How should the United States and other nations deal with North Korea and Iran and their development of nuclear weapons technology. The chief of The Los Angeles Times.
“In 1984, George Orwell wrote of a world where the only color to be found was in the propaganda posters. Such is the case in North Korea. Images of Kim Il-sung are depicted in vivid colors. Rays of yellow and orange emanate from his face: he is the sun”. Barbara Demick. There are many reasons why the United States and other nations should come together and stop North Korea and Iran from getting nuclear weapons. One thing to remember is what would happen if they launched nuclear missiles at a country. That country would probably launch them back then that’s an excuse for more countries to launch their missiles. There is a danger with North Korea and Iran having a nuclear and ballistic trade relation.
We as a nation need to make sure that North
…show more content…
It could go many different ways, say they target a major country like Russia then Russia with all the nuclear weapons their country has could destroy North Korea, which isn’t the bad part. In the result of North Korea being destroyed, when that country is destroyed its allies will launch missiles at Russia then again Russia will launch them back. Eventually Nuclear Warfare will start and the death total would increase rapidly. For example if the United States got involved which we probably would some country could launch a missile at say New York City where 8.406 million people live most of those people would die. Another major country that would most likely get involved would be China someone could target Hong Kong where 7.188 million people live most of them would die. So if most of the people in just those two cities were to die the death total would already be 15.594 million people. There is also the risk of countries targeting government
In terms of U.S. foreign policy, Reagan would now be questioned on how to apply a revitalized containment plan. When it came to dealing with the future relationship between the U.S. and the Soviets, Ambrose indicates how Reagan’s goals were not very different from any previous president. “Reagan’s goals were peace, limitations on the arms race, an actual reduction in the size of nuclear arsenals..” (Ambrose 320). The problem which Ambrose brought up were the means of attaining those goals.
The spread of nuclear weapons is important because the United States can prevent any sort of nuclear conflict. Whether it is the US attacking another country, or another country attacking the US. After a group of Iranian students stormed the American embassy in Tehran, the US government was keeping a watchful eye on nuclear proliferation in the United States and in Iran. In January of 1979, Ronald Reagan was in Jacksonville when he made a statement regarding nuclear proliferation in the United States, “‘...Unilaterally the United States seems to be the only nation in the world that’s trying to stop the proliferation of nuclear weapons.’” (Rafshoon
Before his election to the presidency, Dwight Eisenhower sought to contain the atom’s destructive power (). Yet, in his first speech at the United Nations as President of the United States, Eisenhower argued for the normalization of the international proliferation of nuclear technology (Office of the President, 1953). The motivation behind his now famous “Atoms for Peace” speech illuminates an interesting contradiction between the obvious American nonproliferation objectives and the president’s political calculation. The key to understanding this contradiction is to separate Eisenhower’s contemporary political motivations from the consequences of the president’s choice to pursue international proliferation of peaceful nuclear technology.
As said by Izhar Cohen, “the nuclear genie of how to make an an atomic bomb is out of the bottle, which means other nations or terrorists can obtain them and destabilize deterrence.” Izhar Cohen makes a point that the process of making an atomic bomb isn't a secret hence giving the U.S. another reason for them to keep their nuclear weapons. Because the process of making nuclear weapons is spreading, the U.S. needs to keep them for safety reasons. He also makes a point that terrorists could obtain them therefore making anyone without nuclear weapons an immediate target, giving the U.S. another reason to keep their nuclear
The USSR is an ever growing threat to world peace. After the war, they may simply replace Nazi Germany as the new tyrannical power in the world. This bomb, however, would dissuade them. President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb was a necessary evil.
Especially since Eisenhower believed in massive retaliation, which was funding the stockpiling of nuclear weapons and less funding to the army. Eisenhower’s policy had backlash from both conservatives and liberals. As stated in Document E, “...whether a policy accepting the first blow may be the best one.” People believed that massive retaliation was not the best way to avoid nuclear war. Document E serves the purpose of showing the faults of massive retaliations and how in the grand scheme it isn’t a sufficient way to keep away from a nuclear war.
Efforts that able to do is to reduce the world's nuclear stockpile and change nuclear into energy that makes beneficial to society. The program from Republican Party is called Nuclear Forces and Missile Defense Imperiled aims to protect the safety of American citizens from terrorist and nuclear attacks. This is a terrible case of nuclear war because the nuclear defense in America is weak. Government must always be wary of competing countries such as Russia and China that have a great nuclear power. Not only from that country, threats and other dangers possible attack also come from other places such as Iran and North Korea that are currently developing a nuclear
These aspects are made up of nuclear capability, testing areas, and the military itself. NK is one of the few nations capable of producing nuclear weapons. Some of these weapons are atomic bombs, thermonuclear bombs, and intercontinental bombs. Along with nuclear weapons were testing areas. These bombs were tested on restricted areas underground and above ground, showing NK’s nuclear development.
Szilard recommends alternatives that should be pursued and that America reexamines its position on the use of atomic bombs. Finally, Leo gives out reasons why it would be a bad idea for America to attack
The art of fear is essential in nuclear deterrence. Using the film Dr. Strangelove (Stanley Kubrick, 1964) I will argue that nuclear deterrence is hard to achieve when communication of nuclear capabilities is not well established amongst states. In this paper, I will use the film Dr. Strangelove (1964) to argue how theories such as deterrence theory, realist theory, security dilemma, preventative war, pre-emptive war as well as relative gains and zero sum game led to a failure to achieve nuclear deterrence between the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. To make my argument on how more nuclear weapons may hinder deterrence, this essay will proceed as follows; I will firstly discuss the how nuclear deterrence and mutually
The American government is associated as being one of the best and most efficient governments in the world. The American government was made by the citizens for the citizens of the United States. That’s why people think that the American government works so well. There are other governments on the other hand, that suppress their citizens. Governments where the citizens have no say in their government and can only let the government do what they want.
North Korea is a mysterious place to outsiders but from the inside it may seem normal because the people have no sense of reality or awareness. In the novel 1984 a made up character named ‘Big Brother’ is much like Kim Jong-Un in our world. There are two parties outer and inner and the inner parties consist of people from the inside and the wealthier class unlike the outer witch holds the middle class. The outer party of 1984 worship Big Brother and most are forced to because they are being watched by spies and telescreens (surveillance systems). North Korea is very similar to 1984 due to the constant surveillance and the cult of personality.
The government officials showed their concerns regarding the use of nuclear nukes and technology and even tried to convince Harry S. Truman that the outcomes of a nuclear
Nuclear bombs is a sort of technology that would hurt the human race if released into the world more than once. As well as our technology use to “help” us, but instead gets rid of our focus in life and makes us lazy to do anything to the world or try to succeed in helping the world. Technology humans created would soon be our desintegration. Once again as Omar Bradley once told the world, we shouldn’t be arrogant or incoherent to continue with technology without the proper safety regulations that needs to be sent across the universe. Without the proper security humanity will soon perish with the use of our own
There have been many incidents in which nuclear weapons were almost launched because of accidents and miscalculations. Many nuclear weapons have been taken apart and scrapped. Some countries got rid of them all together, but many countries still maintain their weapons. Nuclear weapons are bad for the environment Nuclear weapons have the capacity to destroy all complex life forms on Earth and its the only device ever created to do that. If only 0.1% of all nuclear weapon explosive would cause widespread famine and a agricultural collapse.