Vimeo supports the open internet and they want the FCC to understand the outcome of what can happen if they take it away. By taking away the open internet you are not only hurting the consumers but also the businesses. ISPs can lose money and if that happens the business could go out of business because the consumers will move on to a different ISP that won’t block stuff of the internet.
To understand why this issue has become as important as it is today, increasing the internet community’s arrogance, we have to realize that the right to privacy and free speech that is promised to us through the amendments plays an important role in this decision making. In the digital age the owners and content creators of media platforms have a lot of control and influence on modern speech and how we as a society communicate. At first the idea seems like it would enhance the first amendment since it encourages equal access of content to the users, however, what most people tend to disregard is the fact that it also violates it by potentially having the internet providers transmit content to their consumers against their
The original concept of firewalls was to provide a safe place to conduce affairs without being overly concerned that your network had the possibility of being attacked. This is the same concept that a person has in your home or business, there are secure boundaries with respectable walls, lockable doors and windows and even perhaps an alarm system, so a person should feel secure in a home or business, with a personal or office firewall to protecting and allowing the freedom to conduct life or business. Since most American internet traffic is held within the United States and United States “Great” firewall would cause a few issues average American internet consumers. The United States has only a few central internet locations and backbones that could be used directly for an American “Great” firewall defense sites.
The Open Internet Project defines net neutrality as “the idea that your cellular, cable, or phone internet connection should treat all websites and services the same”. Seems simple, right? II. The reason I am bringing net neutrality up is because the idea that all your internet content is equal is under threat. Under this new administration, the net neutrality rules put in place during the Obama Administration are very soon as risk to being repealed.
As in the today’s growing world of technological advancement and information, digital reputation is seen as the vastly prevailing state of reputation. On the other side, the internet and online social networks have become the inevitable and unescapable part of our social lives and has basically changed our personal opinions and reputes with significant consequences. As sensible individuals of society, we have to pick and choose the pros and cons of such changes. It would assist and tell us to which extent and how we can rely more on online information in decision making of social interactions. We need to preclude ourselves from the possible damages of online defamation along with privacy invasion in the race of benefiting from this age of
IV. OBJECTIONS TO NETWORK NEUTRALITY This section explains arguments from opponents of the net neutrality principle, revolving around the following ideas: 1. Uncontrolled dataflow unfairly penalizes those that deliver data; 2. Increased revenue for ISP’s fosters greater infrastructure development; 3. Strict neutrality rules favor large IT companies that consume more bandwidth; A key issue noted by opponents of net neutrality is the fact that high-bandwidth services disproportionately benefit from the networks.
These three important rules work together to prevent information from being withheld from consumers and to keep the internet equal for all of its users. Mr. Wheeler, the former chairman of the FCC, made it so the internet service providers are regulated like utilities (Messina). However, large companies and ISPs, Internet Service Providers, have debated
International internet restriction could only create unneeded problems and further separate cultures across the globe. Net neutrality is a vital concept that provides a framework to success for the future of information technology. Legislation created by the United States will set precedent for the rest of the world. There is still time to repeal the FCC’s ruling, however society must act fast and efficiently. While most of the describe could be a worst-case scenario, it is still very possible.
To control and to suppress is the reason why we need law. Many people hold strong on the belief that internet should be a place where information and data flows freely. Yet, from the government point of view, freedom isn’t always a good thing. There is also a point of view to counter and protect against child pornography or hate speech. Others include religious factor, terrorism as well as other sensitive information for different group of people in terms of age, countries and parties.
Prabhakar Pillai, author or “Pros and Cons of Censorship”, states “It [censorship] prevents the public display of disrespect to any particular individual or community.” Racism, sexism, and other forms of hates towards a group of people wouldn’t be all over the internet. Cyberbullying could be diminished. Geoff Yang then goes on to say, “We need censorship to keep the dimly lit corners of cyberspace safe.” Nowadays, simply voicing your opinion, or even not owning up to society’s idea of “perfect”, can result in cyberbullying. Censorship could even save lives. Prabhakar Pillai, author of “Pros and Cons of Censorship”, says “Scenes of people consuming alcohol or smoking influence people to copy them.” Seeing others suffer from substance abuse may peak others’ curiosity, which could lead them down the same path.
In other words, we can have free communication. For normal web users, the entire source of the internet is freely available. Losing the freedom of internet access could result in restricted access to websites; fewer download rights and so on. The topic of net neutrality has become controversial because several companies are trying to take away the freedom of internet access. There are people who think net neutrality is ethical; there are several reasons for it.
Net Neutrality has been a major problem. Yet many people are not aware of what it is and how it can benefit people who use the internet. Net Neutrality is the principle that the internet service providers and governments should treat all data on the internet equally, not discriminating or charging differently by who user, content, site, platform, application, type of attached equipment, or modes of communication. With net neutrality the government cannot control or regulate the internet. The president strongly supports net neutrality and making laws for the internet to be open.