Search for literature or research that will help you answer this question. Summarize and cite it here. Explain Lo, Bernard, and Lindsay Parham. " Ethical Issues in Stem Cell Research."
The essay “Best Hope Lies in Privately Funded Stem Cell Research”, states the importance of stem cell research and the effects it can have on curing disease more effectively than any other method. Written by Sigrid Fry-Revere, PhD, director of bioethics studies at the Cato Institute; the author of the paper emphasizes the importance of funding programs for stem cell research on highlights the government holding out on funding due to ethical reasons. Revere claims that the government is threatening the private investing of stem cell research organizations and are trying to put a stop to production of research. This essay is targeted for people who are academic/bioethics orientated and the future of the world disease control and abolishment.
Though there have since become guidelines, for much of the first half century of cell research all projects were riddled with a lack of ethical treatment of the patients and the exploitation of them and their cells. Despite the gripes of the patients, especially those whom are mentioned by Skloot, they are largely ignored in favor of the money making giant that is the cell growing
In both of these excerpts they talk of genetic engineering, but with what one is the right way to go about it? Both sides have numerous good points and arguments. Genetic engineering is a method that scientists use to clone things such as sheep back in the day. Today genetic engineering can help with diseases such as parkinson's. So the debate is to decide whether it is a good thing to take embryos or making them in a petri dish.
However, some may disagree, “Dr. Hagiwara felt his family had an economic interest in the new cell line since he had proposed the project and his mother had provided the original cells” (Andrews). Stating that people’s body parts are apart of their personal property and need to be treated as so. That without the persons who donated the body parts there wouldn’t be any tissues or cells to help aid in research anyways. On the other hand, “Dr. Royston disagreed with Dr. Hagiwara, since he and his colleges had invented the procedure and created the parent cell line that made the production of human monoclonal antibodies possible” (Andrews). In the end, there will always be new and incurable diseases like that of my grandfather’s Parkinson’s.
How would you feel if you tried something new that was putting your life in danger? It’s also a fifty percent chance of you making it through the new procedure. Embryonic stem research have not a total success in this world today. First, the treatments may not even work on a person why get your hopes up high. Second, they’re doing this thing called human cloning.
In recent years, several competing viewpoints have emerged about embryonic stem cell research. All of this debate raises an important question, Should embryonic stem cell research be conducted for treatment of present and future diseases? People who believe that an embryo should not be destroyed tend to say that embryonic stem cell research should not be conducted. On the other hand, people who believe that embryonic stem cell research creates means of curing diseases reply that the research should be conducted. Embryonic stem cell research “uses special cells found in three-to-five day old human embryos to seek cures for a host of chronic disease” (PRC).
The disease raises many scientific and ethical questions. When scientists are studying ethics of Xenotransplantation and consider new technology they overlook many basic questions. They also look over the broad question that raises risks and is difficult to evaluate and is very important to consider. The organ transmission also has many risks. Since transplant patients now have to use immunosuppressants, that raises a risk to the environment.
One of the most important arguments to this debate is presented through the scientific lens. Although embryonic stem cells pose enormous potential to treat and cure diseases and conditions, adult stem cells are more effective in treating these conditions. Adult stem cells pose a much lesser risk of forming tumors or not functioning as originally intended (Smith). Adult stem cells are also currently used today, as bone marrow transplants are a form of stem cell treatment (Stem Cells in Use).
yet it’s there.” Stem Cell causes numerous consequences for, it was not reliable and this should undertake deeper studies on the other hand this was the only hope for the person suffering from diseases. We should thank God for the life we have. All of us have a special purpose, it is to live and do God’s will. People were God’s creation all of us were obliged to love one another not to hurt others especially the embryos inside the mother’s
Many people view this as destroying a potential for life to futher scientific research and knowledge. A lot of the opposition to stem cell research comes from the moral belief that human life begins at conception and some see it that destroying an embryo for medical research or even to treat another human is morally the same as killing a human child or adult for research. Many people with these views are strongly religious Roman Catholics or Orthodox