I have heard about your recent announcement to take in 5,000 Syrian refugees into our capital city area. As a resident of this area, I believe you are making a mistake. Our community can not support this many more people and still live the comfortable lives we do today. Looking back on the past, places that have accepted refugees have for the most part had negative effects from it. I do not see this situation being too different. I respectfully request that you take a closer look at your decision and re-examine if that is truly the best choice for our community. The capital area should not accept 5,000 refugees because our community is not fit to support them.
Bringing in these migrants would cause some problems. They would need housing, food, and other necessities. This would be the responsibility of our community to provide this because we opened up our arms to them. These costs would be through the roof as providing anything for 5,000 people would be. Our community would become like some countries in Europe who have to set up camps just to hold the refugees. There are only so many places to live in our community, so once that limit is reached, living conditions will suffer. The migrants would cause overcrowding issues and with
…show more content…
The unemployment rate of Maine is 4.7%. If we take in more people, obviously that number will increase. During the United States’ recession in 2009, the unemployment rate peaked at 10%. By increasing our population by 5,000 and Maine’s by 65,000, there will be a scarcity for jobs. This could lead to another economic struggle for our area. For all the unemployed Syrians, they will be carried along by the rest of Maine. More of hard-working Maine taxpayer money will have to go to support the Syrian’s housing and basic needs. The Maine government will also have to pay for the Syrians to take an english course. This will, like the others, comes out of the pockets of our
In her article “Small town welcomes 1,500 refugees a year” (The Guardian, 24 May 2017) Katy Long describes Clarkstown, Georgia. This small, multicultural town is known for their high percentage of refugee inhabitants. However, this article does not mainly showcase how they manage to rehome such a large amount of immigrants, but instead how they integrate them into the town’s identity.
This is only encouraging more immigrants to travel to the U.S. illegally.
Although the U.S. is allowing more Syrian refugees in, it still isn 't much. Having already left Europe
This very situation coincidentally happened with the migrants of the Dust Bowl, “Roosevelt’s Farm Security Administration built 13 camps, each temporarily housing 300 families in tents” (PBS). While the current situation is not being funded by the Syrian or African government, it is still better than sleeping on the streets of a foreign country in Europe. The commonalities between the situations can also give the people a peace of mind by seeing how the United States has rebounded from this disaster. The United States is currently stepping into the situation across seas helping people rebound from the horrific scene. There are people who are overjoyed by the opportunities that the United
Ottawa has approximately 180 Syrian refugees already settled and plan to welcome as many as two thousand more. There are several Mosques so the Syrian family will have plenty of areas to choose from to practice their religion. They will find comfort in being surrounded by the familiarity of other Syrians and Muslims. A Syrian refugee family
America has been the land of immigration since the 1400s. Many people come here for better opportunities, as well as freedom. However, over the years, it has been more difficult for immigrants to come to America due to the government passing laws to tighten the country’s walls and the terrorist attack in Paris last month makes it worst for immigrant to come in. it is very understandable that the government is reluctant to let in some Syrian Refugees into his country. Nevertheless, America should take the refugees into their country because they are in danger, they are in need of a better opportunities, and they need guidance from higher officials.
Immigration has been a controversial issue for many years, both nationally and globally. Since the conception of the country, people have been migrating, crossing both uncharted and charted boundaries for various reasons. Many individuals migrate willingly in search for greater employment opportunity and educational success. There are many others who migrate in order to escape war-torn countries and seek refuge in any country willing to grant them asylum from the continued violence.
Right now, every country has to decide on how many refugees it is willing to accept. Just very recently, Germany agreed to take in 800,000 refugees. In order to cater to the immigrants’ immediate needs, the country needs around $5 billion, and the officials believe that it is manageable. Some countries, like the Kingdom of Denmark, refused to accept any number of
Journalist, Ahmed Agdas, in his article, “Why Taking in Refugees Is Still the Right Thing to Do” argues why we should let the refugees in. The author uses rhetorical strategies to make his argument stronger and to communicate to the readers. Ahmed Agdas is a young politician, journalist, and a student. Agdas’s purpose is to convey the idea that we need to let the refugees in so they don’t die on the border. In today’s society the word refugee has become omnipresent.
Being a peacekeeping country, should allow you to foreshadow on other countries what peacekeeping should guise and how the role of a Western country is significant in a calamity such as the refugee crisis. The issue with that being said is the slight amount of refugees the government has acquired throughout history of refugee crises in third-world countries. The UN Peacekeeping is one of the more major operations of the Security Council, which is the establishment of the peacekeeping missions in the countries who are strictly cladding with conflict such as war, or any form of violence. Peacekeeping missions are set out for those involved in a conflict to settle their differences in non-violent action (NVA) approach, by negotiation rather than resorting to the use of armed conflict. Therefore I believe the government has to resort to their options and how they can help solve the refugee crisis in a peacekeeping or nonviolent action, which can result to helping with humanitarian aid, but more importantly allowing more refugees come into our country at an immediate
To. Mrs. Hopkins, Recently, I have read your controversial and callous article ‘If Britain is prepared to provide an all-inclusive resort service for asylum seekers, the least they can do is wear a bloody wristband.’ From a student with a family member who has experienced being a refugee, I know that the issues regarding asylum seekers and refugees are critical in the modern society. Therefore, I feel that your article, mostly oversimplified and prejudiced, could mislead lots of readers to have undesirable views on those people who are in need.
The United States Government and the welfare of its citizens are chaotic enough, without having to deal with the influx of thousands of new immigrants each year. Along with the myriad immigrants to the U.S., come just as many economic problems. Some of these problems… Show More immigration Essay 601 Words | 3
Though it is true that with the entrance of foreigners there could be a chance at danger to the nation’s security, it is also true that refugees are put through some of the strictest security checks of anyone wanting to enter (Clark).This very action taken by the Governors expresses the same fears of plenty of Americans. The refugees are facing prejudice just as the Joads did. And the prejudice towards them is a harvest of fear. Along with prejudice, the refugees are faced with discrimination. One of this year’s GOP presidential candidates-Ted Cruz- suggested that the US government prioritize the refugees that are Christian (Strickland).
Refugees don’t choose to lead this life but instead are forced to. And as stated above, there is a silver lining to accepting refugees. The least anybody can do is to show them love and kindness and help them build better lives for themselves in contrast to turning a blind eye and pretending that everything will eventually go back to normal. As it appears to be, the situation does not seem likely to decrease in the foreseeable future, and this short-term thinking of various impacts it may have on the country may lead to bigger and longer-term problems for the local economy.
Anthony J. D 'Angelo. One thing is very clear: these few countries doing their best to help refugees can’t manage the refugee issue on their own. We need global cooperation. Therefore, the only solution is moving on to end the bloodbaths and poverty lakes while simultaneously accepting the humanitarian responsibility of taking in the refugees. Migration is a global issue.