A lot of teens just want a car to drive, they do not really drive the proper way. The driving age should be changed to 18. If the driving age was changed it will only effect the younger drivers as in the 16 year olds. The problem with the current driving age is
Our lives are unbelievably valuable so we should do everything rational to avoid deaths. Nowadays, teenagers are specifically dangerous due to their recklessness and they are the ones that are more likely to commit car accidents. Delaying when they get their driver’s license, the roads will be more secure. If the age of driving is increased, the amount of car crashes will decrease. For instance, teens think that they’re fearless, which is why they take silly risks unlike mature drivers.
So the teenagers are the main benefit because of many reasons but unfortunately they would take subject of raise driving age as a punishment. Raise driving age would save teenagers lives. Expects said that teenagers brains are not completely progress until the teenage years passed so they would not take driving seriously and they never think that they may have death accident in the beginning. For example, when the teenager start driving, his driving will be unsafe because he does not have the ability to understand how dangerous it is. In other words, teenagers should be more mature and trustworthy to deserve
Fischer who was interviewed at the New York International Auto Show tells CNN Money Watch, that by looking towards new crash mitigation technology it will worn the driver if an accident is about to occur. Moreover, it will automatically hit the breaks for the driver if there is something impending. This not only explains the ways in which travelling would become safer by depending on technology, it also shows that these technological advances could go on to save lives. Not only does research show that humans are more accident prone, but when using driverless cars not only would less accidents occurs it could also lead to the prevention of accidents, for humans, on
This may mean that they would rush thing when trying to get their driving license. One other min reason could be because it would be breaking the adult rights in Britain if they weren’t allowed to get their driving license by the age of eighteen, this is because above this age they are responsible for all their actions. One of the ways that could happen so that it could limit the amount of deaths each year with out hanging the age limit for a driving license would be that they could, raise the difficulty of the driving tests, so that they can only pass once they are complete safe. It would also mean that the people passing their tests are completely capable for driving safely. One other solution could be that, once the person has passed their test they would have does a certain amount of miles by them self’s with out a passenger unless it’s a member of their family.
Driving at high speed will also put you in danger. You also you need to be responsible for yourself and your car. If you get a flat tire no one is going to help you fix it, you need to know how to do it yourself. Driving age should not be raised to 21 because it make the person responsible for himself and have a better experience in life. A major reason why the driving age should not be raised is that teenagers have to be responsible for themselves.
The legal drinking age should not be lowered to eighteen because it will give high school and even middle school students greater access to alcohol, interfere with brain development, adult rights begin at twenty-one, and increase traffic accidents among the youth. Lowering
But no matter the experience or how much they have been taught teenagers have one problem, maturity. Stated in passage one, “the new brain research suggests that a...new 17- or 18-year-old driver is considered safer than a new 16-year-old driver.” The drivers age extremely matters because of their maturity, when someone's brain is fully developed with still no experience is much better because of their emotions and reactions. 16-year-olds just aren't ready to take on the responsibilities of driving on the road with others that they could hurt or even
These people are not wrong, humans are not perfect creatures, putting us in a fast moving object is bound to cause problems sooner or later. Often is the case where these problems turn out to be fatal. So the clear answer to solving these issues is to remove the human element, without humans roads would be a safer place. At least that is the concept behind driver-less or self-driving cars. Google is one of the companies leading the charge against this problem.
For example the age limit to join the army or to get married is 16 but to drink alcohol and get a tattoo it’s 18. They state that it is inequality and unnecessary to divide those into groups of ages and that everyone should be combined as one. Yet again, their argument is fair and quite true but they don’t acknowledge the fact that the government has placed these rules and age limits to prevent frantic behaviour. If no limits existed we’d have a whole different world: Children from the age of 10 could be driving, possibly causing harm to themselves and others. A daily basis of only adults smoking could change and evolve into the whole population, from all ages, getting into that unhealthy habit.
The point of view differed from issues and controversies reason being that it did not converse regarding to the newer technology offered for vehicles. It only mentioned the government and its laws that were needed to be imposed for the citizens, along with statistics from past years about deaths on how they have decreased. When database two in article one “Driving Gets Safer, But Not Enough,” states that the major distracted driving problems is not only in the United States but worldwide. This has us thinking about all the lives that are lost daily. It is done well the way the authors explain certain materials in their articles, having us think and question more than one of their claims.
People are taught to learn from their mistakes but what do you learn from if there are none? If people are not getting in trouble and you are not getting any consequences for certain things then what is going to stop people from doing them. Littering and speeding is going to become more and more acceptable and the world is going to become dirtier and more people are going to get hurt or die from crashes. That is just two of the things just imagine if people did not have any of these minor offenses, our once beautiful nation might turn into complete anarchy. Secondly people need to not look at these as more of a warning.
Driving at Sixteen Driving at 16 is a right of passage steeped in tradition. For decades, teens have received their driver 's licenses at 16. While some might say this is too young and seek to raise the minimum age to 18, generations of teens have successfully managed the responsibilities of driving. The minimum driving age of 16 should not be raised because it would increase transportation problems, keep teens from fulfilling responsibilities, and prevent oversight of new drivers. Raising the driving age would cause transportation difficulties in families.
However the law seems to contradict itself if incarcerating a 11 year old seems to fix the answer. All it really does is lead them to more trouble later on in life. It is cruel punishment because it should be obvious that trialing a juvenile as an adult is unfair due to the fact that their age truly defines them as what they are, a juvenile. If they are viewed as “adults” then they should be allowed privileges that are only given to adults. But that is not the case.
Every time we face problems we tend to come out with easiest and simple solutions to fix them; however, sometimes these solutions create bigger problems and they are harder to solve. For instance, Robert Strange McNamara was concerned with the deaths and injuries from car accidents. The easiest and simple solution that he came up to avoid car accidents was the invention of seat belts. Even though wearing a seat belt did not take too much effort, for people wearing a seat belt meant that cars were not safe. This belief caused the sale of cars to drop.