Jacquelyn Sporer Title Have you heard about the misconceptions of farrowing crates? Many people think that farrowing crates are inhumane, but those people don’t know the harm a sow can cause her babies. Farrowing crates are used for penning sows away from their piglets so they won’t sit on them or smother them (Accidently, of course). They have an area for the sow and for the piglets. Farrowing crates are thought to be inhumane, but in this speech I will cover all the ways that they aren’t. Farrowing Crates are a very popular topic with many animal right groups. They claim that farrowing crates keep the sow in a much too small pen that restricts movement. It has been described as a “Torture Device.” According to an animal rights group, farrowing crates are used to take up less space so the farm can have more pigs, which provides more profit. They also say that since the sow is in this crate, she is not able to have contact with her babies. According to Tom Philpott, sows are forced into these crates during their entire pregnancy where it is so small they cannot even lie down. He also says that they are forced to sit in their own urine and feces. Philpott states in an article that …show more content…
They provide a cooler area for the sow and a warmer area for the young pigs. The flooring is designed to stay dry to reduce the spread of diseases. Farrowing crates can reduce aggressive behaviors and more precise feeding management. Even though farrowing crates are very useful and helpful, I can personally see why some think that they are inhumane. Most animal rights groups over exaggerate the facts of farrowing crates. They make up things to try to get people to believe their theories. Farrowing crates are a great thing to farmers and they should continue to be used. Farrowing crates are thought be inhumane, but in this speech I covered the reasons why they are
He describes in great detail all the different positions on the line that strips the cows of their dignity. He describes how the “de-animalization” (70) of the cow is concealed from not only the consumer but also from the workers on the production line. Each position has a specific job whether it is “an ear tag recorder” who keeps tracks of every cow by number and color, or the “lower belly ripper,” which Pachirtat described in Appendix A as a position on the line that “uses hand knife hook to open lower half of pattern in hide, picking up where upper belly ripper left off.” (260) Each job on the line is kept hidden from the next and is ultimately hidden from outside
Jackie also explains that just about any breed can be used for either a family milk cow or a beef cow. Before buying a calf everything should be set up for it so when it is brought home it is a quick transition to the new life. Housing a calf is very important; there must be a dry place for the calf to stay because dampness is the enemy to calves Jackie explains. She also says a calf can be raised in a ten by ten stall with a fenced in area outside for it to play and get exercise. A bottle with a nipple, the facilities being used, and milk replacer must be ready for the calf.
They’re also making the animals work long hours. The Pigs explain the action taken towards Boxer as an example of what they will do to all the animals when they get old and tired.
Following Michael Pollan’s view in his book, The Omnivore’s Dilemma, he covers the realm of concentrated animal feedlot operations (COFAs) in his extensive spiel about the overarching concept of corn in our society. He discusses his purchased steer, number 534, as he accompanies its journey through the system. In the beginning 534 enjoyed his life on a green pasture with his mother for six months, until he became strong and bulky enough to get a change of scenery. He was then transferred to a lovely place called a backgrounding pen; where 534 learned to live in a pen, eat from a trough, and to consume a new diet. Pollan’s observational study lead him to find many complications regarding COFAs and their effect on the environment.
Puppies are animals that are raised and loved by many people across the world. Of course, any dog owner would be sympathetic to the torturing of these puppies for gustatory pleasure. Farm animals are raised for the sole purpose of profit and value. Norcross’s argument does not have any validity, and therefore, does not contain enough evidence to support it.
Among the thousands of mills all over the United States of America, roughly two million pupies are born inside every year. A little more than a third never see daylight muchless step foot on grass. Many of these short, innocent lives begin and end here. The conditions of the crates the babies, along with their mothers, are kept in are either wire or wood. Never cleaned, only touched when removing the dead or sold animals.
Did you know that in factory farms, the majority of chickens, turkeys, and ducks have their beaks removed to prevent cannibalism? What about that egg-laying hens are sometimes starved up to 14 days, exposed to different light patterns, and not given water to shock their bodies into molting? Many people live their lives not knowing of the cruelties that occur in a factory farm. Last year I had an older friend that worked at a factory farm specifically for pigs. One day when I was visiting him, I asked how he liked his job that he had recently gotten hired on to.
In fact, the animals are often stored in small cages or spaces with barley any room to move, many will catch a disease from their poor quality of living. Social interaction is crucial because the animals become tired of the same environment, this leads to aggression. To control the aggression, animals are often pumped with drugs. Often, if an animal is sick there will be no veterinary help because of the high cost that is required, as a result, cattle have died from dehydration or other reasons regarding the lack of care. Because the animals are seen as a profit they are bred in a way that is convenient for the slaughterhouse.
Although the thought of treating animals humanely is an agreeable argument to side by, Costello’s approach to the subject was incorrect. In my opinion, she fails to use fitting analogies to explain why factory
Alastair Norcross takes the position in the animal rights argument that torturing animals for their use is unacceptable. He asks to consider a case where a man, Fred, lost his ability to enjoy chocolate because he lost the ability to produce Cocoamone. Fred’s doctor tells him that a recent study shows that, when puppies are tortured and then brutally killed, they produce cocoamone that Fred can then harvest. So Fred sets up his basement where he can torture puppies and then slaughter them in order to taste chocolate again. Norcross claims that this is obviously wrong and draws a correlation between Fred’s case and the situation where we cause chickens to suffer in order to mass produce their meat.
This kind of goes along with the whole idea that there is to many pigs in small spaces.
They were built in the United States and Canada during the 1960’s and 1970’s. When these facilities were built, there was little understanding of animal behaviors and a lack of compassion for their suffering. Over the years, inventors and animal activists such as Temple Grandin have spoken up for these animals and explained why how they are treated is so important. She considered one of the world’s few designers for livestock handling equipment and facilities (Animal Handling Inventions,
Introduction: Genetically modified organisms can be defined as organisms in which the DNA has been changed in a way that does not occur naturally by any reproduction procedure. The enviropig is just one of many organisms that they did experiments on to modify it to have specific (needed) outcomes. The reason for genetic modification is to be able to change a product or organism so that it deliver desirable traits. The enviropig was created to solve the problem of pigs not being able to absorb enough phosphorous from their diet, which then in its turn contributes to the larger factor of pollution.
They say that is for their benefit, but really that they are selfish and they want the food and drink for themselves. Without it, they would not fulfill their duties. On page 52, the author states, “Do you know what would happen if we pigs failed in our duty? Jones would come back!” The animals are being put in the position is which they fear the one that abused they came back.
Did you know that many cows in factory farms die before their 5th birthday? (Leader, Jessica. " 9 Facts About Factory Farming That Will Break Your Heart (GRAPHIC PHOTOS). " The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 17 Mar. 2014.