People do use guns for legitimate reasons such as protection of homes, hunting, and target shooting. Therefore they do not want to put laws in place that limit this from normal citizens.(Zimring 440) This is the hard part when making laws because citizens can easily get unhappy. " Many more laws come in over the years in hope of stopping crime, but it didn’t always please the
For instance, raising the age limit for those who can carry guns will decrease irrational crimes committed by young adults. Many people involved in the government have stated similar assertions. Former United States representative, Gabrielle Giffords, “advocates for background checks to prevent criminals, domestic abusers, and seriously mentally ill people from buying guns” (Rider). Also, Presidential candidate Hilary Clinton has confirmed that one of her duties has President of the United States would be to reform gun laws and act against gun violence. Some studies have shown that gun policies reduce gun crime.
People that are fearful of mass shootings or tragedies caused by weapons have to realize that guns are needed to stop the tragedy weather it is a regular citizen or a police officer. Guns are not bad it is people that make them bad. Instead of banning guns catching criminals would be much more efficient. Gun laws are not going to solve problems they will only create more. Weather guns are used for protection or hunting or just going to the shooting range they have been around in the US for centuries and always will be.
What are the Democratic party 's views on Second Amendment gun control, the electoral college, and civil rights for ethnic and racial minorities? The Democratic party, being the older of the two main parties, has many different ideas and philosophies than the Republican party. This party 's platform had evolved and elevated itself over the years after the battered United States needed to form a stable government and decide how to lead following the bloody revolution. As the United States progressed, the parties did too.
A military grade firearm is the most common weapon used in mass shootings. Owners of military grade weapons don 't find this very dangerous because they think people who think they can control the weapon like that know how to use it properly and safely, But many people are proven wrong because of all of our recent terrorism and attacks on people with guns. But then again others can argue that because military grade weapons should only be used by our government. The military should be able to use them because they will use the weapons safely and correctly for all the right purposes. Others may say that people might want them only as a weapon because they want to keep their family safe or themselves safe rather than to hurt other people for no reason.
This is partially due to citizens being unaware of current statistics and conditions, as well as the fear of the government seizing guns acquired legally if certain bans are put into place. However, elections show that even among those against gun control, people do approve of some general regulations, like background checks and gun registration. Also, many approved of not allowing any past felons or anyone deemed mentally ill to own guns. No matter what the majority believes, however, the misuse of guns by unknowledgeable owners, not usually the guns themselves, endanger us.
Guns are attractive to kids, therefore, a secure place like a lockbox is the best option and another option is somewhere hidden and away from the reach of kids and even trespassers. Pros and Cons.org posted an article saying “Guns do not kill the people but it is the people that need the education and it is their responsibility to know how to handle and how to keep a gun secure. Education about guns to kids is a good choice because it prepares them and avoids accidents. Having the training also help to stop bad people but on the other hand, many people do not know what to do because they lack the tactics that are needed to confront a thief, therefore, the danger goes higher if there are more guns for the bad guy to use. Another part of having a gun is that arguments tend to go on a higher scale when a gun is present and in extreme cases even with family members, an example is domestic violence because if there is a gun at home the probability of a women getting shot goes up by a 500%” (Should More Gun Control Laws Be Enacted?)
As a nation, we need to unite as a whole with some common sense and help implement laws to lower gun violence. There are many reasons why the government needs to change existing laws. For instance, it is unhealthy for young children and teens to have access to these guns within arms reach. Furthermore, background checks will have a huge part in this process of reducing gun violence. Such as, reducing the amount of people who have access to guns who shouldn’t.
For instance, he stated that “It’s been said that the Second Amendment is America’s first freedom. That’s because the Right to Keep and Bear Arms protects all our other rights” (“Second Amendment rights”). Many people in the United States felt that the government should have strict laws to purchase guns, but the second amendment clearly stated that citizens have rights to purchase guns to protect themselves. Most people also believed that by purchasing guns, you can protect your family from people attacking you. Guns have many advantages in the United States and it depends on how people use or handling it.
If people were more aware of the signs and symptoms, it would be easier to encourage professional help. In order for America to become less violent mental health needs to become a priority. Unfortunately, guns are not going to disappear but it is possible that gun violence could start to disappear if accessibility to mental treatment increases in the United States.
Throughout history, especially recently, the question of whether gun control violates the 2nd Amendment has been a question which many people claim they know the answer to, but it may not be that transparent. I believe gun control is constitutional, and it deters crime and makes society safer, meaning I side with the pro-gun control ideas. Within the topic of gun control, there are many factors in which people must take into consideration when proposing an answer such as whether it deters crime, what the economic impact is, and what should be changed. NEW PARAGRAPH... Gun control can date way back, but what really made it controversial was the court case of Heller vs DC in 2008.
It will decrease the amount of mass crimes that are being committed in the United States. Studies have shown When the government outlawed something that huge, number of people very much want that outlawed item even more. This has been shown countless of times(Reed Fred,2).The endless debating conflicts in death caused by guns are why many states in order to The endless debating conflicts in death caused by guns are why many states in order to decrease the rate of violence should limit access to handguns.not only is it the government 's fault, but the people who ignore the symptoms of such mentally ill person. They also take part in not enforcing guns be in their loved one 's possession. A mentally ill man name Sergio Valen Cena Deltoro, was a veteran who served in
Anyone that thinks gun control is the answer to the killing that is going on is wrong! Nothing will change until parents start teaching their children right from wrong. Gun Control is too much of a political something you do to win a battle or to get what you want and failing. Politicians talks about the need to increase gun restrictions to stop gun crime, but new and current gun laws are designed to fail in order to allow certain people to own them and make unhappy because of not having a vote others.
Studies done after the sandy hook shooting have found that, “ Contrary to pro-gun lobby claims, research into prevention of gun violence has shown that reasonable reforms could reduce the excessively high rates of firearm deaths in the US while preserving access firearms, possession is not illegal for people proposed do not infringe on law abiding citizens ',” (Vittes 6). This has two main point to it, the first and most clearly is that it is irrelevant on what one 's believes might be, reasonable gun control will save Americans lives. The more subtle meaning behind this study was that gun lobby 's push the agenda that their companies are protected by right. The gun manufacturing business is no small group of occupations. They receive money by having customers purchases firearms, which they donate to political parties to pass different legislation.
There are many people out there who thinks that gun control laws will eliminate the crime happening now a day but it will prevent from having good guys to have the