Persuasive Essay On The War On Drugs

More positive results can aspire from its legalization and restricting it raises many challenges. From a business standpoint, it is not cost effective to keep it illegal and legalizing marijuana can bring revenue for the government. The amount of money the U.S. spends on criminalizing marijuana users can be used to target the real criminals. Marijuana is not like the other drugs and its use for recreational purposes should be allowed. Marijuana continues to offer us remedies for many ailments and it should not be treated as a drug, rather a medicine or for the pursuit of happiness.

The main issue when it comes to drugs in the United States is the inefficient policies and sentencing laws that have been created. Also, the injustices within these policies pertaining primarily to race. Once the “war on drugs” was claimed the only way the government and law enforcement saw fit to handling this skyrocketing issue was to incarcerate offenders. Although this solution worked for a while, other alternatives needed to be made. However, these alternatives were not made and this left the drug policies, sentencing laws, and injustices at a standstill.

In short, the War on Drugs Legislation not only did not work it amplified the problem. Rather than seeking a solution to the setback and trying to reform drug criminalization, Congress continues to suppress the minorities. Drugs continue to be hard on society and cause both economical and societal problems. In an attempt to stop addiction, Nixon and Regan only fueled it. Addiction needs to be addressed in a therapeutic manner by seeking solutions to the trauma behind the use.

Prohibition was a major event in American history. It showed the weaknesses of morale in the United States, and how much people loved alcohol.

In Harrison Bergeron, Kurt Vonnegut uses the motif: distinct distracting noises to develop the theme: sometimes, everybody being equal isn’t always the best way to keep it. This is so, because the noises represent the physical restraints held on society, when it actually restrains their ability to think for themselves, and be their own people. This also signifies that when people of low intelligence as normal, it drastically reduces the creativity of civilization. These are the reasons that validate why the repeated noises in the story tie to the lack of creativity and quality of life in the timeline.

In addition, the success of Rachels’ argument in the Smith and Jones case partly depends on readers paying no attention to the intentions of the two men. If intentions were to matter in right and wrong, then Smith would be a worse person than Jones, because Smith had committed a physical act of

For instance, drug related advertisement misrepresented the safety and effectiveness of a drug, they suggest things that are not true about the drug in their advertisement. Alcohol is the most commonly used

In conclusion, Poe’s short story is a tale of failed revenge. While Montresor was successful in his use of reverse psychology to avoid obstacles in his plan, he failed at following his own rules. Although someone may take insults directed towards them as a reason to seek revenge, Poe has pointed out that even those people who plot and plan their tactics and have guidelines fail. Ultimately, this story shows that revenge is an unachievable

In brief, the use of drugs has multiple adverse effects, and is highly associated with the status of homelessness among

Just because the sales MIGHT go underground, doesn’t mean that we won’t do anything to improve our current situation. This is just a possibility and even if some people try and access alcohol on the black market, it will only be a minority so we will be able to deal with this issue. Nanny State The negative speaker stated that Australia will become a nanny state if the government continues to be overprotective or interfere with personal decisions. This is incorrect as we are doing this for the common good.

However, heroin is much easier to obtain and less expensive than prescription drugs. Heroin is an extremely dangerous drug for many reasons. First, because it is an illegal drug, it is completely unregulated. Heroin producers often use cutting agents in order to reduce the purity of the drug, and thus make more money. This means that users typically do not know the content or purity of the drug that they are using.

How do you think the average American feels when he pays taxes to the government, just to know that it is going to people who use the money to buy drugs? According to Missouri, Oklahoma, Utah, Mississippi, Kansas, Tennessee, and Arizona only 10% of people receiving welfare are getting caught using drugs, the reason we only catch a small amount is the state government tells the recipients when they are drug testing them. In the technology we have today we can tell if a person is on drugs by three ways one way is urine, another way is blood and the last way is hair. These ways to drug test recipients are all efficient and effective. The most effective way is if you use hair to see if someone is using drugs you can usually tell for about 9 days it also depends on what drug they are using.

Heroin is often used by people who first used prescription drugs. People will become addicted to painkillers because there isn’t much of a stigma. After all, they’re legal. Little to the users know that some of the prescription drugs they’re using are strong enough to treat a cancer

In his mind, all of them buy drugs versus supporting which is actually wrong. Statistics mentioned previously prove that less than 1% of those who receive benefits spend them at bars, strip clubs, sports bars, etc. Russell opposes government benefits, and more so government benefits to support the habits of users. Needless to say, he doesn’t agree with benefits at all, but if he had to have them in effect, he would rather there be drug testing for

Although the intention of the Articles of Confederation was to create a stable government for the 13 colonies, it was sadly designed poorly resulting in an overall ineffective government. The Articles may have been rewarded with some success with respect to western lands, but the overall effect was negative, especially the economic conditions. The economic conditions were primarily the most negative aspect of the Articles of Confederation. The inability to tax settlers caused the federal government to have a serious shortfall in revenue, and the restriction to regulate trade added to the chaos.