Standing Up In 12 Angry Men
The story of 12 Angry Men is a strong persuasive story, about todays biggest struggle between wrong and right. Its smart, creative and It shows the importance of standing up, and not being pressured into doing what others are. Jury 9 and 3, I feel made the most impact on the plot, and the theme of the story. Both characters where interesting through out the story.
Jury 3 was a major contributor to the plot of the story, and constantly added outrage. He regularly brought unnecessary remarks and accusations to the jury room. His remarks and comments usually didn 't pursued the other 11 jury’s, but the criticism sure made things more hectic and frustrating. Jury 3 was for sure the antagonist in the story, with out him there wouldn 't of been
…show more content…
He brought themes like: hope and precaution to the story. He stood up, and gave jury 8 a chance, when no one else would listen to him. He wasn 't as important as jury 3 in themes of the story, but he did change the theme when he chose not guilty in the second ballet. I think he brought the theme of caring, to the story. Even though it was a little theme, he did care for what jury 8 had to say, and he also cared for the 19 year old boy with a death penalty aging above his chest. He had no judgement, and was willing to listen and save a life when no one else would. Although he wasn 't super important in the themes, he was important in the non-guilty plead they ended up with in the end of the story.
In conclusion, both Jury 3 and 9 where signifiant in the story 12 Angry Men. They both brought signifiant themes and plots to the story, some more important then others but each significant in its own way. Without jury 3, there wouldn 't of been a big enough conflict for the story to be interesting. Without jury 9, there may not of been hope for the boy to live, with out his non-guilty vote the boy might of died. Thanks to both characters, the story was very interesting and its a story people will read for years to come, and I can guarantee
Juror 8 In 'Twelve Angry Men' By Reginald Rose
683 Words | 3 PagesHow It All Began As the jurors step into the room, all 12 minds are set on the idea that without a doubt, the man in question has killed his father; all except one. More follow suit as the original mastermind stands up to the majority, and that majority soon becomes a minority. All endings do start with a beginning though, and that beginning is Juror Eight, who steps up to the challenge of becoming a justice seeker, and soon, others follow. In “Twelve Angry Men”, a play formed by Reginald Rose, Juror Eight is our shining protagonist, looking only to create fairness in the court of law.
The Leading Role Of The Play In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men
718 Words | 3 PagesIntroduction: “Twelve Angry Men” a play in jury room in The United States in 50’s written by Reginald Rose is a story about an eighteen year boy from the ghetto who is on trial for the murder of his abusive father. A jury of twelve men is locked in the deliberation room to choose the fate of the young boy. If all facts are against the boy and he is considered guilty they will send him to die in the electric chair. This play turned into a movie in 1957 the producer was Henry Fonda he played the lead role. Stakeholders of the movie: The Judge and the 12 Jurors are the stakeholders of the movie these people are from same country having different backgrounds.
Twelve Angry Men By Reginald Rose: Character Analysis
492 Words | 2 PagesOne person can make a difference in a situation. Although we all hate to be the odd ball, sometimes it’s good to show what we really think. In the play Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose demonstrates how the power of an individual in society can make a difference in someone’s life, which is represented though juror number eight. There would be no play without juror number eight. He was the one to make everyone think differently, to think twice about the boy.
Character Differences In 12 Angry Men
1133 Words | 5 PagesAlthough 3 does change his mind in the end, he is the last to change so he is the leader for the guilty side. In the end, the reader can look at figure 1. and take away the fact that juror 8 is the main character, and that jurors 3 and 8 causes the main conflict in the
12 Angry Men Justice Analysis
633 Words | 3 PagesJurors for Justice? What if the justice system wasn’t as unbiased as you thought? Within the play Twelve Angry Men the justice system supposedly chose 12 men to give a fair verdict for a boy that supposedly murdered his own father but, instead some jurors have other plans, bias backgrounds, or predetermined decisions. One way Twelve Angry Men shows an unfair trial is the backgrounds of the jurors.
Duty In 12 Angry Men
1052 Words | 5 PagesA murderer!! He’s got to die! Stay with me!” Those sentences are said before the final vote, which is eleven vote not guilty, and one votes guilty after they test all evidence. Those sentences also show that Juror Three is very emotional because the boy makes him remember the bad relationship between his kid and him.
Ethos, Pathos, Pathos And Logos In 12 Angry Men
1964 Words | 8 PagesAfter watching 12 Angry Men, I was very inspired by juror 8 ' argument techniques. His eye contact, body language, tone, the persuasive techniques he used like induction, pathos, ethos and logos should be studied and analyzed in a very detailed, precise way. These factors were strong enough to change 11 angry men 's mind and to vote not guilty, even juror 3 who is the most stubborn. 12 Angry Men 's message toward individuals and the society as a whole is to think once and twice before judging, how to have a successful, convincing argument and most importantly, it encourage everyone to stand up for your opinion. One of the reasons why everyone should speak up is sometimes other people are thinking the same way, but they are not brave enough to express their opinion.
