Persuasive Essay On Shoot To Kill

938 Words4 Pages
As stated by the Human Rights Committee target killing should be used as a punishment and the principle of proportionality should be given utmost consideration. The guidelines to the military commander and complaints should be spelled out clearly. All the measures to arrest a person who is suspected to commit attacks of terror should be exhausted.
In some areas, states have clearly adopted shoot to kill policies. , the High Commissioner for Human Rights has emphasized on ensuring that every act of counter terrorism, from the police to prison officers must be within the law. Extreme vigilance should be applied by the ones in power. There should not be any form abuse of power and there should be a culture of respect for law. Human rights law permits the use of lethal force to save any hum. Similar to invocations of ‘targeted eliminating, ' shoot-to-kill can be used to suggest a fresh strategy and to recommend that it 's futile to use inside regulations in the facial skin of terrorism and life
The protection against arbitrary deprivation of life is non-derivable under international and regional human rights law. Measures should be taken to prevent arbitrary killing. Matter of utmost gravity is where the authorities deprive the right of life of a person. Hence, the law must control the conditions in which a person may be deprived of his right to life.
To be able to be viewed lawful, the utilization of dangerous power should generally adhere to the theory of prerequisite and
Open Document