“We are serious about replacing fossil fuels, we are going to need nuclear power, so the choice is stark: We can keep on merely talking about a carbon-free world, or we can go ahead and create one, ” stated Peter Thiel , a partner in Founders Fund, in a column on nuclear power in the New York Times, urging the world to take immediate action to limit climate change. It was estimated that the amount of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels reached a record high of 36. 1 billion metric tons in 2013, that was 706 metric tons more than in 2012. (Zolfagharifard, 2015) Carbon dioxide is the main greenhouse gas emission that contributes to the global climate change, which has become a growing concern in the past few …show more content…
The nuclear energy is produced in the nuclear reaction through the nuclear fission, while the fossil fuels was produced by chemical reaction and it is estimated that a fission reaction is roughly a million times more energetic than a chemical reaction. Nuclear energy requires very little quantity of fuel to produce large quantities of energy. When one gram of uranium-235 undergoes nuclear fission in reactor, the energy it produces is equal to the burning of three tonnes of coal or two tonnes of oil. Moreover, nuclear energy produces millions of times more powerful, for example, 1 kg of coal could keep a light bulb lit for four days, while same amount of nuclear fuels could lit the same bulb up for 685 years. (Nuclear Industry Association, N/A) Additionally, The United Nation (2015) estimated that by the year of 2030, the world population will reach 8.5 billion, and by the year of 2015, it will reach over 11 billion. The growth of the global demand for energy is projected to skyrocket over the coming decades, as a consequence, with its high level of efficiency , nuclear energy is the only energy source that is capable of producing powerful energy as well as satisfying the global …show more content…
In fact, the reactor in the Chernobyl accident was one of those Soviet designed and built reactors that have always been a safety concern for years , the accident was the result of a flawed design that was operated insufficient trained personnel, so basically it had very little relevance to the rest of the nuclear reactors and to the western ones or the ones that might be built today. (World Nuclear Association, 2015) According to report of United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation on Chernobyl accident, apart from the increased thyroid cancers, “there is no evidence of a major public health impact attributable to radiation exposure two decades after the accident.” (UNSCEAR, 2008) Additionally, nuclear power was actually saving more lives than it killed. NASA had found that between 1971 to 2009, nuclear power had prevented 1.8 million air pollution-related deaths. (Hansen, 2013) On the other hand, people keep burning fossil fuels, creating countless cases of cancer or lung diseases , and accidents that happen in coal mines can not be avoided. (Kurzgesagt, 2015) The safety level of nuclear power plants is high and increasing, the consequences of accidents are relatively low compared with risks resulting in burning of the fossil fuels. To sum up, the benefits of the nuclear
In “Nuclear Power is Not the Answer,” Helen Caldicott argues that pursuing nuclear energy would be a detriment to the United States. According to Caldicott, nuclear power, contrary to what the industry claims, is not clean and green, but rather a pollutant and a strong contributor to the destruction of the ozone layer. Because of the availability of uranium ore steadily decreasing, the process is requiring more and more fossil fuels to extract the ore. Caldicott projects that within ten to twenty years, nuclear reactors will be counterproductive because of the amount of fossil fuel it will take to mine the remaining uranium. In addition to air pollution, nuclear power plants also emit radioactive gases and materials that have the potential
The general attitude by the public towards nuclear reactors is that of fear or disapproval simply due to its name or the rumors. Nuclear reactors are merely devices that sustain chain reactions, in which only one of the emitted neutrons hits another nucleus to create fission. Though nuclear reactors cannot become a weapon or a bomb, some of the dangers relate to our lives to the extent that we may need to seek alternatives, as demonstrated by the reactors in Three Mile Island and Chernobyl. Nuclear reactors operate on chain reaction, which does not grow due to neutron multiplications of 1. They depend on slow neutrons—in explosion, they are only as powerful as TNT.
Nuclear power produces fewer carbon emissions than traditional energy sources because energy is not produced by burning molecules but splitting atoms. ‘An energy mix including nuclear power has the lowest impact on wildlife and Ecosystems’ as shown by a Conservation Biology paper. Consequently, greenhouse gas emissions have reduced by nearly half which shows the benefits and popularity of nuclear power use. Nuclear power has many environmental benefits such as small waste production, leaves no adverse effect on water, land or any habitats. By reducing fossil fuel consumption and switching to Nuclear Energy, we will sustain the environment, quality of air, improving the overall quality of
I hope to tell you what nuclear fusion is and when it was discovered. I hope to talk about the dangers involved with nuclear fusion and will it be controlled. I want to talk a bit about some previous nuclear disasters that humanity has faced in the past. I hope to talk a little bit about nuclear waste. I also hope to talk about some applications of nuclear energy in the 21st century.
