If that doesn’t happen, the government must find another way to finance their budget. On the other hand, California is a divided state, which makes hard to pass bills. Thus, the addition of two-third majority and 50% plus one is essential for raising taxes. But the political parties refuses to work together because they have different point of views from the economy. The republicans think that raising taxes won’t solve any problem.
We’ve been trying to get rid of the Electoral College for the past couple years now, but we as the people have failed to act and therefore they will put it to the side and say “Don't worry, we will get to it”. No longer should we stand for this we have to insure that votes are actually making a difference in our country. What is the point not voting if we are just ignored and tossed aside? The Electoral College is the sole reason why some people just do not care about voting, because they feel like they don't make a difference in the matter, and that is correct in some degree because the Electoral College makes it that
Many people all around the country probably won’t certainly agree with the author of A More Perfect Constitution by Larry Sabato. Larry Sabato main idea was that the United State Constitution was outdated and needed to be reform somehow. He believed a change to the Constitution will going to be really hard due to the massive number of traditional political conservatives that the country had. Sabato explain that these conservatives’ people will oppose to the idea of different view of the Constitution by saying “the Constitution is just good as it is”. The conservatives’ support only their views as the Constitution was just fine the way it is, and it was original because that was the intent of the founders in how to interpret the Constitution.
For example, immigration reform has been being considered since past President Barack Obama was reelected in 2012, as stated by The Washington Post (Nakamura, O’Keefe 4). In the past six years the progress in advancing immigration reform has been miniscule because the drastically different opinions on how severe the reform should be. Some people, mainly liberals, disagree wholly with immigration reform because it contradicts the American ideal of all people, no matter their race, religion or gender, being welcome in the country, as well as, the distinction between refugees and immigrants. Others believe that, to continue to prosper, America can only solve American problems and to take on the responsibility of more people is detrimental to America’s wellbeing. And despite immigration being considered a “national crisis”, the Senate still, through a vote, prevented the progress of a bill that
Most of the predictions are so general that they are hard to prove or disprove. For instance, she predicted, “More people will start eating better to cut down on obesity” and “New values begin to emerge very slowly, but we get back to caring for each other more.” They are vague and very difficult to prove one way or another. Other predictions seem more like opinions such as “I am still worried about train travel” and “We are not going to be overly taxed.” However, when she does give specific predictions, they are often just outright wrong. Examples are “Obama will not be reelected,” “The next president will be a Republican.” For the record, Obama was re-elected in 2012 as a Democrat! She also predicted, “There will be a cure found for M.S.” and “There will be a tsunami in Florida in the fall.” These are glaring examples of her failures.
Controversy with Head Start goes all the way back to President Johnson because many believe the government should not be paying for anything for the poor. Many people view it as a hand out and are strongly against government handouts to people. People think that the government spend way to much money on it. Some hava the completely opposite view point and think head start is the best program offered to anyone. Some think the government spending money on a system that allows students to get a chance at higher level learning is worth it because they are investing in the kids who will grow and pay taxes one
Perhaps if this presidential candidate were elected as President of The United States, then this fantasy world of common motivation, and joint efforts could become a reality. Although this is very unlike as mentioned, most people of America are too worried about self gain and self interest, and the facade of society places a biased view on anything linked to communism. Too many immediately reject any idea of communism. It can be seen that not significant work was done in the world in “Anthem” and that extreme forms of communism are likely to fail, but a less extreme form like socialism could possibly save the world from corruption, and could bring the world back together as
President Obama is leaving office soon, and many people think there is not a lot of change he can do anymore because he is simply running out of time. President Obama made it clear that he was not going to leave office without trying to help the nation one last time. He decided to endorse Mrs. Clinton as the next president. There have been multiple times when he has spoken out and against Mr. Trump and his comments, and Mr. Trump in return has also made disgusting remarks against President Obama. Even though he spoke against one candidate, it did not mean he automatically endorsed Mrs. Clinton.
“This approach is bad economic policy and bad education policy. An unprecedented federal spending increase for education will not improve economic growth -- and past experience strongly suggests that this plan will not improve American educational performance” (lips 2). Increasing school funding the wring way can cause the economy a lot of money and may lead to huge budget cuts or even jobs lost. There is a lot of public school across America that are underfunded so trying to fund them would cost a lot of money. Increasing school funding is very risky because if the graduation rates don’t go up when students get older they would face the problem of being in debt and won’t know how to pay it off .
They believed that the New Deal didn’t do enough, but other letters argued that it wasn’t enough: “government spending … has reached a point where it is creating a mountainous debt which future taxpayers will have to shoulder … a large group of people [would] much rather ‘get along’ on what they receive from the dole than to [work],” (“Four Views of the New Deal”). Due to the large variance and lack of a commonality in the nature of people’s complaints about the New Deal, there wasn’t any change that FDR could make that would keep everyone happy; he could only continue on his current reform
Another instance when the American government 's involvement upon request had a positive effect on their citizens is the social insurance program designed to provide a steady income for retired workers aged 65 or older. Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) realizing the rising epidemic quickly took action. Without this form of assistance for the government this country 's poverty rate would be disgustingly high. FDR expresses his opinion on the Social Security Act, he says“we can never insure one hundred percent of the population against one hundred percent of the hazards and vicissitudes of life,” he hopes that despite his inability to completely shield his citizens from the hardships of life he can still protect them from some of them.
Supports of free community college believe the educational opportunities would help poor Americans succeed in society, closing the wage gap. There are also many strongly opposed to free community college and find many faults in the President’s plan. Free community college would greatly effect this country. Whether good or bad, its impact would be felt across the nation.
Don’t you hate when your taxes go to making useless pennies or when they take up space in a mess. Even though people think pennies are helpful they are not because they cost 2.41 to make just one. For years the Unites States have been discussing if we should get rid of the penny. Pennies shouldn’t be made in the United States. Source 1 states, other countries have got rid of the penny and were successful.
Delayed and inexperienced decisions such as this can sway the opinion of one who should be voting for the best candidate. When President George W. Bush was reelected in 2004, the people who voted him thought that he would be able to stimulate the economy and create jobs. However, once the voters realized that he was unable to run the country as productively as they wanted him to do, his popularity faded. This resulted in Congress and President Bush popularity votes dropping to all-time lows of 38 percent and 28 percent respectively (Milakovich & Gordon, p.8). These numbers resulted in voters believing they should vote democratic as opposed to Republican, in which added to the victory of Barack Obamas election to the
The article from 1873 shows that the state was trying to curb the probability of railroad monopolies, while not everyone supported it.1 So then when the state government did pass a piece of legislation that limited the prices that railroad companies could charge2, those with personal financial interest in the railroads were highly against the bill. The antagonists of the bill, particularly those who were stockholders, then voted to back their company in opposing the legislation3, to the point of legal action in hopes to slow the bill and give it reason to be looked at in federal courts, as it then became a question of constitutionality of the bill.4 Together, these sources answer the question that the railroads were heavily contested, with two very different sides. One there was the state and those who were concerned with the railroads getting too large and potentially forming monopolies; on the other there is those who support the railroads, weather for economic or personal reasons. While these sources do not show the final outcome of the dispute, they do confirm that the Wisconsin Railroad wars were a real thing, even receiving national attention. These source do answer the question, but as I continue research, I hope to find the final outcome, as well as further flesh out the dispute, but this is at least a good broad