It is hard to understand why an animal should be used to conduct research which is aimed at finding medicine for the human disease (Singer) . Singer notes that majority of human beings believe that other species are there to make human life comfortable and therefore it is inevitable to use nonhuman to please human. Sussex university philosophers believe that it is through liberty, fraternity, and equality that human will change their attitudes towards animals and consider mistreatment of the animal as a practice which should not happen (Singer). By classifying animal exploitation as illegal, it will be possible to attract the
They have a basic moral right to respectful treatment (Regan, 1985). Some scientist uses animals without any permission to the animal welfare. Animals are not humans so people should not use them for scientific testing to make products that are not safe. Mice are the most used animal for scientific testing. Mankind is constructing laws for animals’ right, but because of having an inhumane scientist, they violate the rules and make their experiments.
Using large number of animals is mainly meant to find treatments and cure for certain diseases. Moreover, animals are used to develop medical treatments, check the safety of any products before people can use it and in science education. Therefore, without using animals in the medical and scientific studies the products and all the medicine would be based on theory only. Furthermore, people will use something that may cause serious damages to them. Animal testing has provided many
It’s often used to test products as a safety precaution before they are released to the public. Although it can be useful to know the side effects of something before trying it on humans, we don’t consider the effects it can have on the animals, which are often extremely harmful and cruel. Scientists have become progressive in creating alternative methods to these experiments. Now, animal testing is nearly unnecessary because there are alternatives which are more efficient and harmless. The rights of animals is a topic that comes up frequently, but people often turn their cheek the other way when it comes to their possessions being a product of cruelty.
Even with all of the outcry, there is a large group of people that see animal experimentation as a necessary evil. Many see it as “ total elimination of animal testing will significantly set back the development of essential medical devices, medicines, and treatment” (Hajar 7). Animal testing is a necessary evil that has been extremely beneficial to humans and is crucial to the advancement of medicine in the
In my opinion, having animal testing is a great way to test out new medications for different diseases before they are tried on humans, but then again I don’t feel like everything about animal testing is a good thing. For example, a lot of animals die on a daily basis from all the testing done on them. Also, animals can’t tell you if something is wrong, nor is any of this testing used for them. I understand certain points to both sides of testing on animals the only thing is you really have to look into it to understand what really is going
Collier does not start her article by grabbing the reader 's attention, but she soon gets straight to the main idea. Collier mentions how animal experimentation is necessary and beneficial to human beings. Collier states, “This is an important part of animal research because one of the big limitations in human neuroscience and human psychology is that yes, we can image the brain, but we can 't see it at a microscopic level”(Collier 40). The reader will begin to understand how animal research is extremely important when examining human organs. Collier also states, “Rodent brains are made of the same mechanisms as human brains — the same kind of cells, the same kind of neurotransmitters or chemicals”(Collier 40), to give the readers more crucial evidence as to why animal research is necessary.
Animal experiments are conducted to test whether the manufactured drugs, that are going to be put out in the market, are safe. They are also conducted as research purposes, like discovering cures for untreatable diseases. However, animal testing has been called in to question because its cruelty and lack of promised results. Is it possible to assume animal testing has become unnecessary? First of all, the conduction of animal experimentation can be easily rejected because of the immorality and cruelty that comes with it.
Which means that most of the animals used in scientific testing are being abused for no apparent reason. Due to this realization, it seems ridiculous to continue to harm, expose to danger, and mistreat animals all in the name of science. Ethics are described as the moral principles that guide the way people behave. Ethical issues range from child labor to discrimination to animal testing. Science has put regulations and restrictions against the
Giving animals basic human rights is also not a good idea because giving animals human rights would mean not being able to test on animals. Who then will there be to test on. It would be inhumane to test medicines on a human and risk losing a Human 's life rather than losing a animals life. By testing on apes and other animals scientist have found many new cures for a lot of diseases. Taking apes and animals out of labs what would we have