedicated to becoming something. To start off, free tuition will allow the student to concentrate on their studies and not jobs or debt. Most student going to college or in college have to work part-time jobs to pay for their car payment, phone bill, food, and school tuition.
College should be free in the United States for multiple reasons. These reasons include, but are not limited to, the following. College is too expensive for the majority of the population of the United States. If college was free, it would let people explore their horizon, and have an easier time finding a desirable career. College has been proven to be effective, and even shown to have been working in the united states for over 100 years.
The controversial topic about higher education has been argued and debated all over capitol hill. Some people want there to be free college for a number of reasons, and, as always, some do not. There should not be free college because then there would be nothing special about getting into an institution that delivers higher education, secondly because if there was free college then people will only take advantage of it, and finally because if there was free college it would be on someone's agenda to make college mandatory. There all kinds of colleges who pride themselves on what their rate of acceptance. Some pride themselves of having a very low rate of acceptance and there are some who pride themselves on having a high rate of acceptance.
Colleges turned away many college students because they were not able to acquire financial aid. Financial aid should be available for everyone regardless of their circumstance or more affordable when it comes to students being able to acquire a higher education. By allowing education to be free or affordable, will allow students to focus more on their education instead of having to work on the side to help pay for college. If students are more focused on their education they will have better grades and complete their degree much faster than those who must
Opposers believe that free college would be unsuccessful for three main reasons: first, free college would result in higher tax cost for the public and taxes couldn't be increased enough to provide college tuition funding; second, the tuition money is needed to provide for things like college maintenance and school supplies, and free college will lower the quality of education; and third, a college degree wouldn't mean anything because there would be no competition and colleges will be less incentivized to improve. According to opposers, the extremely high tax raise it will cause is one reason why it won't be successful. “It simply [would shift] costs from students to taxpayers,” said Andrew Kelly, resident scholar in education policy studies and director of the Center on Higher Education Reform at the American Enterprise Institute. Sanders’ plan of free college tuition would raise tax revenue by $13.6 trillion over the coming decade, according to the Tax Foundation’s report (Pianin). That would be insanely