Lastly, McEwen had concerns about the Sierra water runoff. He criticized that “ there is no funding for dams or river recirculation technology that would maximize Sierra water runoff and lessen the economic devastation to some San Joaquin Valley farmers”(McEwen). In other words, McEwen wants funding for dams in the Sierra runoff because it would help San Joaquin farmers. His opinion still stands with McClintock in “Bone-dry California dumps water to 'make fish happy '”, an article, quoted by Greg Crorumbos: “We haven’t built a major dam in this state since 1979,” McClintock said. “Meanwhile, the population has nearly doubled.
Farmers use most of our water for growing crops and raising animals. If California doesn’t get enough water food prices are going to rise up. The increasing cost of food decreases the profit of a farmer. “I almost feel like farming will eventually become obsolete here.” ( Herbets 1) . Many people in California are facing horrible problems due to the drought.
Ecology Lab California is currently in a water crisis where we are in a loss of water. Californians need a solution to this water crisis or else the entire state may be stuck without water to supply our water needs. Water is necessary in all of California to maintain a sustainable biodiversity. In order to survive, we need to figure out ways to reduce water use in California, which is famous for its farming and weather. Farmers need to find a new way to reduce water.
But at the same time farmers should have a limit of water they can waste for their needs. There are some farmers that have dams that they own,so pretty much they can open the river when they want and the water will flow in a river for the animals to drink. I think that’s a waste of water because the water flows everyday and it just goes to waste. Some farmers might say that they need the water, that how are they just going to let more than 100 cows die. I think those people just care about the money, because it only helps their needs.
Water is a resource that is necessary for human survival. It is something that all of us come into contact with on a day to day basis and we never really think of where it comes from or its consequences. Many people believe that water should be able to be freely used because of this necessity, however there are those who view water as a vehicle for profit due to its high demand. Pollution, increased population growth, and scarcity have caused the value of water to skyrocket and almost surpass the need and demand for oil. Majority of the freshwater on earth is not accessible by man, causing the small amount that we can access to be fought over by global corporations and local governments.
Article of the Week Response “The Wrong Way to Think about California Water” is an argumentative piece of writing that was written by Michael Hiltzik in the Los Angeles Times. This article stresses mostly about the mere fact of how people waste water; especially in California. The major drought is causing people to use more water than we actually need to use normally. We don’t need to use as much water as we do but we just find useless ways to waste it. Bottling water is one way of wasting it.
It allowed farmers to quickly pump out hundreds of gallons of water underground. This practice quickly progressed into the Great Drought, which then yielded the Central Valley Project. Large corporations, however, took advantage of the CVP illegally because of owning so much land, which allowed them to take more water while small farmers did not own enough land and they only gained a small amount of water. Farmers did everything they can to get water, which progressed, into lobbying and breaking the law. L.A. was also the “one major city” that is “logically tied into the project.” However, L.A. did not even need the water which ties in to Reisner’s statement about transporting water to unneeded places.
It can have a major impact, not only on individuals but a community. In reference to smaller towns on the Navajo Reservation. To some people, they think that only the people of the community can make an end to all of it, but mostly bigger corporations and government can really stop it. But then again, the problem has not been solved yet because apparently the business’ that corrupt water flow have nowhere else to put these waste. Of course, who could
I believe that the large water footprint prevalent in Canadians is because of our government. Firstly, if the government were to enforce a law making water meters mandatory in every household and business, then we would expect to see a huge decrease in the average water consumption. Only 72% of households have water metres, a flat rate per month is not effective because people may be deceived into thinking that they are very conservative with their water usage, however they are using 200+ litres of water than the average Canadian household. Secondly, it should be mandatory that business have a water strategy carefully outlined and disclosed to the government. This helps the government to understand how businesses are making use of their water conservatively.
Most of all though, just think about the how much harm you bottled water drinkers cause to your body and environment. Therefore, tap water is clearly better for everyone. If you were to sit down and think about it, how much do you think you bottled water drinkers are spending? Research shows that on average, Americans spend 2,000 times more than those who drink tap water. To put that in better understanding, 11.8 billion dollars was spent on bottled water in 2012.
Instead of creating a change I also leave point the fault to corporations and I hope for great changes which must be created by organizations or led the responsibility to the government. I considered that we as citizens are not working enough to make our environment better. As how Pollan mentioned, what bother? When miles away from us there is people creating a massive amount of pollution, double that the one that I 'm trying to avoid. But why we should care about them, when if we want to make a huge change we should