Jai Advani
1/28/15
American Studies JRP
NSA
One of the most fundamental ideals in America is freedom. Notorious for being one the most liberated countries in the world, everyone was taken by shock when news leaked of the government spying on it’s own citizens. In 2008, Edward Snowden published highly confidential information about the NSA and it’s operations. It was clear his actions left a large scar across the face of America. In a matter of a few days, Snowden’s publishing left many American citizens skeptical of their government. It was clear that the NSA was violating the Fourth Amendment, and basic human rights. It angered citizens that their phone calls and emails were being unjustly read, and for no reason, as the operations has
…show more content…
(Burns) With technology growing, and terrorist plots becoming more frequent, the government decided to switch the NSA’s purpose to become an Internet traffic moderator. As the NSA grew, so did their operations. They began reading into more sensitive information, including private emails of locals, and spying on powerful foreign prime ministers. They began violating some key principles, including the fourth amendment, and basic human rights. This caused a former system administrator of the CIA or Central Intelligence Agency to release classified information that the NSA had gathered. Whistleblower Edward Snowden opened the eyes of millions of Americans to the truth behind the NSA. This sudden release of shocking information created great dismay throughout the world, and even within America it’s self. Internally, America became completely fragmented. Feelings of skepticism and suspicion towards the secrecy of the government became all too common. Many Americans began to feel violated of their rights. They believed that the NSA violated them, and they wanted answers. Frank Kvojak, a resident of Braddock Hills Pittsburgh summed up the issue perfectly. “It’s an invasion of privacy.” (Delano) What he means by this is that the NSA is unreasonably searching through private information of American Citizens, and violating the fourth amendment. The fourth …show more content…
Just this month, we found that the NSA has actually been able to hack into North Koreas computers and access their information. The potential danger that this can cause is almost unfathomable. North Korea, an already very peevish country, could very quickly decide to declare a nuclear war or another form of violence had they chosen too. The hot head of the world is one of the biggest threats, and could have ended in a very troubling way. In addition to North Korea, it is clear that the NSA is also spying on both Russia and China. Although there are already terrifies stopping trade, Russia’s military power is one that cannot be ignored. America would also not want to be locked in to a second wave of the Cold War. In addition to this, if the US were to get into worse relations with China, the US economy could be in grave trouble. About 6% of all of America’s imports come from China, and many large companies utilize the many options that China supplies, such as manufacturing. If the trade were to stop, America’s economy would be very negatively affected. Another reason as to why the NSA should be abolished is because of its extremely close monitoring of the phone company AT&T. To conclude, America is a place built off of freedom and privacy, and the NSA is taking that away from it’s citizens. It is using hard earned tax money on operations that are unconstitutional and useless.
The Patriot Act provides the United States’ law enforcement agencies broad power in both domestic and international surveillance. This act was designed due to the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001. President Bush requested this act to the United States Congress which they passed on October 26, 2001. The act was put in place quickly to stop terrorist within the United States border and be able to apprehend and prosecute the terrorist before they are able to act ("Patriot Act."). The Patriot Act was established to prevent terrorist attacks however; the Patriot Act violates the Constitution making the Act illegal.
The moment that the Twin Towers fell in New York, America became destined for change. In the wake of these attacks, the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 was quickly passed through congress, and signed by then-president, George W. Bush. The act itself gives the FBI and other government agencies the ability to do and use certain methods, many of which are already used by other law enforcement organizations, to help prevent future terrorist attacks. Since then, this piece of legislation has been the center of much debate and controversy. But, there is ample reason to believe that the Patriot Act is needed and effective.
It is impossible to discuss civil liberties and security without talking about 9/11 and the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act was passed almost immediately after 9/11, hugely expanding intelligence agencies ability to investigate potential terrorism. However, critics of the law say that it infringed on the civil liberties of the innocent and did not guarantee proper oversight of law enforcement agencies in their execution and use of these newfound powers. I agree that as war and violence evolve, so must our methods of preventing them. In this digital age preventing such violence means monitoring information channels and being able to respond to leads rapidly and subtly.
The patriot act has in my opion violated the 4th amendment. It has its advantages as far as terrorizim but to normal citzens this is a complete violation of our privacy. bThe late Benjermin Franklin warned us about trading our liberty for sucureity. This act has taken away a lot of our liberties it gives the government way too much power to invade our privacy. They now have unprecedented power to monitor the phone calls, e-mails, without a warrant.
