1) Have you defined the problem accurately? – The article “With Driverless Cars, a Safety Dilemma Arises” by Amy Dockser Marcus primarily focuses on this question. The article discusses research around the question – would you buy a driverless car that protects you first or pedestrians? Amy Dockser Marcus does an excellent job of using facts and not loyalties to define the dilemma. She starts by quoting a survey that found 76% of 182 respondents stated it would be better for a driverless car to be programmed to sacrifice the driver at the benefit of saving 10 pedestrians.
The car insurance is one of the annual fixed expenses associated with owning a vehicle. It is a mandatory product, but the truth is that mandatory minimum coverages are not too many. Driving without car insurance is subject to punishment, and also if we have a safe and suffer a collision, we get peace of mind. Before buying a car insurance, it is best to compare few possible safer, better.
My first piece of advice is to get into the habit of preparing to fight a ticket. If you’re going to have any hope of fighting your speeding ticket, then, you need to know as much about the incident as any cop. If you’ve been driving for a few years, then, it can be pretty easy to let your thoughts wander from the here and now. If and when you get stopped, you need to be very aware of everything that happens before, during, and after you’re pulled over. Start developing some habits to
This is a Quote by Randy Pausch “It’s not the cards you are dealt but it’s the game you play.” This quote mean’s that you try to make the best at whatever life throw at you. You will never know what can happen in life. Say for instant a car that you about to buy at a dealership break’s down when you doing a test drive on the car.
Fischer who was interviewed at the New York International Auto Show tells CNN Money Watch, that by looking towards new crash mitigation technology it will worn the driver if an accident is about to occur. Moreover, it will automatically hit the breaks for the driver if there is something impending. This not only explains the ways in which travelling would become safer by depending on technology, it also shows that these technological advances could go on to save lives. Not only does research show that humans are more accident prone, but when using driverless cars not only would less accidents occurs it could also lead to the prevention of accidents, for humans, on
This broken glass can pose safety risk in that case it is better to go for car replacement which will be safer and can be covered under the standard car insurance policy. It is always safe to have car glass replacement because you will not have the fear of what will happen the next moment when the car takes a jerk and with it the glass may break into piece and hurt the people who are sitting in the car. So to avoid such problems it would be safer to go for replacement then get the glass repaired temporarily. There are quite many services available for car glass repair as well as car glass replacement which can set it right within 24 hours. So why take risk in making some temporary repairs when the replacement can be made immediately without any tension.
The money will not be placed in the wrong hands. From reading an article called The Anti-Tobacco Tax Doctor Is In by Liam Dillon is says that “The governor and Legislature would decide how that money gets spent every year, but it would most likely go toward paying doctors and insurance companies for existing patient-treatment programs.” So no matter what there is no way that the money will be used for someone 's
The higher the speed limit, the more likely the crash will be severe. There happens to be proven research that shows that speed has little effect on how fast people drive. “ People are capable of finding a good speed without the following the speed limit signs” (Boyles). Sometimes the driver gets distracted and loses his or her focus on the road. Speeding and being distracted, even by the smallest things, can cause an accident or even life threatening injures.
According to the argument, the author claims that the Prunty County should emulate Butler County to improve the conditions of the road to reduce the traffic addident rate. Unfortunately, the author has to further the argument with addithional evidence before she can legitimately come to the conclusion. To begin with, although the number of accidents has not decreased, it doesn 't necessarily mean that to lower the speed limitation from 55 to 45 miles per hour is of no use at all. Clearly, the author assumes that the number of accidents is equal to the degree of highway safety. However, how severe are these accidents are not mentioned.
Parents can regulate gas money and driving restrictions to encourage good habits. Lawmakers should not raise the minimum driving age. Doing so would cause travel issues among families. Teens have outside obligations that require driving to various locations. Parents need to be able to supervise young drivers to influence positive future driving behaviors.