If you pay your kids for hard work it teaches them how to work hard and I would definitely be friends with someone who is willing to help even when things get hard. According to the article “Should KIds Get Paid For Chores?” the text states “According to Marty Rossman from the university of Minnesota, adults who did chores are more likely to have good relationships”,so if you pay your kids for chores you could be the cause of their best friends. Some kids aren’t close to their parents the cause of that could have been no allowance and think about it that close relationship can happen if you just pay you child/future child for hard
(According to Blog.getwela.com,If they know they have a budget (or they are going to earn a certain amount of money for certain jobs they complete) then they have to prioritize where that money goes. If they worked hard for it, they may not want to spend it on things they previously thought they wanted or needed. Versus, asking you for it where it’s almost like a magic genie as a parent). When kids know their budget and how much money they earned for that week just like adults they think about what they need the most opposed to what they want the most. It may even motivate them to work even harder so they can be able to get what they need and what they
Chores is technically working because you have to complete a task, which needs work! Since your parents are working, they get paid. Kids are working hard to finish a task and they should get paid. This reason really shows that there needs fairness because parents get paid so kids should too!
Some of the sacrifices are spending less with family and kids, lack of sleep, and other day-to-day lifestyles that people use to enjoy. What cause these sacrifices are that they have to get two jobs. But we need to help people that are working at jobs that pay minimum wage because if we can raise the minimum wage, there will be a lot of benefits. Those benefits are lifting people out of poverty, raise job growth and can reduce income, and reduce
There is a debate between different sources on whether or not students should be getting paid for good grades. The issue is that people are being influenced by others who all agree with the claim that students should be getting paid for good grades. Although there are many claims as to why students should not be paid for good grades. One being that students should simply want to learn for themselves and their own growth. Another reason is that children would be working for money, not education when it should be the other way around to later on in life get good money and a good job.
Brent Staples is speaking about colleges around the country and how the standards that they hold the students to are changing. He believes that students these days are not earning grades as much as they are demanding them. Brent in his article is comparing how students from the past would take the grade that they were given because in that time the teacher was right in their decisions but now, because students pay so much for school they think they should automatically get a good grade. In his article he states, “Twenty years ago, students grumbled, then lived with the grades they were given. Today, colleges of every stature permit them to appeal low grades through deans or permanent boards of inquiry.
I think here shouldn 't be a reason for a teacher to stress over people that they have no obligation over. Although some people think teachers are overpaid or deserve the amount of money they make. I disagree. Many teachers can say teaching is a very stressful job.
For example if we get paid we will focus more at school more than we would if we didn 't get paid because most kids love money and if they get paid they will think of school as an actual job. We would be able to do jobs better if we get paid for doing what we are supposed to do like in a real job. Also when we get paid we are able to get more money of course and it will teach us how and what we pay for like setting a budget for how much we are payed. Plus it is able to make us more reliable for jobs.
For instance, the student is not pressured to achieve the desired results in that the professors behold them for approval in the cycle of the upward spiraling grades. Also, it presents a sensitive situation whereby the students is considered the customer who have invested in their education and hence the grades and the professors the employees thus influencing customer satisfaction. Therefore, in this model, the lectures have no leverage to push the students for the attainment of better grades. Moreover, the model has inculcated the student evaluations into the systems thus promoting grade inflation in that the model supports power shifts as the students are essential in the reappointment process (Eiszler 488). Therefore, it presents a scenario whereby the professors and other staff professionals do not have the authority to push the students.
Of course, there are some instances where people get paid minimum wage to do very difficult jobs that they should be making much more at, but for the most part the minimum wage is a useful guideline for companies to refer to when setting their wages. Today teenagers commonly think of the minimum wage and what the article refers to as a “crappy job” together. Williams writes in his articles that he and his friends
Do you think kids should get paid to do chores? I think they should because it gives us a chance to be responsible and earn money. Most kids think that we should get paid to do chores. Kids already have to clean their room, do homework, wash the dishes, etc., but by doing extra chores we think we should get paid for doing it. Megan believes that kids should get paid to do chores, but her mother thinks otherwise.
I believe to make students work harder in school and to start money managing sooner, they should get paid for having good grades. Children in school work and strive for an education, at least I hope most of them do. Students that see school as pointless and they aren’t getting anything out of it, typically don’t try their hardest. Poor grades affect both them and the school. Money could be used as a motivator to get them to try harder, it could also improve attendance rates.
I don’t think students deserve a lot of scholarship money just because of financial situations, but I will actually put the money towards a good cause. One step I plan on taking towards having a career that I love is working before playing.
The factory workers are still low paying jobs. According to Davidson, their paychecks should grow as productivity grows, but of course the companies are going to be greedy with their money and take the extra cash for themselves. These low paying jobs will never change and that is why a higher education is important in order to get a well paying job. This cycle is hard to break and many do not.
Rita Pierson, an educator of 40 years, as was her parents were as well as her grandparents. She appeals to educators on the issue of creating relationships with students, rather than just teaching a lesson she embraces each individual as a concerned educator. Being in a room full of educators means that she has to appeal to them in a way they want to learn. She does this by using powerful anecdotes to engage the audience. In the speech Every Kid Needs a Champion by Rita Pierson, she speaks to introduce, convince, and persuade educators that they should form relationships with their students due to higher academic achievement as well as self-esteem; she continues to use many rhetorical devices including soaps, ethos, pathos, and logos to achieve her argument.