Another way people should respond to conflict is by being confident and believing in what the they 're trying to do. Winston Churchill said his speech in a positive tone, and had lots of confidence. “You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word. It is victory” (Churchill P11).
For example, he shared his honest opinion regarding the government, clearly stating the essence of a general government and how to it can be well administered if people put aside their selfish views and overlook their personal interests. He also spoke thoughtfully when he mentioned that the only way a government can gain power is through others’ unanimity, saying that “Much of the strength and efficiency of any government depends on the general opinion of the goodness of that government, as well as of the wisdom and integrity of its governors.” Moreover, Benjamin has also taken the advantage of his past experiences, reminding the listeners of his age and the authorities he has “for, having lived long,”. He shared his struggles with corruption and how he learned that everyone makes mistakes, including himself. Additionally, He alluded to to the possible negativities that may result from accepting the Constitution, saying “I agree to this Constitution, with all its faults.”, which proves that he is aware that nothing is perfect, but together, they can integrate to form a stronger nation. Therefore, he called for a salutary Constitution, where integrity and consideration take over the despotic behaviors of those in
It all started when he rose to the occasion to represent the Virginia House of Burgesses. He later then became more popularized when delivering his “liberty of death” speech. So therefore Patrick Henry is the most confident speaker because of his ability to use pathos and persuade the colonists and revolutionaries. Patrick henry is the most confident when delivering his speeches to the colonists by getting his main point across
Macduff came out victorious. After Macbeth was finished, I was crowned King and was able to bring back royalty to my family. Being the king isn’t the easiest task to have. You have to make sure that the village is in order, that everybody is doing their part, and that everybody is safe. At this moment, it may be rough to be the king after the previous attack, but I believe I will gain the trust of my people and we can move forward into the right direction.
(8)” By saying this, Ragen establishes a bit of a general truth that essentially encourages his audience that they should not take this tragedy as a loss, but instead take it as a lesson learned. Since the Challenger crew were able to pursue their mission with courage, it is now the future generation’s turn to undertake where they have left off, and finish where they started. Overall, Ronald Reagan took advantage of his enormous platform to give a national eulogy in order to alleviate the pain caused by the loss of the Challenger seven. Raegen pursues his delivery with the use of rhetorical devices such as Pathos and Parataxis in order to appeal to his audience’s emotions while at the
Obama used anaphoras in his speech to persuade his audience that “we” are in this together. Furthermore, President Obama’s first inaugural speech contained patriotism, allusions, and anaphoras to appeal to the effect of pathos. His diction helps to persuade his audience that he is understanding and emotionally connected to the situation that America has been in and the importance of sticking to the ideas that our founding fathers have implemented thus far in America’s
Patrick Henry was a successful leader during the American Revolution. Also he was a governor. Henry gave many effective speeches during his lifetime. The speech that was most effective was the Speech in the Virginia Convention given on March 23, 1775. This speech used great examples of literary terms such as ethos, pathos, and logos to help make the speech more effective.
Theodore Roosevelt’s speech “National Duties” calls for nationalism and unity, as it says that each individual must work hard and that individuals must work together. Furthermore, it works to motivate our nation by using two ideas – what a nation may leave behind and how a nation should conduct itself. The speech itself, although given while he was Vice President, accurately describes what his actions as president were, whether it be regarding nationalism, personal matters, or foreign diplomacy. His ideology of how a nation should act, seen in the phrase “speaking softly and carrying a big stick” works to motivate many, including our current military, because it focuses on civility backed with power. This idea of leadership style, combined with looking at what Theodore Roosevelt did during his presidency, is very similar to Trump’s way of leading our nation, although they came into office with different political experience.
Obviously he is someone of importance with a good education, moral values, and credible if he is speaking in Washington D.C. in the White House to the President of the United States. This will influence listeners/readers right off the bat knowing he has credible knowledge if he is speaking to government officials directly whom most have a high level of respect for, they will be more willing knowing this. He is also a Holocaust survivor which may also grasps more attention. Intrinsic ethos is used greatly in this speech through the word choice he makes to create a powerful tone. He is very skilled in the way he uses his language choice and terminology.
Thomas Paine’s The Crisis does an excellent job of exemplifying the usage of the colonist’s feelings prominently in the content. One of Paine’s purposes in writing such a pamphlet is to convince the colonial Americans that they must not be cowardly by supporting British rule. Throughout his pamphlet, this ideal is displayed in an extremely pronounced manner, with a considerable example in the first paragraph: “The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will… shrink from the service of this country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of every man and woman.” (Paine 331). He attempts to instill a sense of self realization and motivation in those who have not joined with the revolutionaries, to receive respect and admiration by doing so. To finish out, Paine tries to identify with the reader in the middle of his pamphlet, saying that he “once felt all that kind of anger… against the mean principles that are held by the tories,” (Paine 334).