Persuasive Essay On Tattoos In The Workplace

Tattoos being shown in the workplace is an issue for some people, but a person has a right to self-expression and tattoos are becoming more commonly seen. There is no law that prohibits people with tattoos from being employed or hired; therefore, customers should think twice before judging the store employees by their physical appearance. An employee should be allowed to show tattoos because the tattoos have no effect on his or her work performance. Even though we can’t control others perceptions, I believe that we should try and encourage people to not judge others based on their physical appearance. The tattoos that employees have create no effect on their work performance. For example, in the article “Tattoos May Be The Next Great Generational Divide,” Ed Milnes states, “Body art/ modification says nothing about the content of the person.” (“Tattoos May Be”). The quote shows that tattoos on a body do not change the way that he or she thinks or does things. Tattoos are not mind altering like drugs and alcohol. Altogether, even if an employee has tattoos, he or she is still able to complete the job as effectively as those without tattoos. In conclusion, tattoos have no effect on employee’s work performance.

Furthermore, the store employees should not be judged by the customers based on their physical appearance. Within the article

Others should not judge employees based on their physical appearance because it has no relation with how well they can perform their job. Furthermore, tattoos have no effect on how well people perform their job because people with and without tattoos can both complete the job as well as the other. There is no law that states people with tattoos cannot be hired. Thus, employees should be allowed to show their tattoos in the