The fourth amendment can be beneficial but, it can also to some U.S. citizens be invasion of privacy. The fourth amendment states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,” some U.S. citizens believe that Law Enforcement, the Government and the NSA are violating the required guidelines of the Fourth Amendment. The NSA is conducted a mass U.S. surveillance not to believe specific individuals may be engaging in terrorist activity, but instead to believe all of us may be engaging in such activity. The government mass surveillance proves that U.S. citizens are considered suspects at all times. With the Patriot Act the NSA has access to
Sixty years ago Ray Bradbury wrote of a futuristic society controlled by its government. A society where books were outlawed and no one cared. He predicted a society that is similar to the society of 2015. He predicted a society that could become reality. Though the worlds of Fahrenheit 451 and 2015 are not the same, they have two similarities: a controlling government and advanced technology.
The Patriot Act and Civil Liberties Civil liberties and freedoms are a fundamental part of America, and the lives of its citizens. Americans believe that they are born with these rights, and that nobody, not even the government who provides these rights, can take them away. Some people are willing to give up some of these freedoms for safety, but many have grown used to them and will not accept any infringement into their lives. The events of 9/11 are a major contributing factor to relinquishing of some of these rights by citizens for the protection of freedom and of the country. They believe that the government knows how to protect them from terrorists, but their rights will not be violated like those of a terrorist.
The FISA and the USA Patriot Act The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and the United and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act (USA Patriot Act) are two actions taken to aid in the efforts against terrorism in the United States. FISA was enacted in 1978 and the U.S. Patriot Act was enacted in 2001 (McAdams III, no date). Both Acts have been and will continue to be critical instruments to combat terrorism. However, the media has exploited these Acts in terms of civil liberties and has demoralized the truth behind them.
US internet use has not declined at all since Edward Snowden’s leakage of the NSA’s operations in 2013. According to Internet Live Stats, US internet usage has increased at about 17.8 million new users per year, mostly for miscellaneous reasons. According to Scott Public Relations, the 3 most popular uses for the internet by far are social networking, gaming, and emailing, constituting 41.9% of the total time Americans spend online. Representatives there is no need to investigate the NSA. They are one of our few feasible defenses against terrorism today, and we cannot afford to lose it.
Most people have the standpoint that because it doesn’t affect them, they shouldn’t really bother with doing anything about it. However, doesn’t the NSA breach our Fourth Amendment rights? The Fourth Amendment guarantees, "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated," but doesn’t mass phone data collection violate that? Legally to search someone you need a warrant but the NSA completely bypasses that.
Snowden, who was a computer systems contractor, worked for the National Security Agency and revealed to the public how the American Government was spying on its own citizens and foreigners. Snowden was committed to the truth which allowed him to reason and understand the difference between what is right and what is legal. Snowden was convinced that the truth requires an individual to do the right thing and not necessarily what is legal. However, doing the right thing could sometimes require an individual to break the law.
A few weeks later, these documents were released by The Guardian, and Edward Snowden was the reliable source. Now, people all over knew that the United States Government was spying on its own people through messages, internet searches, browser history, smart T.V’s and many many more. This case is ongoing, as he seeks asylum in other countries. This newfound information raises the question, is Mr. Snowden a traitor, or did he save us all by “blowing the whistle” to warn us about the unconstitutional collection of our private possessions protected by
On September 11, 2001 terrorists attacked our country. Immediately after these attacks our US congress had to do something. They passed two major pieces of legislature. The first being authorization for use of military force, which gave George W Bush permission to use military force against terrorists, which he used to wage a full war. The second legislature was Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, or the patriot act, which allowed government to use loopholes in the fourth amendment to keep surveillance on their citizens to stop terrorism.
The security is overriding to improve the nation, now day security is increasing to control the terrorism. NSA Surveillance one of the agencies that provide intelligent records to the American government. Although leaking out personal information making the American uncomfortable and people started getting freak out. “I am not trying to bring down the NSA, I am working to improve the NSA. I am still working for the NSA right now.
The main issue in the Snowden controversy is the conflicting rights of private individuals and the US government with regard to the use of telecommunications and the internet. There are ethical issues surrounding this controversy and the most applicable ethical approach for this case is “Ethics by Rights Approach”. As a background, the reason why US government had declared Edward Snowden a traitor is his involvement in the leaking of about 1.7 million confidential US documents, 15,000 Australian intelligence files and 58,000 British intelligence files from the National Security Agency (or NSA) to the public. These confidential information were acquired by the NSA through the PRISM program by collaborating with big internet companies such