Persuasive Speech: Yann Martel's 'Life Of Pi'

However, many modern zoos around the world have introduced animal shows, petting and feeding sessions to attract more visitors in order to earn more money. This leads to many concerns from the public on the physical and mental impacts of captivity on the wild animals. This essay examines the advantages and disadvantages of zoos to lead us to a possible conclusion whether it is ethical to place animals in captivity. We will also examine if zoos have the best possible facilities to keep animals in captivity. Body One of the advantages of having zoos, is to provide protection to some animals that are endangered.

Animal rights activists argue that it is inhumane to house animals in inadequate habitats and are upset that many species that aren’t considered endangered are being held in zoos around the world. Zoo advocates argue for the conservation and research of endangered species, and thoroughly work to benefit different species and keep them healthy. Both arguments base their reasoning off of varying ideas, animals rights activists address the physical downfalls of animals in captivity, how it is nearly impossible to perfectly recreate an animals natural habitat, and the abuse of animals in captivity. Zoo advocates argue that the conservation and research of endangered species is necessary to keep them from extinction, they fight for humane treatment of animals around the world and work hard to show the real problem in today’s environment. Endearing Emotions As you can imagine, stories of animal abuse and the destruction of natural habitats around the world cultivate a strong emotional foundation that drives many people’s

They are wild predators and threatening to some. But we should also understand why some opt to adopt them despite understanding its dangers. By implementing a law, we can make sure owners are responsible for it and thus provide adequate care for their own pets. We can make sure neighbors feel comfortable and accept these “special” friends. Last but not the least, we can make sure the animal is safe and free from suffocating cages and insufficient food.

All in all, the sources have different and similar ways in supporting that the zoo's role is to protect animals. Although the sources have similar evidence, they still have different ways. In “The Zoos Go Wild” instead of the author talking about being safe and protected there was a different idea. According to the Nirgiotis “Willie’s keepers wanted him to be happy” (Nirgiotis, pg. 3).

Zoos have always been something that families love and kids look forward to going to. Kids learn about the animals and the habitats and enjoy the entertainment. It is a great experience for people, but not for the animals. Zoos are downright cruel to Animals. Animals our forced to live in an unreal stressful, and boring conditions.

But some zoos again are preserving and studying endangered species in captivity to save endangered species in the wild. For example the San Diego Zoo researchers are working to preserve living cell samples from animals. Hoping that one day they will have the technology to turn cells into full animals, which could allow scientists to restore endangered species. So zoos have had the choice how to save endangered species, ones what are quicker or ones what are not possible to do right now. No one is born to be prisoner.

One of the main arguments for zoos and other animal sightseeing places is the educational benefits and support for wild animals. Zoos usually have speakers who talk about the animals and in better cases about how to help endangered animals avoid extinction. I have witnessed one of these talks first hand at my local zoo. A few times a day they have a speaker come to the tiger enclosure and list facts and interesting characteristics of tigers. This can be beneficial, but does not need an animal to be captive.

Lastly, one big claim is that zoos help conservation of animals (Borrel n.p). If zoos were really concerned, they would try to conserve animals in their natural habitat, “the only way to realistically stop extinction is to preserve the world’s habitat and ecosystems,” (Zoos n.p). While zoos may help a bit, there are better ways to help and learn from

Allowing zoos to continue on with what they do can allow them to prevent endangered species from going extinct, have animals receive proper care from experts, and allow people to educate themselves with the wildlife around them, and learn more about what the world really does hold. First things first, one of the most vital things a zoo can do to help animals is to rescue animals from extinction. For example, in the first article, “The Impact of Animal Protection,” it states that “These programs have helped bring several animals - black-footed ferrets, California condors, red wolves, golden lion tamarins, and others - back from near extinction over the last 30 years,” It also states that “People cannot build or hunt in those areas, and rangers are there to watch over the animals,” This clearly supports the fact that saving animals through inhabiting them in zoos is highly efficient, and that the animals there are safe. Despite zoos “entrapping” animals in their own

This definitely helped a lot, but still doesn’t fix the problem with predators. Predators are like robbers of their prey’s life. Once one is caught, predators never let go. While some may argue that being in a zoo will affect an animal’s hunting skills, it’s not always the best plan to let endangered animals free in the wild. It stands to reason that society should continue keeping our animals safe from danger in