One of these fuels is known as the element thorium. Thorium has great potential to be a reactor fuel because it outputs far more energy at the same cost, as well as being a safer material to use in the event of a nuclear meltdown (“Pros and Cons”). Another pro of nuclear energy is its relative safety compared to other sources of energy. Fossil fuel energy comes with a high rate of accidents and death. Mining accidents, oil rig explosions, and illnesses such as lung cancer and other ailments are far more common to occur than issues with nuclear reactors.
The China Syndrome Analytical Essay The nuclear industry has many positive and negative aspects. For example, nuclear power plants provide power for a city without emitting large amounts of carbon dioxide but also risk catastrophic nuclear meltdowns. A SCRAM situation is when a rapid emergency shutdown of a nuclear reactor occurs in an attempt to prevent major destruction.
Nuclear energy may be the solution that eliminates our concern for energy production in the future, but it still remains a huge issue for the environment. Despite its wide use in many developed countries, nuclear energy poses many threats to both the
Probably words like radiation, mutations and Homer Simpson pop into your head. However, that is not the case. According to Mark A. Jones, Director of Nuclear Operations and Engineering at Hutchinson Island Nuclear Power Plant, during our interview stated: “Nuclear energy compared to solar energy brings less of an impact because nuclear energy doesn 't emit air pollution unlike other forms of energy. It also only needs the fraction of land the salon energy needs and self-contain its own waste from polluting the environment.”
There is a quote by President Barack Obama saying, “To truly transform our economy, protect our security, and save our planet from the ravages of climate change, we need to ultimately make clean, renewable energy the profitable kind of energy,” (“151 Inspiring Environmental Quotes”). He believes as many due that nonrenewable resources are harmful to all aspects of life. The energy we use now is harmful to our planet, to humans, and to animals. Scientists are taking steps to making the world a better place. They found sources that replenished naturally in a short amount of time and are less destructive in all aspects.
Nuclear energy is something that we`ve all heard about. It carries risk and potential. When an atom (Uranium and Plutonium in nuclear power plants) is bombarded by neutrons, it can be split, causing fission. This fission releases more neutrons, which causes a chain reaction. Nuclear power plants use this use the heat that is created by fission to heat water that spins their turbines (“Nuclear Energy”).
Climate Change This quote said by Washington State Governor, Jay Inslee shows the severity of climate change “We are the first generation to feel the sting of climate change, and we are the last generation that can do something about it.” “On Earth human activities are changing the natural greenhouse of the Earth.” (A blanket around the Earth). Burning fossil fuels is causing carbon dioxide to be released into the air.
1. Introduction: Carbon dioxide (CO2) is one of the important green house gases (GHGs) emitted in the atmosphere through various human and natural activities. The human activities include rapid industrialization and urbanization, deforestation, excessive use of fertilizers in agriculture, excessive use of fuels, papers and many other manmade resources whereas natural activities include volcano eruption, forest fires, earthquakes etc. Emission of GHGs in the atmosphere leads to global warming which is one of the primary reasons behind the atmospheric changes that affect the human life directly or indirectly. The consequences of global warming are extremely harsh seasons, untimely rains, extended summers and floods that results in human deaths, destruction of flora and fauna in addition to the huge economical losses.
Then there are the pro’s nuclear provides a huge amount of energy and does not make CO2 destroying the ozone or doesn’t create smog. So my point of view that are talks and discussion solidfied is going to seem like a cop out but I believe nuclear power is good
Nuclear power plants can be dangerous, extremely dangerous, every thirty years something bad has happened at a nuclear power plant, and if we keep having them every thirty years there will be another accident if we continue to let them be built around the country, I am highly against them because of all the meltdowns that have happened. Nuclear power plants are known to have meltdowns and accidents, but when they take lives or harm people is when they need to shut down until everything can be cleaned up, but sometimes that doesn’t happen, sometimes they take care of the injured person or persons and then start working again which could only result in more accidents and meltdowns in the future which could be more harmful. Now, melt downs aren't
The Chernobyl disaster happened in 1986 had documented many radiation-related fatalities leaving obvious nightmares in history. Due to the negative impacts of radiation, about 550 million people were facing with the major threat of thyroid cancer. Following this scary Chernobyl disaster, we witnessed four nuclear reactors exploded in Japan after the attack of Tsunami in March, 2011 causing nuclear radiation leakage which might as well cause a global concern of the radiation-related