Schools are still cutting out electives and still can’t afford some of the basic things that students should have in their learning environment. Lynda Barry in her article The Sanctuary of School talks about how for some kids their school is their safe haven. She shows how valuable extracurricular activities and after school programs are when she says,” Before and after school programs are cut and we are told that public school are not made for baby-sitting children. If parents are neglectful temporarily or permanently, for whatever reason, it’s certainly sad, but their unlucky children must fend for themselves. (Barry 724-725) There are children in our communities that depend on the school to keep them safe and to offer protection when their parents are unable to do that but the schools are
Another reason students should not wear uniform is because students parents might struggle for paying for uniform and and the kids might feel uncomfortable wearing uniform. From synonym.com by Matt Rauscher... “Children outgrow uniforms quickly, and their uniforms may often get stained or torn. Replacement costs begin to add
One reason that having year round school can affect families is by not having much time with them. Quality family time is important to the emotional and developmental well being of a child. Not having a summer break can make it difficult to schedule meaningful family time (Kalil). This analyzes that not having summer can affect relationships with families because they do not get to spend much time together for a long period of time. Another reason why year round school can affect families is if one kid goes to a different school that has year round school and the other goes to a normal school.
If all the students are worried about is getting good grades to get those scholarships, then they are in school for the wrong reason. I believe that the point of going to school is to learn material not to take the easy route to satisfy yourself by getting good grades. I would rather fail something and learn from it, than pass with flying colors and not learn anything at all just because I wanted the money. Yes there is more of a reward for getting good grades rather than learning the material but what are you really getting out of it if you are not learning anything. Rags to riches, which means you might be the rag and at the bottom while you are in school, but if you learn something in school and work hard you while eventually be on the rich side of things.
Menlo Park Academy is a chaotic school with no order. The board is made of parents who only want the best for their child. Parents practically run the school and the only students who get the advanced classes are students of parents who fight the school for their child, even if other students are qualified. The school is run by parents, it 's completely chaotic. Menlo Park Academy simply takes the good, gifted from public schools, and hurts the public school system.
I believe that year round schooling is bad.My reasons for that arethat year round schooling would cost schools to much money,the quality of instruction is more importantthe time spent in school,and for some kids it’s hard to pay eattention for long periods of time. I think that my reasons are reasonable.Because it already takes a good amount of money for schools to go for nine months of school.Making school all year round would make it hard for schools to pay for supplies,buses,salaries,heating,and air conditioning.Also research shows that longer school doesn’t increase the quality of how much kids are learning very much.Another thing is kids with ADHD can’t pay attention for long periods of time,and kids that are very active need to get fresh
Like I said before, a parent might feel responsible that their children is not going to college and feel like it's unacceptable and work maybe 2 jobs to get the money. This is not healthy as it create stress and discomfort in the family. Secondly, the student can stop worrying about how to get extra education. This is probably the most important because the student can start preparing and
Amanda Ripley demonstrates the consequences for having school sports in “The Case Against High School Sports” because schools are spending too much money on their sports and can be solved. The author brings to the reader’s eye that sports cost way too much money and should be cut. I think Ripley is wrong because even though it cost a lot of money, they should still keep the sports. If they cut the sports, then it’s not fair to the students that are graduating because they could of had a chance to get a scholarship. If the schools cut the sports, then there is no chance for the students.
I don’t regret that I dint take the ACT over but I wish I had. Simply because now I don’t have a scholarship, not having that means I have to take out student loans, and doing that means I have to pay it back once I finish school. The lesson learned from the ACT is, its ok, don’t let it define who you are as a student. That’s what I did and it hindered me from taking it again, I was scared
The schools would also have more money if they stopped trying to keep the grass all green and pretty because it kills their educational funds (Ripley 10). As the teachers go along with trips they need to get substitutes to back them up, and the schools need to pay for hotels and meals along the road (Ripley). The article is trying to say that the sports put a big hole in the schools budget and paychecks to pay for their athletics. As we can tell, the data is clear, that schools should stop sports because they cost too much for all the bills and new things that make the team look bigger and maybe even better. As the community can tell, money is a big issue for schools today, another huge problem is the academic needs of the schools and students.
Although, these families would take full advantage of EBT and housing when all they should do is stop having more children until they can support themselves without having anyone assist them or government provided aid. It is not fair to have those who work so hard to have possession on what they work hard to do so that soon having to wait on the time to pay for the large amount of currency they must pay for being on the higher income
Should school be year round with more breaks to improve education? My opinion is no, I think it’s a bad idea to have school year round. Having year round would have a negative impact on the students, they wouldn’t be able to spend as much time with family, and no time for themselves. Having school year round would have a negative impact on the students. Students stress level would be higher from all the constant work they would have to do, with no breaks would be confused.
Get taken out for doing something that shouldn’t do. Don’t be stopped and get token out of school and waste all the parents’ money they’re going to be mad at just try to not do something you shouldn’t do and regret. Grades are a big dill got to keep up with the grades don’t let the grades down keep them up. When the give more homework do it don’t sit and don’t do what post to do get it done over with and out of the way finish it so I will
Student athletes should not be paid for their athletic performance because it would result in the loss of amateur sports. The loss of money in schools and that most student athletes already have financial aid. Paying athletes will result in the loss in amature sports, if they want to get paid like pros they should have to live part of the pro life. Such as the fear of being cut for poor performance, the ability to be traded or being taxed from the money they make. College is also for learning and earning a degree not for playing sports and being paid, that is why professional sports are in place.