Loyalty And Jurors In Twelve Angry Men
311 Words | 2 PagesTwelve Angry Men was about a group of jurors struggle to come with a verdict for a murder case. In the beginning, all but one tenacious juror believed that the eighteen year old boy was guilty of murdering his father. The main problem of the story was that the jurors verdict had to be unanimous. Through the process of trying to get each other to change positions, the jurors face many arguments and disagreements. The jurors personalities clash multiple times because each one has a different view on things and are adamant in their decisions.
Leadership In 12 Angry Men
630 Words | 3 PagesJuror #3 mixed his personal conflicts with his son running away from home to the young man accused of hurting his father. His assumption was that young men who don't get along with their fathers might go as far as to kill him. Which is a very informal practice in a small group setting. Another incident of a informal role is to not provide the evidence first hand how can a room full of jurors decide the fate of somebody when they don't have precise evidence to incriminate him. Other jurors based the fact that the accused lived in a slum and that slum residents are delinquents by nature.
Importance Of Juror In 12 Angry Men
929 Words | 4 PagesThe jurors have to sort “facts from fancy” and come to an unanimous decision meaning they all have to vote guilty or not guilty. The juror I am going to discuss is the 8th juror, he was the only person to vote not guilty. I will discuss his character, how he effects the course of justice and how does he illustrate the theme of the play. I believe that the 8th juror is the most interesting juror of the twelve because in a way he is the perfect juror and represents the boy’s good luck. Number 8 plays a very important role in the play because he is the one juror that voted not guilty and stood up to the others, in his own words: “It’s not easy for me to raise my hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it first”.
12 Angry Men Analysis
814 Words | 4 Pages‘Twelve Angry Men’ written by Reginald Rose, is based on the story of a jury who have to come together to determine the fate of a young boy accused to have murdered his own father. Initially, eleven of the jurors vote not guilty with one of the juror being uncertain of the evidence put before them. As the men argue over the different pieces of evidence, the insanity begins to make sense and the decision becomes clearer as they vote several other times. Rose creates drama and tension in the jury room, clearly exploring through the many issues of prejudice, integrity and compassion, in gaining true justice towards the accused victim. These aspects have been revealed through three character who are Juror 10, Juror 8 and Juror 3.
Decision Making In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men
911 Words | 4 PagesThrough the play, ‘Twelve Angry Men’ established in 1957, the playwright, Reginald Rose signifies the importance of both rational attitude and emotions when making crucial decisions. Gathering on the “hottest day of the year” in a “large, drab, bare” jury room is throbbing for most jurors’ present. They have gathered to reach a ‘fair’ verdict and follow the judge’s instruction to “deliberate honestly and thoughtfully” as prejudice and experiences cloud their judgements. Whilst every juror has a different approach to the case, Rose demonstrates that both emotion and reason are used in the process of decision making. Taking decision without the interference of personal life leads one taking a fair judgement.
Analysis Of The Film Twelve Angry Men
981 Words | 4 PagesThe 1957 MGM film entitled Twelve Angry Men provides insight into the personalities, experiences and actions for Juror Nine, Juror Eight, and Juror Three.
The Argument Against The Crowd In The Film 12 Angry Men
961 Words | 4 PagesAn individual can often more than usual doubt their own judgment when they are with a crowd of people. Conforming to what the majority believes because fear of being alone, embarrassed or rejected for how they feel even if their judgment is right. However, there are some people who will stand against the crowd though suffering the consequences or benefits of doing just that and the film 12 Angry Men is one of many examples of that type of incident taking place. First, the plot occurs in the 1950s dealing with twelve jurors who have to decide the fate of a young teenage boy who is accused of killing his own father.
12 Angry Men Moral
1485 Words | 6 PagesIt is everybody's right to have a fair trial. Thirdly, any case has different perspectives, and it is essential to view all the possible perspectives before any final decision is made. Compared to nowadays courtroom drama such as law and order or the good wife, 12 Angry Men appears to give a deeper meaning. While these two series talk about the life of lawyers and how they convey their ideas, deal with complicated cases, and the philosophy of right and wrong, 12 Angry Men presents the case from the jury point of view. It presents how normal people would look at such a case, how would they deal with a complicated murder, and most importantly how would they handle such a
More about Standing Up In 12 Angry Men
Juror 8 In 'Twelve Angry Men' By Reginald Rose
683 Words | 3 PagesThe Leading Role Of The Play In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men
718 Words | 3 PagesTwelve Angry Men By Reginald Rose: Character Analysis
492 Words | 2 PagesCharacter Differences In 12 Angry Men
1133 Words | 5 Pages12 Angry Men Justice Analysis
633 Words | 3 PagesDuty In 12 Angry Men
1052 Words | 5 PagesEthos, Pathos, Pathos And Logos In 12 Angry Men
1964 Words | 8 PagesLoyalty And Jurors In Twelve Angry Men
311 Words | 2 PagesLeadership In 12 Angry Men
630 Words | 3 PagesImportance Of Juror In 12 Angry Men
929 Words | 4 Pages12 Angry Men Analysis
814 Words | 4 PagesDecision Making In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men
911 Words | 4 PagesAnalysis Of The Film Twelve Angry Men
981 Words | 4 PagesThe Argument Against The Crowd In The Film 12 Angry Men
961 Words | 4 Pages12 Angry Men Moral
1485 Words | 6 Pages