would you want to receive genetic testing? nowadays, genetic testing is an issue that many people debate. It is a type of a medical test that identifies changes in chromosomes, genes, or proteins. The results of testing can help people to make the decisions about managing their health care. However, the results can affect very much to people who had tested. Many of the risks associated with genetic testing involve the emotion, social, and financial. the first reason we shouldn't get genetic testing is about psychologically. The results of genetic testing will impact very much to psychological. Although it can still people, it also can change the character of people. From a blithe person to a depressed person is very easy after that person got the bad results. With those people, who have weak psychology. For instance, Tuan is my friend. We studied at same high school. He was a cheerful person. But after when the after the first semester in 12th grade, he looked very sad and depressed. Everybody in class was very worried about him. Then after that a few weeks, we knew he had had the genetic testing and he got leukemia from his mother's genes. …show more content…
The genetic testing also influences on the daily life of people. As I said, from people who got the bad results and they become depressed. That is very impactful to their working. They don't really pay attention to their job, but they just think about their disease. That is understandable. In addition, some people are discriminating against people who have the disease. For example, my cousin decided to get the genetic testing 5 years ago. He was really shocked because of the results. He got Aids from his father genes. He told his story to some of his friends. Some friends are feeling sorry, but some friends were discriminating him because of his diseases. In my country, people were really discriminate with people who have Aids. That's why some people don't tell that to
I agree. In some cases, knowing that you have a mutation and will be affected with the disease could be very emotional for an individual. One never knows how they will respond to the result and pretesting counseling may not fully prepare the individual for the result. One question that has been raised is should genetic counseling be allowed for diseases that are not treatable? It is thought that if an individual knows they will develop a condition that has no treatment it could cause psychological harm, stigmatization, and possible discrimination.
In the article “Accessing Treatments: Managing the AIDS Epidemic in Ontario in Knowledge, Experience& Ruling Relations” by George W. Smith, the author pointed out how the ideology and social construction of common knowledge about AIDS influence the treatment for those patients negatively. Smith believed the general public and government have been lack of sufficient knowledge about AIDS, the AIDS patients and the government, the organization who providing the treatment are disconnected. There are still lots of people think AIDS is fatal illness disease and mainly caused by homosexuality. Smith thinks the lack of treatment for AIDS is basically due to the homophobia, labeling and prejudices formed by the public and mass media, and the government
A solution to address the stigma of the AIDS epidemic on an individual level is for friends and family members to encourage people to seek help by speaking to HIV or AIDS counselors. Also, encourage people to get tested for AIDS as well. When one is in a relationship, they should simply be honest about their condition so that other people do not contract the
HIV/AIDS is no longer one of the top 10 diseases that kill Americans. Fortunately people are no longer hiding the disease of
In chapter seven of Genetic Turning Points by James Peterson, the topic of genetic counselors is discussed in terms of their role in the genetic testing process. In my ethical opinion, genetic counselors are a necessary component of the genetic testing process. Without them, ethical lines are more likely to be crossed as I believe more patients would undergo genetic testing without fully understanding what he/ she is giving their consent for and also receive unrequested results. Additionally, I believe that the absence of genetic counselors leads to patients being pressured into receiving tests he/she did not want or ask to take. , and receive unrequested results as well.
AIDS is a condition that is caused by a condition called HIV that attacks the immune system of people, making them weaker, vulnerable and decreasing their life expectancy. This disease is transmitted by certain bodily fluids and it has affected the infectants as well as their families and friends due to social stigmas and misunderstandings about AIDS. The epidemic had a big social impact within the United States, “When AIDS appeared in the early 1980s, most of its victims were gay men. For a time the disease was known as GRID—gay-related immune deficiency. The epidemic rekindled older pseudoscientific ideas about the inherently diseased nature of homosexual bodies.”
Scapegoating, stigmatizing, and isolating those living with AIDS is an unproductive and irresponsible approach in addressing the virus that inevitably leads to death, along with rejection of the soul.
This is one of the most important guiding questions in my journey to explore deeper into the thoughts of genetic testing and how it ties together what possible effects it can have on human lives. I initially thought, if someone were to get genetically tested, they could find exactly what disease they have and how they could cure it. However, that not the case. As I was watching the documentary Cracking your Genetic Code, they discussed how genetic diseases can be very hard to diagnose if that alteration in a person's genes has not yet been found in previous patients. By analyzing many different people, doctors were able to find the breast cancer mutation.
The socio-cultural aspects that prevented and/or facilitated a faster governmental response to the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the 1980s were numerous and complex. One factor that may have prevented a faster response was stigma and discrimination towards those living with HIV/AIDS. In the early days of the epidemic, HIV/AIDS was associated with marginalized groups, such as gay men and injection drug users, and was often viewed as a moral failing. This stigma made it difficult for affected populations to come forward and seek help, and may have slowed the response of governments and public health organizations. Another factor that facilitated a response was the scientific understanding of the disease.
Ethics of Genegeneering Investigate and discuss how a society based on producing ‘designer babies’ may or may not create more happiness and greater benefits for the greater number of people. Refer to the film Gattaca, Jeremy Bentham’s Hedonic calculus, the principles of Utilitarianism and the work of Emmanuel Kant in your discussion. One of the most interesting biomedical advances in recent years, which also brings about great social repercussion is preimplantation genetic screening, which has two uses, producing babies free of genetic or hereditary diseases and the production of so called ‘designer babies.’ The 1997 film Gattaca addresses the ethical issues as well as social repercussions brought about from preimplantation genetic screening
Gattaca shows many times that genetic testing can be beneficial and has completely taken over society but at the same time provides many hardships like discrimination against certain ranks of
M6D1 Ethics and Genetic Testing As we all can agree, our genes play a highly important role in making us who we are as humans. If the information produce by genes is normal than everything can turn out normal and infants can be born healthy. There are those incidents the genetic information produce by genes is wrong and results of this information can lead to injury, disease, and/or illness of the fetus (Munson, 2012).
As technology advances, more things become possible. One of these things is genetically modifying a baby, this is very wrong. Genetic modifying or genetic engineering is altering someone or something’s DNA. Scientists hope to cure diseases with this method but doing this can lead to some harmful effects. This process is very unethical.
Should or should we not prohibit genetically engineered babies is the question to ask. After years and year of trying to figure out the cure for a disease like a mitochondrial disease, a group of professional on the topic believes that it would greatly benefit the baby ’s outcome exceptionally if their parents has harmful genetics. Most people concern would be how the baby would turn out because there have not been any clinical trials that prove that the genetics that is engineered properly work like they should. I personally believe that the genetics of baby should not be engineered, but I do believe that it should be up to the parent of the children since it is their child in the first place.
Some argue that it is against Christianity. Nonetheless, holy books does not have an explicitly written text about genetic screening. The arguments are only constructed from implications of the holy texts. As the holy texts might hold many different meanings, who can know for sure, if genetic screening is just or unjust way? As this topic is very complicated dilemma and needs a further debates to come to a common consensus, one should consider two outcomes: when it is morally accepted and when it is condemned as unethical thing to do.