This is not a true story, but things like this happen everywhere. A local high school boy named Josh felt the struggle everyday. Josh was struggling to get through his senior year of high school, keep good grades, maintain a steady job, and try to cope with his home life. With graduation only a month away, Josh was certain he wanted to go to culinary school. When he turned in his application he realized he didn’t have an email. Not even thinking, he quickly wrote down his mom’s email and ran out the door. After a eight hour shift at the gas station, he came home to find his mom waiting at the door for him. She said that she had received an application acceptance letter to culinary school. His whole face lit up and he was jumping with …show more content…
There are on average 52,404 deaths in the US each year.This should be eye awakening, but yet the government doesn’t care. Required drug screenings would help lower the use of drugs. Senator David Vitter argues, “Requiring screenings would give addicts a key incentive to seek help so that they can once again be healthy, support their own families, and make positive contributions to our society”(Welfare drug testing 2). If people are truly concerned about getting the help they need, welfare, than they need to be serious enough to get help from drugs. Druggies are getting free food and free everything else but yet are contributing nothing to society. Another reason is that testing people will limit the intake of drugs. Testing people would insure safe environments for children growing up with irresponsible parents (Welfare drug testing 2). Children have no control over what family they are born into or where they live. But if we can do more to protect the future generation of America, then why aren’t we doing everything that we can? We should be protecting the kids that have no voice. Another reason that drug testing should be implemented is because we as hard working citizens are subsidizing people who are then using
Some would argue against drug test, saying it is unfair. This is fair in order to keep our streets safe and our economy
In order to qualify for assistance, people must be: working for low wages or working part-time, unemployed, receiving welfare or other public assistance payments, elderly, homeless, or disabled with low-income (para 3). “The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) sets the rules for SNAP, but individual states run the program. The USDA also provides all the funding for the actual food benefits, while states are responsible for about half the cost of running the program,” (Cancio para 3). Since the state and the federal governments are paying for this program, people should be screened for drugs to prove they are not breaking the federal law about drug use. Illegal drug use is becoming a big issue in today’s society, therefore, most employers have started drug testing before
The underlining pro of mandatory drug testing is it will potentially terminate the families who abuse the system. However, the cons of drug testing are that it will create additional cost to test recipients, violate a person’s privacy, and take money from other programs to pay for the tests. This article is very informative because it provides both the pros and the cons of mandatory drug testing of welfare recipients. This article is useful to my paper because it provides facts without bias and is supported by the National Institute of Mental Health Social Work Research Development Center on Poverty, Risk, and Mental
Because the main basis for drug testing is suspicion, lawmakers are not able to have mandatory drug testing passed. Drug testing is also not passed because individuals are protected by the Fourth
One side to this controversy would be that because of the screenings it would lower and prevent the use of drugs in poverty struck households. Many law officials believe that if a user had to submit to drug test they would get clean because the need for the government assistance would be of greater priority than abusing illegal drugs. Though this may be true in some situations, poor social classes are not the only citizens abusing drugs. It is well known that drugs are abused by people of all social classes. America needs to broaden their view point on this social matter because it effects everyone, not just those who live in poverty.
That is why the government wants to test only those who were already convicted for drugs. This will help save money by not giving everyone on welfare tests because that would be too expensive for the states to afford. The decision was left to the states on whether they want to start the program, and the taxpayers were able to vote on the issue. There was 18 states that voted for the programs and performed the tests. The other 32 that voted not to have drug test felt confident that the money was going to a good cause and had trust in the
Those who feel the drug test should be sent to a rehab. The money they could have gotten to use on drugs could be used on rehab instead. When they have been clean they should have a required amount of time before they can re-apply to make sure they have actually changed. This would help drop drug abuse rates, and create some sense of help for those who want to change, but think there is no way. Once they have been cleared to apply for welfare again not only will they have a remarkable story to tell about how their life did a complete three sixty, but we would have a better feeling knowing those people will be spending their government money
Working individuals are required to perform these drug tests in order to maintain employee standards for their given company (Besonen). Professional sports teams, the military, and many other institutions enforce drug testing to their employees (Besonen). In theory welfare recipients are basically employees of the state government in terms that they receive their funds, so the standards have reasonable regards to back them up
With numbers that small the cost to have the drug tests done costed more than the amount saved by denying them welfare checks. Spending more money on the drug tests is not helping the economy and is a good reason to put them to
You have a choice to support mandatory drug testing or sit back and wait unitl it's to late. Don't wait until the clock cannot be turned back. Allowing the schools to test athletes can and will save lives, I assure you of that. Be the parent that says “a choice I made saved
In Detroit, one random locker search was conducted and the police found six boys smuggling drugs, weapons, and so much more unwanted things. THINK of how many lives that saved and this is why the United States Of America needs to wake up and conduct these locker searches to catch any unwanted items from being used in a bad way. Illegal drugs for anyone are just plain out awful for the human mind and body, so we as a community need to stop the spread of drugs IMMEDIATELY!! Drugs are spreading faster than ever and this must be stopped!! Hiv is caused 10% due to drug injection and by stopping drugs we can stop
Thirty-five percent of Americans recieve help from welfare every day, and if we drug test them that number would suddenly drop. Some individuals claim that drug testing would help individuals by putting them into treatment; however, there are several reasons why drug testing would not help recipients. While drug testing could recognize the individuals who need help, problems would be caused such as impacts on the person, the cost, and other impacts such as on children and poverty levels. I A. First, drug testing will cause problems with the money people are receiving. If the test is positive the recipient will have reduced income and they may not get any income at all (US Department of Health and Human Services 8).
Should Schools Start having drug test more often? People have been saying that kids should have privacy and that students could express his or her discomfort with drug testing (Just Say No). Also they say that it is a law that kids could express their feelings and that they have rights (Just Say No). But I think Drugs in
-www.rob.com Texas, New Jersey and Illinois are ready to have a drug free testing school district.-New York Times There are many positives to drug testing for one “It promotes a feeling of safety” for students and parents about going to school. By applying drug test people will think students are safer as illegal use of drugs will be discouraged and monitored. Drug testing being discouraged will no longer affect students in any way that it will create problems. Safety is valued from parents and school admittistraiters, it helps assure them.
Introduction draft Hi I am Jaimee Burke and these are my partners Bryn Grant and Maddy Wright. Random drug testing needs to be required in every school system in America. Do you want your kids doing drugs on a school campus and getting caught but you can 't prove it? Of course not if your kids or friend is accused by this big statement of doing drugs you want the facts that they have.