Kids should be paid for chores because it helps them with life lessons, value, and last but not least it gives kids a better personality. Children should be paid for chores because chores can teach you important life lessons. In the Article “Should Kids Be Paid For Chores?” it states “studies show that kids who have chores benefit in many ways”. I hate chores when I don’t get paid but when I do get paid I am happy to do them, so if you pay your child/children it motivates them to keep doing chores which can
Next, parents get paid for working, so why shouldn't you? Your parents have a job that they get paid for. Chores is technically working because you have to complete a task, which needs work! Since your parents are working, they get paid. Kids are working hard to finish a task and they should get paid.
Dr. Steve Chen, an educator in Sport Management at Morehead University and author of "Ought to Student-Athletes Get Paid", feels the same way with regards to paying school competitors. Chen trusts that scholastics are the primary motivation behind school. He feels that a school 's essential target is to give understudies a quality training that sets them up to be furnished with the instruments to make due in this present reality. Paying competitors would remove the understudy from understudy competitor and that would crush the reason for a school 's fundamental target. Competitors don 't understand the significance of the instruction they are acquiring while they play their game and that is the reason they ought not get paid, it is not an occupation rather only
Fees are good for school sports because the money that parents pay for their child to play a sport goes towards equipment for that sport. In the text, it said “ A lack of money has forced some schools to charge students and parents for courses and books. Free books and classes are more important than free sports programs. Schools should charge students for sports before they make them pay for books and classes. After all, education should come first at schools.
For example if we get paid we will focus more at school more than we would if we didn 't get paid because most kids love money and if they get paid they will think of school as an actual job. We would be able to do jobs better if we get paid for doing what we are supposed to do like in a real job. Also when we get paid we are able to get more money of course and it will teach us how and what we pay for like setting a budget for how much we are payed. Plus it is able to make us more reliable for jobs.
As we all know, college can be very expensive. With the scholarships and grants, college student-athletes can go to school for free and get their day-to-day needs such as food, housing, clothes, etc. Ackerman and Scotts, purpose is to show that college is a learning experience and with the help of college sports, the student-athletes will have a chance to grow and be successful in life rather than being exploited. However, critics believe that college student-athletes should be paid salary, like professional athletes, because they want people to see the “athletes are the rule, not the expectation” (par 11). They want the audience to think that it’s a rule for student-athletes to go play pro after two years, will no expectation.
The source for this article is “Cash for Grades? Some Schools Give it a Try.” This is a quote from the article: “But while it might reignite kids’ motivation in the short term, we need to reinforce their intrinsic motivation to see lasting results,” according to Teneh Weller. This leads and interprets to kids not being focused enough on their education. Notwithstanding, the kids are just enthusiastic and pending for the money. In the short term, kids may inspire each other to earn good grades.
The source that supports this quote “Cash-for-grade programs may jump start students motivation by providing real world rewards…” would be greatschools.org. But undoubtedly this can be challenged because if kids went to school they would only be coming for the money not the knowledge. In any case, paying kids for good grades is not Clearly, paying students for good grades is a good idea. When considering the choice of giving kids money for good grades, the choice should be definitely obvious because if kids are happy and get good grades what more do they need. This could also allow kids to their parents with bills, and the kid can buy their own things, If this claim is not listened to then teachers, schools, and parents will eventually run out of money making them all bankrupt from paying the students.
Improving all the teachers and administrators, making sure that not only do they teach students, but also help influence their mind set. It would be a priority to add on to teaching methods with lots of positive and motivational speeches towards the students; focusing on what the kids want to be or do in life. There are some school and few teachers out there that focuses on this policy, but not all schools make it their priority. We could then continue as parents. Parents play a big part as well in children 's lives.
Here are two advantages. First, parents can get great public funds to pay for materials, facilities, management time, internet and testing. second, those that mastered a subject or learned a great deal about instructional methods can become paid teachers (“ Brookings”) . Critics charge that there some issues with homeschooling. It is harms students in a way of their education and scholarship.